row_33 Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 15 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Rush order to the GPO. they have a staff of 50 who do nothing put paint protest signs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 28, 2018 Author Share Posted June 28, 2018 Yes, the conservative judges are the ones who will shred the constitution. She's going to be running. She's the only one in the party who can run. And she'll get slaughtered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 More Kamala hilarity.................... Kamala Harris DRAGGED for getting all big and bad with Trump about SCOTUS nominees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 13 minutes ago, B-Man said: More Kamala hilarity.................... Kamala Harris DRAGGED for getting all big and bad with Trump about SCOTUS nominees That's Trump's line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 28, 2018 Author Share Posted June 28, 2018 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 ANALYSIS: TRUE. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: ANALYSIS: TRUE. . it's their big needless babyish blowup of the fortnight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: ANALYSIS: TRUE. . Or perhaps the legislature isn't exercising enough. Don't ask SCOTUS to fix your bad legislation. Pass better legislation. God, Democrats are such helpless whiny-ass babies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 8 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Or perhaps the legislature isn't exercising enough. Don't ask SCOTUS to fix your bad legislation. Pass better legislation. God, Democrats are such helpless whiny-ass babies. so that's it for caging the illegal kids? on to another crisis? Trump should dick around for 2 months on this one, just to keep them boiling their bottoms 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 I love how Crhis Matthews and others are saying we should wait until after the election so the "the voters can decide" who will decide on voting for or against Trump's nominee. Hello, they already did. What about the people that voted for their Senator 5 years ago? Are their voices no longer important or valid? Has a senators term been shortened to 5 1/2 years somewhere along the way that I just didn't hear about? The people elected you, do your job even if it does get in the way of raising money and campaigning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 12 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: I love how Crhis Matthews and others are saying we should wait until after the election so the "the voters can decide" who will decide on voting for or against Trump's nominee. Hello, they already did. What about the people that voted for their Senator 5 years ago? Are their voices no longer important or valid? Has a senators term been shortened to 5 1/2 years somewhere along the way that I just didn't hear about? The people elected you, do your job even if it does get in the way of raising money and campaigning. i need closed caption for Matthews, all i hear is BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH in a fake angry bully tone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 9 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: I love how Crhis Matthews and others are saying we should wait until after the election so the "the voters can decide" who will decide on voting for or against Trump's nominee. Hello, they already did. What about the people that voted for their Senator 5 years ago? Are their voices no longer important or valid? Has a senators term been shortened to 5 1/2 years somewhere along the way that I just didn't hear about? The people elected you, do your job even if it does get in the way of raising money and campaigning. I think he was referring to the Garland pick that McConnell refused to have a vote on which was unprecedented. He justified it by citing a hypothetical situation that Biden came up with a while back. The difference I guess is it was a presidential election year. Plus, the GOP controlled the House and Senate. I liked the balance on the Supreme Court the way it was with Kennedy being the swing vote, but it is what it is. Who's the swing vote now? Roberts probably. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 17 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: I love how Crhis Matthews and others are saying we should wait until after the election so the "the voters can decide" who will decide on voting for or against Trump's nominee. Hello, they already did. What about the people that voted for their Senator 5 years ago? Are their voices no longer important or valid? Has a senators term been shortened to 5 1/2 years somewhere along the way that I just didn't hear about? The people elected you, do your job even if it does get in the way of raising money and campaigning. I'm considering a Senate run, on the platform of "I'm an adult." The Democrats don't realize they're letting their actions be dictated by Mitch McConnell's !@#$ery, do they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Ya right. The religious right is happy, that's for sure. Are you saying this is a poli multi issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 6 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: I think he was referring to the Garland pick that McConnell refused to have a vote on which was unprecedented. He justified it by citing a hypothetical situation that Biden came up with a while back. The difference I guess is it was a presidential election year. Plus, the GOP controlled the House and Senate. I liked the balance on the Supreme Court the way it was with Kennedy being the swing vote, but it is what it is. Who's the swing vote now? Roberts probably. NO, he's talking about this year. Right here, right now to quote a Bills philosopher. I also find it funny that Kagan was confirmed in August 2010. I guess the people didn't get to decide on that one. This should be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 4 hours ago, joesixpack said: Makes you wonder how they were able to mobilize such an event so quickly...SIGNS INCLUDED. I'm tiring of the charade that is the two parties that run this country. welcome to the club, better late than never. repeat after me.... it's a dog and pony show.... it's a dog and pony show.... it's a dog and pony show.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 1 minute ago, reddogblitz said: NO, he's talking about this year. Right here, right now to quote a Bills philosopher. I also find it funny that Kagan was confirmed in August 2010. I guess the people didn't get to decide on that one. This should be fun. Aren't you a liberal? You're taking a pretty hard line anti-Democrat position on this. You might get kicked out of Die Partei if you keep thinking for yourself. Gatorman might report you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 7 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: I think he was referring to the Garland pick that McConnell refused to have a vote on which was unprecedented. He justified it by citing a hypothetical situation that Biden came up with a while back. The difference I guess is it was a presidential election year. Plus, the GOP controlled the House and Senate. I liked the balance on the Supreme Court the way it was with Kennedy being the swing vote, but it is what it is. Who's the swing vote now? Roberts probably. Can you imagine a right to ban abortion? That will now become a major issue in state elections. Or a national law law to ban abortion? Presidents will have to weigh in on supporting or denouncing it. Gay rights could go backwards, too. This will be fun to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Ya right. The religious right is happy, that's for sure. Are you saying this is a poli multi issue? No, it's more up your line, it's a onesie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Aren't you a liberal? You're taking a pretty hard line anti-Democrat position on this. You might get kicked out of Die Partei if you keep thinking for yourself. Gatorman might report you. Seig heil! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts