President Donald J. Trump's Supreme Court Associate Justice Kavanaugh

[Deranged Rhino]

19 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

He wrote it claiming it was on behalf of the organization...but the organization didn't agree with him and didn't change their rating of BK. 

 

Details don't matter to prog-fascists who are too stupid to realize they're prog-fascists.

Edited October 1, 2018 by Deranged Rhino

[4merper4mer]

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

 

 

I disagree.  All we have is "she said, he said" and it's a matter of who do you believe?  It goes towards that.

Come on dude.  Women of all shapes and sizes have been abused by dudes of all shapes and sizes.  

 

I personally do not believe her story, but could maybe see her confusing it with something else that actually happened to her at someone else's hands.  I despise her commie handlers who have already openly abused her by suggesting unlimited scope, which is a betrayal as simply proving her story would be enough.  The scope demands are for others to make, not lawyers for her.  If they were her lawyers they would be focused on her case, not simply a "get Kavanagh" approach.

 

None of that is a reason for some moron to post her HS picture and call her ugly.  It is similar to a moron Senator asking about farts and other yearbook quotes.  It is 100 per cent irrelevant and goes to the left's divisive assertion that all men are pigs that see women as objects.  There are many unasked questions left for Ford IMO. Asking about her looks is not one of them.

 

The thing I find least credible even after 35 years is that she doesn't remember the parts before the party like who invited her and how she found out about it.  Such a small number of people there...and they were older boys who were evidently popular.  Most teenage girls would remember feeling part of an exclusive club upon the lead up to the party.  It would be another thing altogether if there were 100 people but such a small gathering would be a rare occurrence with people she knew marginally.  I think it's possible.  It could have even been a setup for something like she claimed.....but she would definitely remember the lead up, especially after something significant happened there.

[Tiberius]

16 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/american-bar-association-backs-kavanaugh-despite-previous-letter-to-the-contrary/

 

 

They do not in any way reject what was sent. Just that they kept his previous rating, and I assume that means until there is an investigation. Was this new info received after the new investigation was launched? If it was, the point is...moot 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Tiberius]

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Details don't matter to prog-fascists who are too stupid to realize they're prog-fascists.

You post obviously false and lying links. You are a liar, that's why you are angry. A compulsive liar, actually. Mr. Fake News himself 

[Deranged Rhino]

Prog-fascists who are too stupid to realize they're prog-fascists cannot argue on facts, reason, or rationality. Instead they will slide he conversation to the absurd, and lie to do so, then claim a moral victory. 

 

...Because they're being used by a fascist movement disguised as socialism. 

 

 

[Tiberius]

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Prog-fascists who are too stupid to realize they're prog-fascists cannot argue on facts, reason, or rationality. Instead they will slide he conversation to the absurd, and lie to do so, then claim a moral victory. 

 

...Because they're being used by a fascist movement disguised as socialism. 

 

 

Nunes? 

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Prog-fascists who are too stupid to realize they're prog-fascists cannot argue on facts, reason, or rationality. Instead they will slide the conversation to the absurd, and lie to do so, then claim a moral victory. 

 

...Because they're being used by a fascist movement disguised as socialism. 

 

*Thread from Hatch (who's twitter account has been a great read for the past several weeks). Click for full thread: 

 

*****************************

 

 

[Foxx]

12 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

did Ken Brown totally forget that we are talking about the 80's here?

[Deranged Rhino]

Adding this here to share information for those who are interested in such things. Not an exact science, of course, and the presenter here is a pro but has a bias (so factor that in). 

 

 

*********************************

 

[Tiberius]

The body language experts are here! 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

 

 

Edited October 1, 2018 by Deranged Rhino

[bdutton]

2 hours ago, Joe Miner said:

 

Well you could search for an attractive picture, but we only have a week.

She did a Glamour Shots picture in the late 80's:

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

*****************************************

 

[IDBillzFan]

Where has this guy been?

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

Just now, LABillzFan said:

Where has this guy been?

 

 

 

Controlled. 

 

The puppeteers have been taken out over the past 24 months (for a lot of people, Graham included). It's not an accident his change started almost immediately after no-name left this world. 

[Buffalo_Gal]

42 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

 

And people thought a President Trump was going to be the end of the Republic? The Senate said "hold my beer".

I've found this entire process to be a disgrace to the Senate and the Supreme Court. The lack of dignity, the complete lack of due process ... Devin Nunes may be speaking in hyperbole, but honestly? I do not find what he said wrong.  It is truly a sad time for two of the branches of the government, all because an old woman doesn't want to lose her power, and some soon-to-be-ex Senator doesn't want to lose his chance to be the token-Republican on an MSNBC talk show. 

[3rdnlng]

This memorandum contains Rachel Mitchell’s own independent assessment of Dr. Ford’s allegations, based upon her independent review of the evidence and nearly 25 years of experience as a career prosecutor of sex-related and other crimes in Arizona. She was not pressured in any way to write the memorandum nor any words in it with which she does not fully agree. The words written in this memorandum are Attorney Mitchell’s , and she fully stands by all of them.

“In the legal co...ntext, here is my bottom line: A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.

Here are the nine problems outlined in Mitchell's memo:
1. Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened;
2. Dr. Ford has struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name;
3. When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific;
4. Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in question—details that could help corroborate her account;
5. Dr. Ford’s account of the alleged assault has not been corroborated by anyone she identified as having attended—including her lifelong friend;
6. Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of the alleged assault;
7. Dr. Ford has struggled to recall important recent events relating to her allegations, and her testimony regarding recent events raises further questions about her memory;
8. Dr. Ford’s description of the psychological impact of the event raises questions;
9. The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorneys likely affected Dr. Ford’s account.

See More

 

assets.documentcloud.org

 

assets.documentcloud.org

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[whatdrought]

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Who cares where the FBI are with the process... Are the fake republicans happy? Has this covered their need for attention and to be seen as so sympathetic?