4merper4mer Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 I thought I heard the scope was Ford, then I read today the FBI has been contacting the Yale lady who said she didn't even remember. It's almost as if Katz is running the FBI and Flake is a dupe.
3rdnlng Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 https://www.dangerous.com/49836/records-show-dr-ford-is-not-a-licensed-psychologist-may-have-committed-perjury/ Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a ‘psychologist,’ but records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s faculty page. Just one sentence into her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford may have told a lie. After thanking members of the committee on Thursday, and while under oath, Ford opened her testimony saying, “My name is Christine Blasey Ford, I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.” The issue lies with the word “psychologist,” and Ford potentially misrepresenting herself and her credentials, an infraction that is taken very seriously in the psychology field as well as under California law. Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.
PearlHowardman Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 - Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford couldn't remember if she paid for the July 2018 polygraph or not. - Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford couldn't remember if the July 2018 polygraph was videotaped. - Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford doesn't know what the word "exculpatory" means. - Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford doesn't remember where or when the July 2018 polygraph was administered. - Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford doesn't remember if she shared her therapist notes with the Washington Post or not in her July 2018 interview. - Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford said she doesn't like flying in an airplane but flies a lot in airplanes. - Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford doesn't know who is paying for her lawyers. - Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford claims the alleged 1982 sexual assault by Brett Kavanaugh is "seared into her memory" but constantly had to review notes when testifying to the US Senate. Conclusion: Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford is a complete FRAUD! 1 1
njbuff Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 I would have slapped that lady in the face if I was confronted in a DAMN ELEVATOR like that. But Flake is a flake and he is ok with someone screaming in his face and threatening him.
outsidethebox Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, njbuff said: I would have slapped that lady in the face if I was confronted in a DAMN ELEVATOR like that. But Flake is a flake and he is ok with someone screaming in his face and threatening him. He looked like a giant puss. What a weak man.
PearlHowardman Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/holes-in-christine-blasey-fords-testimony-cast-doubt-that-brett-kavanaugh-was-her-assailant Holes in Christine Blasey Ford's testimony cast doubt that Brett Kavanaugh was her assailant
Nanker Posted September 29, 2018 Author Posted September 29, 2018 33 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: https://www.dangerous.com/49836/records-show-dr-ford-is-not-a-licensed-psychologist-may-have-committed-perjury/ Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a ‘psychologist,’ but records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s faculty page. Just one sentence into her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford may have told a lie. After thanking members of the committee on Thursday, and while under oath, Ford opened her testimony saying, “My name is Christine Blasey Ford, I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.” The issue lies with the word “psychologist,” and Ford potentially misrepresenting herself and her credentials, an infraction that is taken very seriously in the psychology field as well as under California law. Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam. “At this point, what difference does it make?”
3rdnlng Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 3 minutes ago, Nanker said: “At this point, what difference does it make?” It goes to her veracity, Hillary.
Nanker Posted September 29, 2018 Author Posted September 29, 2018 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: who is the blonde behind Flake? Kim Wexler from Hamlin, Hamlin & McGill. Maybe Flake should better Call Saul.
reddogblitz Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 5 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Of course he was there. He had to collect his 37th Purple Heart. Mocking real American Viet Nam war veterans (heroes) is pathetic.
Nanker Posted September 29, 2018 Author Posted September 29, 2018 John Kerry is the furthest thing from an American war hero. He’s a traitor.
3rdnlng Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Mocking real American Viet Nam war veterans (heroes) is pathetic. John Kerry was anything but a hero. Besides he was born to be mocked.
boyst Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 9 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Mocking real American Viet Nam war veterans (heroes) is pathetic. As a Viet Kong vet, I concur. The round eye Kerry is a terrible person, though. Serving in the military gives no one a free pass to be a dickhead or special privilege. 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Magox said: This is freaking unreal. I can't think of many things that I hate more than the media. They are corrupt I haven't been engaged in politics that much over the past year and a half but This Kavanaugh issue has got me fired the !@#$ up. No matter if it turns out that hes guilty or not, the facts that are out there unequivocally shows that he was not involved. I'm sick of it. I have already requested my ballots for my wife and I. I have contacted my brother and parents to get theirs. My parents watched the **** show and were brought to tears by Kavanaugh's testimony. People are pissed. Which is why I believe we need action from the Trump administration against the media. Burn it all to the ground, they are enemies of the people. Edited September 29, 2018 by joesixpack
3rdnlng Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 12 minutes ago, joesixpack said: Which is why I believe we need action from the Trump administration against the media. Burn it all to the ground, they are enemies of the people. We don't need any action by any administration to interfere with the free press. What we need are more citizens handing out Pinnochio Awards. Fake news needs to be criticized and the purveyors of it mocked and ridiculed. 5
3rdnlng Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 I saw this at a social media site and it seemed quite reasonable. I asked myself what advantages do women have over men. I stopped at getting laid whenever they want. Guys ask why women are so pissed off. Even guys with wives and daughters. Jackson Katz, a prominent social researcher, illustrates why. He's done it with hundr...eds of audiences: "I draw a line down the middle of a chalkboard, sketching a male symbol on one side and a female symbol on the other. Then I ask just the men: What steps do you guys take, on a daily basis, to prevent yourselves from being sexually assaulted? At first there is a kind of awkward silence as the men try to figure out if they've been asked a trick question. The silence gives way to a smattering of nervous laughter. Occasionally, a young a guy will raise his hand and say, 'I stay out of prison.' This is typically followed by another moment of laughter, before someone finally raises his hand and soberly states, 'Nothing. I don't think about it.' Then I ask the women the same question. What steps do you take on a daily basis to prevent yourselves from being sexually assaulted? Women throughout the audience immediately start raising their hands. As the men sit in stunned silence, the women recount safety precautions they take as part of their daily routine. Hold my keys as a potential weapon. Look in the back seat of the car before getting in. Carry a cell phone. Don't go jogging at night. Lock all the windows when I sleep, even on hot summer nights. Be careful not to drink too much. Don't put my drink down and come back to it; make sure I see it being poured. Own a big dog. Carry Mace or pepper spray. Have an unlisted phone number. Have a man's voice on my answering machine. Park in well-lit areas. Don't use parking garages. Don't get on elevators with only one man, or with a group of men. Vary my route home from work. Watch what I wear. Don't use highway rest areas. Use a home alarm system. Don't wear headphones when jogging. Avoid forests or wooded areas, even in the daytime. Don't take a first-floor apartment. Go out in groups. Own a firearm. Meet men on first dates in public places. Make sure to have a car or cab fare. Don't make eye contact with men on the street. Make assertive eye contact with men on the street.” ― Jackson Katz, The Macho Paradox: Why Some Men Hurt Women and How All Men Can Help (The first man to minor in women's studies at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, holds a master's degree from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. in cultural studies and education from UCLA.)
whatdrought Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 18 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I saw this at a social media site and it seemed quite reasonable. I asked myself what advantages do women have over men. I stopped at getting laid whenever they want. Guys ask why women are so pissed off. Even guys with wives and daughters. Jackson Katz, a prominent social researcher, illustrates why. He's done it with hundr...eds of audiences: "I draw a line down the middle of a chalkboard, sketching a male symbol on one side and a female symbol on the other. Then I ask just the men: What steps do you guys take, on a daily basis, to prevent yourselves from being sexually assaulted? At first there is a kind of awkward silence as the men try to figure out if they've been asked a trick question. The silence gives way to a smattering of nervous laughter. Occasionally, a young a guy will raise his hand and say, 'I stay out of prison.' This is typically followed by another moment of laughter, before someone finally raises his hand and soberly states, 'Nothing. I don't think about it.' Then I ask the women the same question. What steps do you take on a daily basis to prevent yourselves from being sexually assaulted? Women throughout the audience immediately start raising their hands. As the men sit in stunned silence, the women recount safety precautions they take as part of their daily routine. Hold my keys as a potential weapon. Look in the back seat of the car before getting in. Carry a cell phone. Don't go jogging at night. Lock all the windows when I sleep, even on hot summer nights. Be careful not to drink too much. Don't put my drink down and come back to it; make sure I see it being poured. Own a big dog. Carry Mace or pepper spray. Have an unlisted phone number. Have a man's voice on my answering machine. Park in well-lit areas. Don't use parking garages. Don't get on elevators with only one man, or with a group of men. Vary my route home from work. Watch what I wear. Don't use highway rest areas. Use a home alarm system. Don't wear headphones when jogging. Avoid forests or wooded areas, even in the daytime. Don't take a first-floor apartment. Go out in groups. Own a firearm. Meet men on first dates in public places. Make sure to have a car or cab fare. Don't make eye contact with men on the street. Make assertive eye contact with men on the street.” ― Jackson Katz, The Macho Paradox: Why Some Men Hurt Women and How All Men Can Help (The first man to minor in women's studies at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, holds a master's degree from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. in cultural studies and education from UCLA.) This is really quite good, and inciteful. The problem with this, is that modern feminists and SJW’s use something like this to point to good men who would go out of the way to protect them and accuse them of being the problem. All while demanding meh equality. There is is a fundamental difference between men and women and it isn’t because men are evil and women are not. Pretending difference doesn’t exist only makes identifying issues that much harder. (sorry if off topic)
IDBillzFan Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 This is for those leftists who insist on perpetuating media lies...
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 29, 2018 Posted September 29, 2018 3 minutes ago, whatdrought said: This is really quite good, and inciteful. The problem with this, is that modern feminists and SJW’s use something like this to point to good men who would go out of the way to protect them and accuse them of being the problem. All while demanding meh equality. There is is a fundamental difference between men and women and it isn’t because men are evil and women are not. Pretending difference doesn’t exist only makes identifying issues that much harder. (sorry if off topic) Social Justice Warriors will tell you there are no differences between men and women, while at the same time insisting that there are fundamental differences between men and women. The truth is that men and women are chemically different, and have different pathologies. When it comes to the extremes of those pathologies, things that tend towards deviance and criminality, men at those levels tend towards expressions of violence. Women, having evolved differently, tend towards different types of deviance. The truth is that the overwhelming majority of men are outside the scope of the dangerous parts of their pathology. This is not a problem with men. It's a problem with deviants.
BringBackOrton Posted September 30, 2018 Posted September 30, 2018 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: We don't need any action by any administration to interfere with the free press. What we need are more citizens handing out Pinnochio Awards. Fake news needs to be criticized and the purveyors of it mocked and ridiculed. It is a war we are destined to lose.
Recommended Posts