Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Posted August 13, 2018 18 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: I would say that the #WalkAway movement is misguided...but then, that would require the memes to be of real people, not stock photos with quotes on them. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/walkaway-campaign-stock-photos/ Yes. I fact check. ... With Snopes. 1
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 13 minutes ago, row_33 said: yes, you can see the difference that NOBODY else can... the haters can't use the lack of a wall against Trump because they don't want a wall in the first place... oh wait, they can..... keep stepping on those rakes... I'm not upset at the lack of the wall. That he hasn't done it doesn't bother me other than the obvious broken promise that you lot seem to not care about. The Wall is a monumentally stupid idea. It deserves a literally monument, one in a museum, for the crystallization of stupidity that it is. For one, it is probably the least conservative thing ever. It is a massive publics work project, that overrules multiple states. It requires seizing land from citizens via Eminent Domain. Enforcing and maintaining it would require epic deployment of manpower and tax dollars. I would have sworn that a liberal had proposed it. And for all that, it is almost certain to be ineffective. Cartels use catapults to launch their drug shipments over walls. They have excavated tunnels under the ground. The wall does not effect sea travel, and it's been said that the easiest to way to smuggle a WMB into the US is in a bushel of marijuana via our seaports. It does not stop cartels from using mules to fly to Canada and come in over that border. There is no current way to effectively search every car going through our checkpoints along the southern border. Ineptitude. Graft. Pork barrel spending. It is everything that made me want to walk away from the Dems, bundled up in one package. 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... With Snopes. A...well regarded fact checker service? This disturbs you? Things are beginning to make sense here.
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Posted August 13, 2018 25 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: A...well regarded fact checker service? This disturbs you? Things are beginning to make sense here. Snopes is only a well regarded fact checker service if you don't do your due dillegence into their operation. Then again, a person who outsources their fact checking to a third party isn't a person who actually cares about the quality of information they're getting. Based on the canards you're throwing around this morning it's clear you fall into that category. Intellectual laziness passed off as virtue signaling. You're making quite a show of your ignorance, white Walker.
GG Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 27 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: A...well regarded fact checker service? This disturbs you? Things are beginning to make sense here. Well regarded by whom? Are their fact checks completely unbiased? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Posted August 13, 2018 Just now, GG said: Well regarded by whom? Are their fact checks completely unbiased? I wouldn't expect an honest answer. After all, he stated he "fact checks".. then cited a third party who actually did the fact checking. Lazy and dishonest, that's how he rolls.
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-working-end-human-trafficking/ 1
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Posted August 13, 2018 39 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: A...well regarded fact checker service? This disturbs you? Things are beginning to make sense here. https://www.google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/amp/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html "Well regarded".
boyst Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 1 hour ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Oh, this is going to be fun. I'll be linking a lot to Politifact. "Kids in cages" is the quippy way to describe children being separated from their parents, taking away legal guardianship and adopting them out, but as I type that out it's much worse. The word choice comes from the original Associated Press article. Not some left wing crazy person blog. https://www.apnews.com/9794de32d39d4c6f89fbefaea3780769 This was not done in Obama's term. They were minors who didn't have parents and who came over themselves. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/25/brad-parscale/tyes-immigrant-children-detained-under-obama-they-/ The situation was begun under Donald Trump, and when the heat was on, he claimed he couldn't fix it and that it was Democratic law. This was false. He said that an executive order couldn't stop it. Then he did just that. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/25/brad-parscale/tyes-immigrant-children-detained-under-obama-they-/ I know the idea of children in cages must give you a hard on, but this one lies heavily with 45. Also false. You can argue that he didn't do enough, but hey, try to be at least factual next time: https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/dec/12/2017-lie-year-russian-election-interference-made-s/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/aug/17/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-charlottesville-counter-protest/ Well, there is him defending the white nationalists who swarmed over a college campus with torches and beating up students. "There were people in that rally. I looked the night before. If you look, they were people protesting very quietly the taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee. I am sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day, it looked like they had some rough, bad people, neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest and very legally protest. "Because I don’t know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn’t have a permit. So I only tell you this. There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country, a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country." I'm a much bigger fan of NPR and the BBC, thank you very much. Enjoy your facts! See Obama's cyber chief saying he had direct orders to stand down. See the FBI among others offering help to the DNC which wasn't even hacked. Obama let nothing happen The photo of the kids in the cage is from 2013, iirc, and there are many affidavits of such treatment going back a while, including direct quotes of Obama discussing all of this. Further, Obama released undocumented families without verification allowing predatory immigration. You Source in the AP saying they're not biased is ridiculous, they're very bias. further you prove that you have the intellectual capacity of a second grader that or you feeble-minded moron to believe that Trump actually has the authority to change the law. Executive orders are not changing the law, Obama was a lazy piece of **** never actually change the law because he knew he could not do so; instead deferring to an EO that doesn't do anything. Then the butthurt left proclamations of unfairness make it laughable when Congress had how many years with Obama to change the law? Congress - the legislature - makes the laws. Trump, the head executive, is responsible bfor making sure laws are enforced. So, when Obama was too damn sorry to enforce laws and Trump actually does the job he was elected to do by this country of Americans who chose him you must realize he is doing a damn good job. And the quote, I'd protest the removal of the confederate statue in my town if it was removed. I'd be displeased because the action means nothing. It honors those who chose to defend their freedoms in a time when freedom meant something. And in this area those that fought were not slave owners. An overwhelming amount of this area was pro union but fought for the confederacy. Majority of those were anti slavery because they took hard to score jobs in the western Carolinas that they needed for their family. But, yeah, I don't even needs terrible links to continue this argument. Links and articles don't state facts. They're fake news.
Koko78 Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 6 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Well, I walked away from the Democrats and became and Independent. Then, the Republicans nominated the most corrupt person imaginable. And then he was endorsed by the KKK and neo-Nazi's. And then he won. And then he defended Nazis while courting their vote, raised the costs of health care, gave tax cuts to the super rich while adding sunset clauses to the ones for the middle class (and that is his greatest accomplishment), and decided to put children in cages all while crying about how it's the fault of the big nasty Democrats. And now, it's been revealed that he actively knew about attempts by a foreign superpower to provide intel on his opponent. And that is just what he has admitted to. (After repeatedly changing his story) So yeah, he's made a wonderful case as to why I should go back. Well, for an "independent", you sure let the DNC talking points memos do your thinking for you. 2
DC Tom Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-working-end-human-trafficking/ Which is a major input in to immigration policy. The administration's immigration policy is to enforce the law as written specifically intended to encourage - if not force - Congress to do their jobs and reform the law. 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Which is a major input in to immigration policy. The administration's immigration policy is to enforce the law as written specifically intended to encourage - if not force - Congress to do their jobs and reform the law. Exactly correct. 1
KD in CA Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 7 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Well, I walked away from the Democrats and became and Independent. Then, the Republicans nominated the most corrupt person imaginable. I stopped reading here. Anyone who can't acknowledge the Democrats nominated the most corrupt person imaginable is pathetic. 3
DC Tom Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, KD in CA said: I stopped reading here. Anyone who can't acknowledge the Democrats nominated the most corrupt person imaginable is pathetic. Surprised you got that far. I stopped reading at "WhitewalkerInPhilly." 3
donbb Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 35 minutes ago, KD in CA said: I stopped reading here. Anyone who can't acknowledge the Democrats nominated the most corrupt person imaginable is pathetic. BUT HILLARY is so corrupt, her biggest political enemy, with a majority in both the house and senate, can't bring 1 specific charge against her. That's pathetic. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Posted August 13, 2018 Helps when you have the DOJ and FBI in your pocket. Not to mention the White House. But details never matter to a man with no interest in the truth as Gary continues to prove over and over again. 1
Koko78 Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Helps when you have the DOJ and FBI in your pocket. Not to mention the White House. But details never matter to a man with no interest in the truth as Gary continues to prove over and over again. You mean it isn't forthright and ethical for the FBI to decide that she's not guilty before they bother to begin the investigation? 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 12 minutes ago, donbb said: BUT HILLARY is so corrupt, her biggest political enemy, with a majority in both the house and senate, can't bring 1 specific charge against her. That's pathetic. What will you do when the charges start to come fast and furious, Gary? 1
donbb Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: What will you do when the charges start to come fast and furious, Gary? Bow to Lord Trump and off with my head
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Posted August 13, 2018 In other words, more honest words, that means Gary will once again run away, change screen names and hope to return unnoticed.
3rdnlng Posted August 13, 2018 Posted August 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: In other words, more honest words, that means Gary will once again run away, change screen names and hope to return unnoticed. Isn't he in danger of running out of names?
Recommended Posts