Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, ALF said:

James Comey urges voters to choose Democrats, warns that 'history has its eyes on us'

 

Former FBI Director James Comey on Tuesday said “history has its eyes on us” and encouraged Americans to vote for Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections.

 

Comey, who was fired by President Donald Trump in May 2017, issued a tweet urging Americans to snub Republicans this November.

 

“This Republican Congress has proven incapable of fulfilling the Founders’ design that ‘Ambition must … counteract ambition,’” tweeted the former FBI director, a longtime supporter of Republicans. “All who believe in this country’s values must vote for Democrats this fall. History has its eyes on us.”

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/18/james-comey-urges-voters-to-choose-democrats-warns-that-history-has-its-eyes-on-us.html

 

Lordy, Lordy ,  another walks away

 

He quotes Hamilton (the play, not the man because Comey is that guy), but completely fumbles the meaning of Federalist Paper 51. :lol: 

 

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=10&page=transcript

Posted
6 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Well, this is interesting...

 

Republican National Committee fundraising is fiery hot: the RNC has now raised $213 million for the 2017-2018 election cycle, at least $100 million more than the Democratic National Committee raised during the same time period.
 

The RNC raised $13.9 million in June, a record for June in a non-presidential year, as The Washington Free Beacon reports. In addition, the RNC has no debt and $50.7 million cash on hand, quintupling the cash on hand held by the DNC.

 

The DNC didn't do as well apparently. Now, that does not mean individuals in specific races are not doing well with fundraising And of course, it could also mean that the D money is being very targeted. Still, it does not look like people are eager to simply generically support the DNC socialist platform.

 

 

#BLUEWAVE

Posted
45 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

It's always money vs. the People

Though even with twice the money, your honey couldn't beat all those deplorables that supported Trump.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
7 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Well, this is interesting...

 

Republican National Committee fundraising is fiery hot: the RNC has now raised $213 million for the 2017-2018 election cycle, at least $100 million more than the Democratic National Committee raised during the same time period.
 

The RNC raised $13.9 million in June, a record for June in a non-presidential year, as The Washington Free Beacon reports. In addition, the RNC has no debt and $50.7 million cash on hand, quintupling the cash on hand held by the DNC.

 

The DNC didn't do as well apparently. Now, that does not mean individuals in specific races are not doing well with fundraising And of course, it could also mean that the D money is being very targeted. Still, it does not look like people are eager to simply generically support the DNC socialist platform.

 

 

Fundraising is not an indicator of success.  How much did the DNC out raise the RNC in 2016?

 

24 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Mrs. Clinton's total expenses were $565 million,  Mr. Trump spent $322 million

 

 

 

 

Which re-enforces my point above

 

On a somewhat related note, I recall both major Presidential candidates loaned their campaigns personal funds

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18764750

https://www.npr.org/2016/05/04/476783557/donald-trump-shifts-to-fundraising-after-loaning-his-campaign-38-million

 

How is that even legal?  A loan generates interest which means a campaign "loan" can be used as a private revenue stream

Posted
28 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

Jeez, I take two days off and , the libs are are panicking and lying more than ever.....:lol:

.

Come clean, B-man, did you tell 26CopyPaste that you were going to be gone for a couple days and he should fill in for you? We like you. You're a member of this conservative circle jerk, baby killing and grandma extermination group and although you copy and paste a lot we know you can state a case in your own words. 26CopyPaste on the other hand has never used the keyboard but is proficient with his mouse, so you can imagine the difficulty he had in carrying on a conversation here. I told him he was wrong about tariffs and he sent me back a recipe for meatless lasagna in response. Please don't ever let him know when you're going to step out of the circle jerk again.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

Fundraising is not an indicator of success.  How much did the DNC out raise the RNC in 2016?

It is historically especially in the House and Senate in the midterms.  94% of the House races and 82% of the Senate races were won by the candidate that spent the most money in the last midterms.

 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/money-pretty-good-predictor-will-win-elections

 

As for the last presidential election, the idiots on the cable news channels gave Trump an estimated 5 billion dollars worth of free air time.  I find it hilarious that CNN and MSNBC don't hold his rallies live anymore.  They gave Hillary around 3.2 billion in free air time.

Posted

Those big tax cuts for business and the rich will well finance the mid terms for republicans I would bet.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Though even with twice the money, your honey couldn't beat all those deplorables that supported Trump.

This a complete farce. All the dark money, outside interest groups, big money donors are not counted in the campaigns.

Posted
11 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Well, this is interesting...

.

 

The DNC didn't do as well apparently. Now, that does not mean individuals in specific races are not doing well with fundraising And of course, it could also mean that the D money is being very targeted. Still, it does not look like people are eager to simply generically support the DNC socialist platform.

 

But a relatively small number of wealthy donors are willing to simply generically support the Republican nonsense platform...don't leave that out.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
On 7/18/2018 at 12:47 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They're back to blaming it all on bots... delusion of this magnitude is dangerous. 

 

 

 

1

 

It's a grass roots movement, and one I applaud till my hands bleed.

 

But there's no doubt the bots are amplifying the message: The Russian goal is to seed discord. Hamilton 68 has #walkaway as the bots' second most used tag this week. 

Edited by BeginnersMind
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

This dude needs to walk away 

 

8. HANDS-ON

3 hours ago

Macron Adviser ‘Put On Riot Gear and Attacked Anti-Government Protesters’

 
 
 
 
 

One of French President Emmanuel Macron’s senior aides is at the center of a bizarre scandal in Paris, where he’s accused of donning police riot gear and personally attacking anti-government protesters. Alexandre Benalla, an assistant to Macron’s chief of staff, was filmed targeting a woman and a man during May Day protests against Macron’s employment reforms—he was identified by leading French newspaper Le Monde. In the video, Benalla is seen grabbing a woman by the neck and charging her down the street, then hitting a young male protester in the head and apparently stamping on his stomach. It is not clear if Benalla was attending the protests in any kind of official capacity—he was filmed wearing an official police visor but he was not in uniform. Benalla has been suspended for two weeks without pay and has been moved out of his role of organizing security for the president’s visits. The Paris prosecutor’s office announced Thursday it was opening preliminary investigation into the allegations.

???? ALERTA VIOLENCES POLICIÈRES 

DES POLICIERS TABASSENT ET GAZENT TOUT LE MONDE PLACE CONTREESCARPE !!
FAITES TOURNER IL FAUT QUE TOUT LE MONDE VOIT !!#ViolencesPolicieres #1erMaipic.twitter.com/Dabr6HHwyJ

— Taha Bouhafs? (@T_Bouhafs) May 1, 2018

 

 
Posted

Two things:

 

1. I don't think you get the "Walkaway" idea.

 

2. Your post just shows what fascists those "liberal" supporters of Macron are.

Posted
9 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Two things:

 

1. I don't think you get the "Walkaway" idea.

 

2. Your post just shows what fascists those "liberal" supporters of Macron are.

 

do they have a grasp of how the French divide their powers federally?

 

Posted

polls, useless totally, don't realize that no African-American is going to admit they are GOP or moving over to it.

 

the privacy of the voting booth is all that matters

 

so keep saying there is nothing here.... assumed 99% voting Dem and never thinking about or actually switching...  :D

 

 

Posted
Just now, row_33 said:

polls, useless totally, don't realize that no African-American is going to admit they are GOP or moving over to it.

 

the privacy of the voting booth is all that matters

 

so keep saying there is nothing here.... assumed 99% voting Dem and never thinking about or actually switching...  :D

 

 

 

More broadly, when the left is shaming Republicans into not admitting they're Republicans, they're introducing an inherent inaccuracy into polls by making it less likely Republicans will respond honestly...or at all.

 

The left thinks they're "winning" by silencing the right, and use polls as proof...when they're simply introducing bias in to the polls.  Probably not much, maybe a 1% skew.  But that 1% is the difference between "Hillary polling well" and "Hillary winning."

Posted
3 hours ago, njbuff said:

I wonder if there are a significant number of the walkaways to make a difference in November?

 

There certainly was last November.  Once Bernie was eliminated by the Democrat party , many walked away and voted for Trump. Even many that voted for Barack.

Posted

Trump's racist judicial  nominee is forced to walk away

Quote

 

In an extraordinarily rare move on Thursday afternoon, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) withdrew a circuit court judge nomination after Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) indicated that he would not vote for the nominee, causing other Republican senators to follow suit.

According to a GOP source familiar with the matter, Scott, the only black Republican senator, raised concerns to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) about Ryan Bounds’ college writings which allegedly included racially charged comments and other controversial statements.

Rubio, the source said, pledged to vote against Bounds alongside Scott, and “more Republicans [were] heading to ‘no’” on the nomination as a result.

McConnell then withdrew the nomination—but not before huddling with his top deputy, Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-TX), in his office off the Senate floor. The saga unfolded just minutes before the scheduled 1:45 p.m. vote. By 2:30 p.m., it was over.

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-sen-tim-scott-tanks-trump-nominee-over-past-racist-remarks?ref=home

3 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

There certainly was last November.  Once Bernie was eliminated by the Democrat party , many walked away and voted for Trump. Even many that voted for Barack.

The voters eliminated Bernie, not the party. Shibboleths sure spread easy among you guys

×
×
  • Create New...