Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said:

 

How can you not know whether (weather) you did or did not pay for a polygraph test?

 

Your lawyers paid for it, and you didn't check the itemized bill.  

 

All of this is such ambiguous bull **** that I can objectively justify just about any statement made.  There's no resolution to be found here.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

For a well educated "hero" professor from Stanford, she sure doesn't understand a lot of really simple, basic questions. 

I LOLed at the dichotomy:

 

"Yes, I released norepinephrine, epinephrine and cortisol and managed to escape"

 

"What does exculpatory mean?"

 

Just trying to click down that clock.  Dems are hoping they can drag this out another day, then accuse the right of exposing her to this hostile environment for too long.

Posted
1 minute ago, BringBackOrton said:

I LOLed at the dichotomy:

 

"Yes, I released norepinephrine, epinephrine and cortisol and managed to escape"

 

"What does exculpatory mean?"

 

Just trying to click down that clock.  Dems are hoping they can drag this out another day, then accuse the right of exposing her to this hostile environment for too long.

 

Apparently, the smarter the testifier, the more spotty the vocabulary.  Bill Clinton's well-known as a genius, and wasn't clear on the definition of "is."

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

The good thing about this line of questioning is that it's making her flustered. You can tell how coached she is when she turns to the lawyers for guidance.

 

But Mitchell can't make any headway--she makes a little progress seemingly and then STOP. How the letter got leaked is probably a dead end but Mitchell has to root around in there.

 

The format is a disaster for the Rs. 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...