Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 For the dumbass above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Great personal risk. National Television. Book deal likely forthcoming. Movie rights in 20 years. I can't say 100% that she's a fraud, but the idea that there's nothing here to be gained is just bull ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 She's talking about treating people with respect - this the same woman who told ALL men to just "shut up" not more than a week ago. What a two face asshat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 She's talking about Trump.... What a mockery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 No questions asked (but for rhetorical ones) - just grandstanding. Booker and Harris will be worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 13 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said: And like Klansmen, I'm willing to own my bias. I don't like prep school punks born with a silver spoon in their mouth, especially when they espouse holier than thou judicial policies. I feel like society would have more productive conversations if people would just drop the guise of impartiality. Nobody is 100% impartial. It's impossible. You should try renting your insecurity before owning your bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 2 hours ago, LSHMEAB said: If Brett Kavanaugh weren't such an entitled prick, I'd feel sorry him. Trump was correct about one thing in that truly bizarre rant yesterday; guilty until proven innocent is a dangerous precedent. The left believes this when it comes to privileged men and the right believes this when it comes to minorities. So much hypocrisy on both sides. What the !@#$ is this idiocy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Pre-Judging the outcome of the hearing... It was a dem who started his questioning with "I believe you 100%." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: What sinking ship? What specifically did you hear this morning that buttresses (proves) Dr. Ford's accusation that she was sexually assaulted by Judge Brett Kavanaugh? It is not me. I heard nothing. But the Republicans have to buttress (ha) themselves from the media spin zone they are about to enter if all they do is cross-examine her story and her credibility as an accuser. If they do not clearly and consistently examine and re-examine the facts and evidence of her case, and make her state she has no evidence, they will cost themselves voters. 2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: When it's just he said, she said, I agree. But there is some minimal credibility here...and...wait for it...there was someone else, an eye-friggin-witness in the room! How are we not hearing from him? It's not that hard to subpoena him. I don't care. Her credibility as an accuser got her to this stage and that's as far as it matters. We have heard from Mike Judge. He denied knowledge of the incident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) Quote My brother went to a school just like Georgetown Prep and then to Yale because he worked his a*s off. I personally encountered enough Brett Kavanaugh's to form an opinion of this particular Brett Kavanaugh. Get drunk. Do awful sh*t. And then get away with it because Daddy has an unlimited checkbook. We're all shaped by experience. My kids go/went to a school just like Georgetown Prep..as a matter of fact we play them in Lacrosse and other sports all the time. You saying my kids do awful stuff and lie about it? What an assinine statement. Just as assinine as 1500 girls saying they believed her just cause they all graduated from Holton Arms..that is equally as asinine. Judge people on merits, not on social class, race, religion etc. I agree with TITT( which is appalling to me LOL) ...it is just a biased statement that holds no truth Edited September 27, 2018 by plenzmd1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: How can you not know whether (weather) you did or did not pay for a polygraph test? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Both her lawyers are like a vaudeville team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Someone needs to tell those worthless lawyers that they don't have microphones for a reason. Also, why questioning the polygraph so strongly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 GoFundMe/MoneyLaundering strikes again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The good senator from Hawaii, who has proven that she doesn't understand the law or the constitution with her questioning of ICE officials, is now telling Mitchell - a professional - how to do her job. What a !@#$. She's an idiot BUT a bunch of people here were just saying they want Mitchell to ask about the actual event too. I don't think she's going to do it. I thought she said during her first 5 minutes that she would not be returning to it. My guess is that Michell has been told not to because she will just get a broken down crying witness that will elicit sympathy. 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: For the dumbass above. Mark Judge was in the room, according to her. Might be a good witness to hear from, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, whatdrought said: Someone needs to tell those worthless lawyers that they don't have microphones for a reason. Also, why questioning the polygraph so strongly? They're trying to show that she's being funded by political operatives. Which she is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 She's a blithering idiot or an oscar caliber actress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 For a well educated "hero" professor from Stanford, she sure doesn't understand a lot of really simple, basic questions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Mitchell is losing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, whatdrought said: Mitchell is losing it. She just got her on the letter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts