RaoulDuke79 Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Doesn't know if she took a polygraph on the day of her grandmother's funeral, or not. Doesn't know if she paid for the polygraph. In the grand scheme of things, these two events are uncommon occurrences for anyone in terms of frequency. One would think that if both happened on the same day it would be rather easy to recollect. Edited September 27, 2018 by RaoulDuke79
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, westside said: Democrats love raping little kids. Is that because they are Democrats, or is it why they become Democrats?
PearlHowardman Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, Magox said: Flake, Murkowski and Collins will very likely not vote for Kavanaugh unless he can put in a stellar performance, in which to be honest with you, I dont think he has it in him like Clarence Thomas. I don't see that at all. Ford provided nothing for any Republican to vote against Kavanaugh. When Ford has "quite a few inconsistencies and very little if any corroborating evidence to support her case" Kavanaugh should easily be confirmed.
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Rob's House said: I do. I want to know who does your yard. Mine keeps getting overrun with weeds. Try cutting it once and awhile
Figster Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Magox said: Ford came off as credible even though there were quite a few inconsistencies and very little if any corroborating evidence to support her case. But that most likely wont matter. Flake, Murkowski and Collins will very likely not vote for Kavanaugh unless he can put in a stellar performance, in which to be honest with you, I dont think he has it in him like Clarence Thomas. That's unfortunate, because it appears performances are more important than actual evidence. Not knowing who drove her home among other things like where or when begs to ask how intoxicated Mrs Ford was at the time of the alleged sexual misconduct IMO.
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 "The laughter of the two as they attacked her" Total frat boy scum bags
Foxx Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: Agreed. She raised enough doubt for any Republican to vote against Kavanaugh. And that's what/all that matters. 1 minute ago, PearlHowardman said: I don't see that at all. Ford provided nothing for any Republican to vote against Kavanaugh. When Ford has "quite a few inconsistencies and very little if any corroborating evidence to support her case" Kavanaugh should easily be confirmed. are these two post are direct odds with one another? 1
Figster Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, Foxx said: are these two post are direct odds with one another? yup
Magox Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, PearlHowardman said: I don't see that at all. Ford provided nothing for any Republican to vote against Kavanaugh. When Ford has "quite a few inconsistencies and very little if any corroborating evidence to support her case" Kavanaugh should easily be confirmed. I'm not arguing the merits rather how I believe they'll vote. I think they will tell McConnell that they just can't vote for him at this time. And he will have to shelve the vote in which Trump will pull the nomination. Unless Kavanaugh can put in the performance of his life.
RaoulDuke79 Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) 23 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: What a clueless !@#$......nonsense like this only helps the right. Edited September 27, 2018 by RaoulDuke79
PearlHowardman Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, Foxx said: are these two post are direct odds with one another? Mitchell raised enough doubt about Ford's claim that it would make it impossible for any Republican to vote against Kavanaugh.
Rob's House Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Try cutting it once and awhile That sounds like a lot of work. 1
BeginnersMind Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) Are the Dems going to outsource their questioning or will they own it? And will the Rs question Kavanaugh or let Mitchell do it? (I keep asking this: I honestly don't know but it will look bad if they wouldn't talk to Ford but will talk to Kavanaugh.) 8 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: Mitchell raised enough doubt about Ford's claim that it would make it impossible for any Republican to vote against Kavanaugh. Unless they want more information. Edited September 27, 2018 by BeginnersMind
Foxx Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 7 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: Mitchell raised enough doubt about Ford's claim that it would make it impossible for any Republican to vote against Kavanaugh. you might want to edit your post then.
IDBillzFan Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 8 minutes ago, Magox said: I'm not arguing the merits rather how I believe they'll vote. I think they will tell McConnell that they just can't vote for him at this time. And he will have to shelve the vote in which Trump will pull the nomination. Unless Kavanaugh can put in the performance of his life. I fear this is accurate. It's pretty clear that there is literally NO corroboration. All her details are questionable. The Dems used her like a pawn. They got the show they wanted, because all Ford had to do was sound like someone you would sympathize with...and she apparently did that. The facts won't matter here. The perception will.
PearlHowardman Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, Magox said: I think they will tell McConnell that they just can't vote for him at this time. And he will have to shelve the vote in which Trump will pull the nomination. Mitch McConnell is shrewd. He'll just tell Flake, Murkowski, and Collins that they'll have to publicly state why they oppose Kavanaugh. And it won't go over with the voting public. Your words: "...quite a few inconsistencies and very little if any corroborating evidence to support her case..." You are 100% correct. No way any Republican can vote against Kavanaugh. Not after today. The upcoming testimony of Kavanaugh is irrelevant.
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 29 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Sorry, she's not a rape victim or anything close even if as she described the incident as true.
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 11 minutes ago, Magox said: Unless Kavanaugh can put in the performance of his life. Maybe he will just start telling funny jokes to win people over...
LSHMEAB Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You should try renting your insecurity before owning your bias. It has nothing to do with insecurity. I'm very comfortable with my own abilities and limitations. I personally admire and respect those who overcome adversity and bust their a*s to achieve greatness. I'm not a fan of those born on third base who score on a passed ball and act like they hit a home run. Not quite sure why that's controversial or noteworthy.
IDBillzFan Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 12 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said: What a clueless !@#$......nonsense like this only helps the right. But that's the position of the left in America. They have no need or respect for the military in any capacity. It's how they're able to so easily lie about what caused the deaths in Benghazi just as they are happy to say Peter Strzok should get a purple heart.
Recommended Posts