Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

Trying to explain that's what the Dems main goal is here.  To get Trump to tweet or say something really stupid.

 

That doesn't appear to be a real chore so far....

Posted
1 minute ago, Albwan said:

Tucker Carlson crushed that guy a few weeks back. At the end of the interview he

basically called him a pimp. Stormy has to strip while you get to run for president?

Guy is a loser. Another one like Nancy, Maxine, and Booker ...Just hope they

keep attacking, they are fools.

Hey! An admitted Tucker Carlson fan! 

Posted
41 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

Women are more likely to let the attack go unpunished than to report it after 36 years. Of that, there is no doubt. 

 

But for Trump to attack her credibility because she didn’t report it 36 years ago is abhorrent. 

 

Apple News is an echo chamber. I’d get out of it. 

 

The story is a top one at the WSJ and most outlets. 

 

I know what Apple news is, thanks.

And I have WSJ send me breaking stories -- they never sent me anything today on this story.

Thinking that maybe I'm mistaken, I just went to the WSJ site.  You're wrong.  The only mention of the Avenatti story is this op ed piece:  https://www.wsj.com/articles/has-michael-avenatti-become-an-embarrassment-to-stormy-daniels-1537993145?mod=hp_opin_pos1

 

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Which would still be better than having to walk around all day as a living advertisement for abstinence ;)

Hey, I have him as a perfect example for the argument for retroactive abortion.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Quote

Meanwhile, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), tweeted that 20 investigators are at work, “tracking down all allegations/leads & talking to all witnesses & gathering all evidence.” He said “seasoned congressional investigators, temporary staff brought on for the nomination as well as “experienced fed agents” on loan from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement are on the case.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/kavanaugh-nomination-trump-calls-nominee-an-absolute-gem-as-tensions-swirl-over-planned-hearing/2018/09/26/df224aea-c190-11e8-97a5-ab1e46bb3bc7_story.html?utm_term=.fa57c4be8e3f

 

makes sense. I would think it would be easier to find out it was impossible for these things to have happened--like they were out of town, or there were no parties, or something else exculpatory--than to prove they did happen. 

Posted

 

 

Judge will have to testify eventually. His girlfriend is, why shouldn't he. 

 

“Ms. Rasor’s statement that Mark Judge told her about his participation in a gang rape when he was in high school is powerful corroborating evidence,” the senior Democratic aide to the Judiciary Committee told me. “She is willing to cooperate with the Judiciary Committee and the FBI.” The aide added that this raises further question sabout why “Mark Judge is hiding out in Bethany Beach and Republicans refuse to call him as a witness.”

Posted
1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

Trying to explain that's what the Dems main goal is here.  To get Trump to tweet or say something really stupid.

 

Step 1: "Wait..."

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

Judge will have to testify eventually. His girlfriend is, why shouldn't he. 

 

“Ms. Rasor’s statement that Mark Judge told her about his participation in a gang rape when he was in high school is powerful corroborating evidence,” the senior Democratic aide to the Judiciary Committee told me. “She is willing to cooperate with the Judiciary Committee and the FBI.” The aide added that this raises further question sabout why “Mark Judge is hiding out in Bethany Beach and Republicans refuse to call him as a witness.”

 

Really?  Men talking about sexual conquests is like fishermen talking about fish they caught.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, reddogblitz said:

 

Really?  Men talking about sexual conquests is like fishermen talking about fish they caught.

Gang rape?? You know guys that talk about that?? 

Posted
53 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

Women are more likely to let the attack go unpunished than to report it after 36 years. Of that, there is no doubt. 

 

 

Tell that to Bill Cosby.

 

Really...victims of sexual assault aren't all that easily predictable in behavior.  That sort of trauma can do unpredictable things to a psychology.  About the only generalization you can reliably make is that victims who don't exhibit agency early on won't in later years...and those who do usually handle the trauma much better.

 

Which is why it's better to encourage and support assault victims to report at the time of the assault, instead of grossly abusing Title IX or pulling this "political hack job 36 years later" bull ****.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...