Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, LSHMEAB said:

I'll grant you that, but he's also got a darkside.

I like his bright side.  The fact that he probably also drowns babies, hangs out with the Clintons, goes to Cosmic Pizza, doesn't rewind the tape before returning it to Blockbuster, .....efff... I just went 6 to midnight..

 

This guy is my wet dream 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Boyst62 said:

I like his bright side.  The fact that he probably also drowns babies, hangs out with the Clintons, goes to Cosmic Pizza, doesn't rewind the tape before returning it to Blockbuster, .....efff... I just went 6 to midnight..

 

This guy is my wet dream 

Ladies and gentlemen.......the base.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, joesixpack said:

I say pull kavanaigh and ramrod Barrett through. !@#$ cooperation. !@#$ bipartisanship. !@#$ procedure and process.

 

Now that I've heard about her I hope O'Kavanaugh doesn't get confirmed.  She might even be more fun to watch.  See the people that need men to stand up eat one of their own.

 

I go by the Molly Ivin's theory.  You pay for all this so you might as well watch it and enjoy it.

Edited by reddogblitz
Posted
Just now, reddogblitz said:

 

Now that I've heard about here I hope O'Kavanaugh doesn't get confirmed.  She might even be more fun to watch.  See the people that need men to stand up eat one of their own.

 

Good luck finding someone to be a rape accuser when the candidate is a woman. 

Posted
56 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

Do you think Katz will tell Ford about these things? I mean, she never told Ford that the committee wanted to come to CA so she didn't have to fly.

 

Who are we to believe Katz is telling Ford anything?

The demand by her attorneys that scope be unlimited is astounding.  Are they representing her or simply using her?  How are they in any position to participate at all except for their reputation of her.  And if they were so confident that her story is true.........

Posted
2 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

Good luck finding someone to be a rape accuser when the candidate is a woman. 

Are you kidding???

 

It won't be mistreatment of men, in her case. It'll be demeaning women and not allowing them to aucceed.  She will be blamed for the glass ceiling, perpetuaating the white cis male.bull ****.

 

 

Keep her for RBG's replacement. Or go get Garland for RBG's rrwplacement

Posted
1 minute ago, Boyst62 said:

Are you kidding???

 

It won't be mistreatment of men, in her case. It'll be demeaning women and not allowing them to aucceed.  She will be blamed for the glass ceiling, perpetuaating the white cis male.bull ****.

 

 

Keep her for RBG's replacement. Or go get Garland for RBG's rrwplacement

 

Garland lol

Posted
1 minute ago, joesixpack said:

 

Garland lol

It's a perfect Trump move.  Troll the !@#$ out of the left, RBG goes to pasture or gets buried in it and then Garland is nominated. How the !@#$ does the Democratic party oppose that?

Posted
17 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

I say pull kavanaigh and ramrod Barrett through. !@#$ cooperation. !@#$ bipartisanship. !@#$ procedure and process.

 

Say B-MAN, you were saying?

 

Trump's best bet is to cut this fool loose.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

It's a perfect Trump move.  Troll the !@#$ out of the left, RBG goes to pasture or gets buried in it and then Garland is nominated. How the !@#$ does the Democratic party oppose that?

At this point the democrats would oppose providing food to starving children in the Central African Republic if Trump was behind it...

Posted
7 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

It's a perfect Trump move.  Troll the !@#$ out of the left, RBG goes to pasture or gets buried in it and then Garland is nominated. How the !@#$ does the Democratic party oppose that?

 

I said that with the Gorsuch nomination: nominate Garland, and let the left tie themselves in knots trying to simultaneously portray Trump as Panzerkampfmaschinegehilfer-Hitler while voting for his nominee.

 

It's the sort of epic troll move that he'd pull off.

2 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

At this point the democrats would oppose providing food to starving children in the Central African Republic if Trump was behind it...

 

They did oppose Bush's anti-HIV/AIDS program in Africa...until 2009, when they praised Obama for it.  :wacko:

Posted
33 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said:

I can't see this FBI investigation lasting more than 1/2 a day.  It could be finished by noon Saturday.  There's only 4 to 5 supposed witnesses to interview.

 

:mellow:

 

It''ll be pursued with the same vigor as was with Hillary.  Oh and don't call it an investigation.  It is the Kavanaugh matter. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

It''ll be pursued with the same vigor as was with Hillary.  Oh and don't call it an investigation.  It is the Kavanaugh matter. 

 

Benghazi involved an international event where Americans were killed.  

 

What we have here is an allegation about an event that may have happened  - 36 years ago - between two teenagers.  Psychologist- Actor Christine Ford gave the name of 4 to 5 witnesses.  It won't take long to interview them at all.  Two of them have already swore under oath that they don't know what Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford is talking about.  Likely they'll affirm what they already stated.  That leaves 2 to 3 other supposed witnesses.  How long can that take?  Not long at all.

Posted
44 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

 

Say B-MAN, you were saying?

 

Trump's best bet is to cut this fool loose.

 

 

So ............since Joe agreed with you ...................I am wrong that Trump will never withdraw  (unless BK asks him)

 

Hahahahahahahahhaha.

 

 

.

Posted
1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

Keep her for RBG's replacement. Or go get Garland for RBG's rrwplacement

 

That's exactly what I'm expecting The Don to do.

 

1 hour ago, PearlHowardman said:

Benghazi involved an international event where Americans were killed.  

 

What we have here is an allegation about an event that may have happened  - 36 years ago - between two teenagers.  Psychologist- Actor Christine Ford gave the name of 4 to 5 witnesses.  It won't take long to interview them at all.  Two of them have already swore under oath that they don't know what Psychologist-Actor Christine Ford is talking about.  Likely they'll affirm what they already stated.  That leaves 2 to 3 other supposed witnesses.  How long can that take?  Not long at all.

 

Throw in Mike Judge, which should add another 30 minutes. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

It's a perfect Trump move.  Troll the !@#$ out of the left, RBG goes to pasture or gets buried in it and then Garland is nominated. How the !@#$ does the Democratic party oppose that?

I agree.  Let's do it.  Schumer already suggested this to Trump btw.

×
×
  • Create New...