plenzmd1 Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, LeviF91 said: You didn't ask what it had to do with the hearing, you asked who cares. Clean out your front hole, lenz. I guess in a thread all about the nominee and this hearing...it would be a leap to assume the correlation.....for dolts
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: jesus..really? you dont think that is pressure relief ??? Probably not. You don't generally recover that quickly from reliving that trauma, either. But it is ALWAYS difficult to accurately judge a rape victim's behavior. It's highly individualized. As I once told someone "You're not screwed up, you're normal. You were assaulted; If you weren't impacted by it, THAT would be screwed up."
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, whatdrought said: Why didn't the dems subpoena Judge? They are in the minority
PearlHowardman Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Jesus, @DC Tomhelp me here...can i use your trademark? WTH does it have to do with THIS hearing! And whether you have $500, or $ 501, does it really matter? My hunch is that Wall Street might be paying attention to this because Wall Street pays attention to and overreacts to everything. And if Wall Street sensed that there's a problem for Kavanaugh from Ford's testimony then Wall Street numbers would be down.
Foxx Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Jesus, @DC Tomhelp me here...can i use your trademark? WTH does it have to do with THIS hearing! And whether you have $500, or $ 501, does it really matter? not to get too far off the topic at hand but.... i would venture an argument that yes, it matters very much whether or not i have $500 or $501.
LeviF Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, plenzmd1 said: I guess in a thread all about the nominee and this hearing...it would be a leap to assume the correlation.....for dolts You sure seem upset by all this. Did someone drop $50k in your lap to accuse a certain judge of something tonight?
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said: have you ever testified before Congress with the whole stinking country watching you? Dang, I know I get that pressure relief after a big presentation in front of prospects executives....when yall take it to that level you are doing exactly what you say you hate...making up your mind before hearing and watching and forming your opinion before assigning guilt or innocence. Fine. She's changed her story so many times it has taken an unbelievable story, and made it even less believable. She sounds like a 50year old valley girl on helium, with an over active imagination. Her attorneys have done an excellent job giving her a script to fill in the holes and fleshed out her tall tale - the fourth revision. **** like this makes it more difficult for real victims of rape to come forward. This, to me, makes a mockery of real survivors of sexual assault. 2 2
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Probably not. You don't generally recover that quickly from reliving that trauma, either. But it is ALWAYS difficult to accurately judge a rape victim's behavior. It's highly individualized. As I once told someone "You're not screwed up, you're normal. You were assaulted; If you weren't impacted by it, THAT would be screwed up." Add to that the setting - which is unusual and highly stressful for people not dealing with Trauma. That's why I'm trying hard to keep an open mind. But again, nothing of her story has been corroborated by anyone, even the people she named in her letter.
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: They are in the minority Okay- So that means they cannot? Honestly wondering, as I don't know the procedure of this.
Nanker Posted September 27, 2018 Author Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Probably not. You don't generally recover that quickly from reliving that trauma, either. But it is ALWAYS difficult to accurately judge a rape victim's behavior. It's highly individualized. As I once told someone "You're not screwed up, you're normal. You were assaulted; If you weren't impacted by it, THAT would be screwed up." Tom, she has not accused him of RAPE. 2
plenzmd1 Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Probably not. You don't generally recover that quickly from reliving that trauma, either. But it is ALWAYS difficult to accurately judge a rape victim's behavior. It's highly individualized. As I once told someone "You're not screwed up, you're normal. You were assaulted; If you weren't impacted by it, THAT would be screwed up." Tom, i am saying the immediate relief the break provided showed in her body language, She got through the first section, and i think that relief showed..
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 And I can't stress how bad the optics are for her sitting next to McCabe's attorney. She should have stuck with just Katz - who has her own issues with optics. But having both of them just makes her look like a professional operative rather than a victim (to people who know who the attorneys are of course)
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Probably not. You don't generally recover that quickly from reliving that trauma, either. But it is ALWAYS difficult to accurately judge a rape victim's behavior. It's highly individualized. As I once told someone "You're not screwed up, you're normal. You were assaulted; If you weren't impacted by it, THAT would be screwed up." She was not raped. 1
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, PearlHowardman said: My hunch is that Wall Street might be paying attention to this because Wall Street pays attention to and overreacts to everything. And if Wall Street sensed that there's a problem for Kavanaugh from Ford's testimony then Wall Street numbers would be down. Is there an issue before the court that directly affects the market? Just now, whatdrought said: Okay- So that means they cannot? Honestly wondering, as I don't know the procedure of this. They can't, that's it. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 Ford's hired security REALLY doesn't hide in the crowd
Big Gun Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Add to that the setting - which is unusual and highly stressful for people not dealing with Trauma. That's why I'm trying hard to keep an open mind. But again, nothing of her story has been corroborated by anyone, even the people she named in her letter. She a liar.
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 So just to check- The dems have the right to ask questions and the republicans do as well. The republicans are choosing to do so through Mrs. Mitchell, and the dems are taking turns? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Posted September 27, 2018 The camera showed Kennedy's computer screen as Mitchell began... 1
Nanker Posted September 27, 2018 Author Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Fine. She's changed her story so many times it has taken an unbelievable story, and made it even less believable. She sounds like a 50year old valley girl on helium, with an over active imagination. Her attorneys have done an excellent job giving her a script to fill in the holes and fleshed out her tall tale - the fourth revision. **** like this makes it more difficult for real victims of rape to come forward. This, to me, makes a mockery of real survivors of sexual assault. Perfect!
Recommended Posts