B-Man Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 If Conservatives can't quickly settle on a judge that moderates will agree to, this could get pushed off till....after the election!! If Dems take control then that's it, no judge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 chauncey devega ✔ @chaunceydevega Kennedy gone from the U.S. Supreme Court. Yup. Hillary and Trump were the same. Thank you Bernie types who sat out because of spite. All that white economic anxiety folks. Trump's Supreme Court will have their own version of the Dred Scott decision. That is the best!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 ReddFoxx.... hmmmm.. the best anecdotes are on his TV show he had on a boxer and instead of pulling the punch he hit Redd good on the jaw. Redd bounced up, in his velvet tux and pulled a knife out in 3 seconds. Another time the show began and he was introduced but didn't hit his cue, an assistant ran to his dressing room and found Redd in ummm.... oral congress with a young woman, and when interrupted Redd said "can't a man get some privacy?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 27, 2018 Author Share Posted June 27, 2018 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MILFHUNTER#518 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: What issues do you hope the new solid Conservative majority will rule on? Trump hates Gowdy NYSRPA will take a challenge to the SAFE ACT to a conservative Supreme Court And I did not know that (RE: Gowdy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 27, 2018 Author Share Posted June 27, 2018 Just now, MILFHUNTER#518 said: NYSRPA will take a challenge to the SAFE ACT to a conservative Supreme Court And I did not know that (RE: Gowdy) He's wrong about Trump/Gowdy, unsurprisingly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 Elise Johnson @Peanut_Johnson 50m50 minutes ago Make no mistake this IS the worst case scenario for women, minorities, and the environment. Justice kennedy was a swing seat for gay rights and racial discrimination. Giving up his seat before midterms is disgraceful. Not that there was anything wrong with that..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 Just now, MILFHUNTER#518 said: NYSRPA will take a challenge to the SAFE ACT to a conservative Supreme Court And I did not know that (RE: Gowdy) A magazine case? Ok I could actually see a Liberal judge appointed here. If Cons can't get this over the goal line in time and lose Senate in November, it will be the next president that picks this judge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 Kiddos, you are not changing the Senate to Dem power in November, they have something like 25 of the 33 up for grabs, that's very bad news in a less-than-popular time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He's wrong about Trump/Gowdy, unsurprisingly... No, I'm right you are a dingbat Hillary has already won, Kim and Trump already have a deal, you are sh it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 and no matter how it stacks up, there are never going to overturn Roe v Wade, besides the states that allow the vast majority of abortions have already sealed off the legality permamnently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 Kennedy is/was the most moderate on the court now. A trump replacement won't swing the court much in the conservative direction except that a true conservative and and a much younger one will be on board for much longer. Ginsberg may die on the bench. She's too stubborn to retire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 9 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Kennedy is/was the most moderate on the court now. A trump replacement won't swing the court much in the conservative direction except that a true conservative and and a much younger one will be on board for much longer. Ginsberg may die on the bench. She's too stubborn to retire. that would be gross if she died RIGHT THERE!!! just don't give us another stealth liberal under the guise of a Conservative Justice..... Souter was a total disaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 CHUCK SCHUMER: ‘Height of Hypocrisy’ if McConnell Doesn’t Stall Supreme Court Nomination Like 2016. The Biden Rule applies to presidential election years, Senator, but I think you know that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MILFHUNTER#518 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 21 minutes ago, Tiberius said: A magazine case? Ok I could actually see a Liberal judge appointed here. If Cons can't get this over the goal line in time and lose Senate in November, it will be the next president that picks this judge SAFE ACT is more than just mag capacity bro... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 A preview from tonight on CNN/MSNBC 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Talk about political suicide... Also, this is huge news. Bigger than most people care to admit. Edited June 27, 2018 by Paulus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Paulus said: Talk about political suicide... Also, this is huge news. Bigger than most people care to admit. Could be political suicide putting a right wing nut bag on too. This will be a Trump pick, Flake and Corker might not care, they are not running again, and Heller might be afraid of losing his seat if he votes for the nominee. Then there is the filibuster... hey, this is why we like politics, right? https://www.thedailybeast.com/chris-matthews-hell-to-pay-if-democrats-dont-block-kennedy-replacement?ref=home Quote MSNBC’s Chris Matthews did not mince words in reacting to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s surprise retirement announcement on Wednesday. “I don’t think the Democrats should allow meetings to occur with Trump’s nominee to fill this vacancy by Justice Kennedy,” Matthews said. “I think they have to fight eye for an eye for what happened in ‘16 when the Republicans, led by Mitch McConnell, refused to even consider or even meet with Merrick Garland.” If the Democratic leadership under Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer “allows this to go forward,” Matthews continued, they are going to have a “huge problem with the Democratic base.” He pointed to incumbent Congressman Joe Crowley’s loss the night before to young progressive Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a sign of just how vulnerable the establishment wing of the Democratic Party is right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 47 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So conformation hearings before the elections?? This will also be around the time Manafort's trial is going on and perhaps the release of Mueller's report. I just wonder if they do find out the election (2016) has indeed been fixed will there will be a remedy for these illegitimate appointments to the court to stand or will more judges be added to the court. Next nominee will be grilled on self-pardons, ignoring subpoena and what happens if a president does ignore one, obstruction and criminal intent and religious liberty, is it only for white protestant christians? It's happy time! Libs are unhappy, and that's the only reason to be happy. You've offered expert analysis and a compelling reason for the Trump admin to move slowly through this process. On your behalf I have called the White House to urge restraint in nominating the next Justice to the Supreme Court. The person I spoke with went to ask. .....hold for POTUS reply.... ....still holding....there seems to be a lot of discussion on this issue.... ....still on hold, My God you may have gotten their attention with the white protestant Christian line! They think it will play well in Peoria.... ...someone just picked up... Darn it. POTUS thought about it but decided to go in a different direction. He did say something like if things go south he'll let Mike decide. So close, so so close. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts