President Donald J. Trump's Supreme Court Associate Justice Kavanaugh

[bbb]

I was just reading an article on Rolling Stone, not about this but about the #metoo movement and found this line unbelievable:

 

Quote

As contrarian trolls on the Internet will jump at any opportunity to point out, not all men are sexual predators

 

Contrarian trolls?!?

[DC Tom]

1 minute ago, bbb said:

I was just reading an article on Rolling Stone, not about this but about the #metoo movement and found this line unbelievable:

 

 

Contrarian trolls?!?

 

I saw an article yesterday about how #metoo has to start addressing the "grey area" of sexual assault.  In which they quoted as an example of sexual assault an anecdote of "My boyfriend sexually assaulted me when he would only have sex with me if I wore the eye shadow he liked."

 

...wait...!@#$ing what???? 

[Tiberius]

I saw the President say that since a women was drunk then she can't really report being sexually assaulted. 

 

Ya ya, prog-nazi blah blah 

[LSHMEAB]

13 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

I believe he wanted the specifics on what was "there".... Specifically, evidence. 

 

Abstinence is literally just the act of abstaining.... Some abstain from thought (we have plenty of that present), some abstain from politics (sadly not the case here), and some abstain from sex (plenty of that here I am sure, but I doubt it's intentional.) 

If the teaching of it is mishandled is another topic- the actual philosophy behind it being the only true birth control/std control is actually spot on. 

Arguing the specifics of these allegations is a rabbit hole I'd prefer not go down.

 

15 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Do you have a link for this?  I'd love to see it. George was the best.  "In baseball, you just want to go home."

Couldn't find the specific bit about abstinence only sex ed creating repression, but I found this gem. 

 

16 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Weird?

 

Everything I've heard so far is downright normal college and HS behavior at the time.  Not even excessive.

 

Source: I was alive back then.

 

"Double dumbass pork chop on you!"

As I said; it's the hypocrisy, not the behavior. I should add the caveat that I have a deep distrust for anyone claiming to be holier than thou.

Edited September 26, 2018 by LSHMEAB

[reddogblitz]

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

I saw an article yesterday about how #metoo has to start addressing the "grey area" of sexual assault.  In which they quoted as an example of sexual assault an anecdote of "My boyfriend sexually assaulted me when he would only have sex with me if I wore the eye shadow he liked."

 

...wait...!@#$ing what???? 

 

Good thing for Jimmy Stewart these weren't the rules when he made Vertigo.

3 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

 

 

 

yeah I've seen this one.  the one you mentioned sounds better.  Let me know if you find it.

[whatdrought]

8 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Arguing the specifics of these allegations is a rabbit hole I'd prefer not go down.

 

Nice dodge. 

[DC Tom]

10 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

Nice dodge. 

 

I think it's a fair dodge.  People keep wanting to argue the truth of the allegations, when that's ultimately irrelevant to the abuse by the Democrats of Senate procedure and rape victims.

 

In fact, the only assault we have any evidence of is the brutal ass-raping of parliamentary procedure by the Democrats.

[whatdrought]

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I think it's a fair dodge.  People keep wanting to argue the truth of the allegations, when that's ultimately irrelevant to the abuse by the Democrats of Senate procedure and rape victims.

 

In fact, the only assault we have any evidence of is the brutal ass-raping of parliamentary procedure by the Democrats.

 

Except that the issue that he dodged was his statement of Kavanaughs "sexual deviancy" which is 100% unproved. When asked for evidence, he dodged. 

[Doc Brown]

3 hours ago, westside said:

Is that what your focusing on? What Trump tweeted? Not the fact that somd lieing leftwing bimbo is trying to disrupt the appointing a very accomplished and worthy Supreme court Judge?

Glad to see you have your priorities in order.

Trying to explain that's what the Dems main goal is here.  To get Trump to tweet or say something really stupid.

[snafu]

1 hour ago, LSHMEAB said:

 

Funny that so many dismiss Avenatti as the "worst thing for the Democrats." 

 

I remember when Trump was the "worst thing for the Republicans."

 

Granted he's a terrible president, but the guy won.

 

Funny how I noticed that Avenatti is not in my iPhone news feed. Usually, when the MSM thinks the story hurts the administration or is slanted toward Democrats a story like that is splashed everywhere. This one has crickets. The Dems have no use for Avenatti. 

[Nanker]

As do most right thinking Americans. 

[boyst]

Democrats may not have use for Avenatti but the retards on the short bus do.   From LHSBEAMS and the new slow-mo students all the way to the leaders of the pack like Baskin and Gator - the next month is gonna be a hoot.

 

Buckle up the short bus, make them wear their helmet and for the Holy sky fairy's sake: do not give them anything but safety siccors. They may hurt someone.

[LSHMEAB]

7 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Democrats may not have use for Avenatti but the retards on the short bus do.   From LHSBEAMS and the new slow-mo students all the way to the leaders of the pack like Baskin and Gator - the next month is gonna be a hoot.

 

Buckle up the short bus, make them wear their helmet and for the Holy sky fairy's sake: do not give them anything but safety siccors. They may hurt someone.

I'm convinced "siccors" was not a typo. 

[TakeYouToTasker]

1 hour ago, LSHMEAB said:

Arguing the specifics of these allegations is a rabbit hole I'd prefer not go down.

 

This is untrue, given your referencing of "Brett Kavanaugh's creepy sexual deviancy."

 

You have attempted to legitimize it, conferring truth on the allegations.

 

Speak to it.

[BeginnersMind]

3 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

Women often don't wait 36 years until a politically convenient time arises to drop intentionally vague allegations designed to not give the accused any opportunity to investigate and refute.

 

Women are more likely to let the attack go unpunished than to report it after 36 years. Of that, there is no doubt. 

 

But for Trump to attack her credibility because she didn’t report it 36 years ago is abhorrent. 

29 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

Funny how I noticed that Avenatti is not in my iPhone news feed. Usually, when the MSM thinks the story hurts the administration or is slanted toward Democrats a story like that is splashed everywhere. This one has crickets. The Dems have no use for Avenatti. 

 

Apple News is an echo chamber. I’d get out of it. 

 

The story is a top one at the WSJ and most outlets. 

[boyst]

8 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

I'm convinced "siccors" was not a typo. 

Scissors. Odd it didn't autocorrect. Don't care if it didn't.

 

Clearly you've never seen my working before Google's ipgrade with the autocorrect.  Likely, I just don't care.   You bring the board down and are a drain on the intelligence of mankind. 

 

Try harder.  Or shut up.  Or do neither and continue to be the laughing stock you are.

[BringBackOrton]

1 hour ago, LSHMEAB said:

 

I don't believe every accuser. I do believe this guy was involved in some weird things as a teenager and college student. There's too much there. When your public persona is that of a sanctimonious windbag, it's only fitting that hypocrisy comes back to bite you. 

 

For me, it's not the allegations that I find troubling. It's knowing how he'd treat these allegations if they were made against someone who didn't have the public facade of a choir boy.

 

Abstinence training is flawed because you're teaching children that their most innate desires are inherently wrong. It leads to confusion, shame, and deviancy. George Carlin explained this better than I could ever dare dream. 

 

Oh come on!

[Deranged Rhino]

People still shocked that Trump is not a politician, should REALLY take a step back and re-examine the past two years with fresh eyes. Trump's a counter puncher. That's who he is, that's why he was tapped for this job at this time by the voters (and others). He's not going to play by the traditional decorum rules because he's not that guy. 

 

He's exactly who people thought he was when he was elected. As Michael Moore said in his October 2016 ad: he's a moltov cocktail thrown into the establishment as a giant !@#$ you from the people. 

[boyst]

2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

Women are more likely to let the attack go unpunished than to report it after 36 years. Of that, there is no doubt. 

 

But for Trump to attack her credibility because she didn’t report it 36 years ago is abhorrent. 

 

Apple News is an echo chamber. I’d get out of it. 

 

The story is a top one at the WSJ and most outlets. 

She deserves attacking.  She's a vile witch who should be thrown to sea.

[Nanker]

No, Closed Mind. It’s no less abhorrent than the unwarranted sleaze attack of character assassination that the Left is doing to the Judge. Fight fire with fire. The Dems have done this kind of unbridled attacking for decades and have gotten away with it. Trump isn’t afraid to roll around in the gutter with the likes of Schumer, Feinstein, and Pelosi. Quite shocking isn’t it? There’s a “Republican” who knows how to fight back at a street fighting gang of hoodlums.