ALF Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 Collins: Won't support SCOTUS pick hostile to abortion rights Washington (CNN)Republican Sen. Susan Collins, a key vote in the coming Supreme Court confirmation fight, said Sunday she would not support a nominee hostile to the landmark abortion ruling in Roe v. Wade "The President really was soliciting my views on the type of nominee that I was looking for," Collins said. "I emphasized that I wanted a nominee who would respect precedent, a fundamental tenet of our judicial system." https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/01/politics/susan-collins-supreme-court/index.html McCain uncertain to be available to vote
IDBillzFan Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 54 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: But I'm the pathetic one for laughing at these nutbags. 3
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 20 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: But I'm the pathetic one for laughing at these nutbags. They’re not just nutbags, they’re dangerous.
row_33 Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 American exceptionalism is one thing, elite liberal American exceptionalism is getting roasted by the second....
IDBillzFan Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 9 minutes ago, joesixpack said: They’re not just nutbags, they’re dangerous. I'm not afraid of people who genuinely don't believe in anyone owning a firearm.
row_33 Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 They better hope it’s done when it 49-51, come 2019 it might be a GOP Senate supermajority
PearlHowardman Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 6 hours ago, ALF said: Collins: Won't support SCOTUS pick hostile to abortion rights Washington (CNN)Republican Sen. Susan Collins, a key vote in the coming Supreme Court confirmation fight, said Sunday she would not support a nominee hostile to the landmark abortion ruling in Roe v. Wade "The President really was soliciting my views on the type of nominee that I was looking for," Collins said. "I emphasized that I wanted a nominee who would respect precedent, a fundamental tenet of our judicial system." https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/01/politics/susan-collins-supreme-court/index.html Bravo! We need more planned parenthood clinics in targeted areas. Margaret Sanger
B-Man Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 Quote Jeffrey ToobinVerified account @JeffreyToobin FollowFollow @JeffreyToobin See the new @USSupremeCourt clearly: Abortion illegal; doctors prosecuted; gay people barred from restaurants, hotels, stores; African-Americans out of elite schools; gun control banned in 50 states; the end of regulatory state. My @NewYorker column. Please remember that this hysterical lunatic is one of CNN’s primary Supreme Court analysts... Also.........is he saying that African Americans cannot be in elite schools except by the help of SCOTUS? .
IDBillzFan Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: Please remember that this hysterical lunatic is one of CNN’s primary Supreme Court analysts... Also.........is he saying that African Americans cannot be in elite schools except by the help of SCOTUS? . But hey...I'm the pathetic one for laughing at these asshats.
DC Tom Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 21 minutes ago, B-Man said: Please remember that this hysterical lunatic is one of CNN’s primary Supreme Court analysts... Also.........is he saying that African Americans cannot be in elite schools except by the help of SCOTUS? . His twitter account has a banner that says "From the bestselling author whose book The Run of His Life inspired the FX drama "The People vs. O.J. Simpson..." Really? Like no one ever thought about a docu-drama about OJ until he wrote a book? Could he be any more of a self-centered little twerp? 1
IDBillzFan Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 19 minutes ago, DC Tom said: His twitter account has a banner that says "From the bestselling author whose book The Run of His Life inspired the FX drama "The People vs. O.J. Simpson..." Really? Like no one ever thought about a docu-drama about OJ until he wrote a book? Could he be any more of a self-centered little twerp? In all fairness, if you work at CNN, it's a little hard to get attention...what with Jim Acosta yelling at everyone all the time. 2
B-Man Posted July 1, 2018 Posted July 1, 2018 Nice career you’ve got there. Be a shame if anything happened to it. Democrat Senator: Vote for Trump’s SCOTUS pick and your career is toast (video)
B-Man Posted July 3, 2018 Posted July 3, 2018 ARE YOU NOW OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A MEMBER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? Democrats Are Increasingly Comfortable With Religious Tests. As another religion with its headquarters in Italy liked to say, “Tutto all’interno dello stato, niente fuori dallo stato, nulla contro lo stato.” https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/300977/
Tiberius Posted July 3, 2018 Posted July 3, 2018 The Federalist Society has picked its list for Trump. There needs to be a complete and transparent look at what this society is using to pick these people, what financial dealings the leaders of this society have before the courts, what discussions were had in relation to the pick. The pick also also needs to promise to recuse themselves from any matters relating to Trumps criminal investigation. A criminal cannot be allowed to choose the judges that might have to rule on self-pardons, ignoring subpoenas, pardoning his buddies and other issues of executive privilege.
row_33 Posted July 3, 2018 Posted July 3, 2018 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The Federalist Society has picked its list for Trump. There needs to be a complete and transparent look at what this society is using to pick these people, what financial dealings the leaders of this society have before the courts, what discussions were had in relation to the pick. The pick also also needs to promise to recuse themselves from any matters relating to Trumps criminal investigation. A criminal cannot be allowed to choose the judges that might have to rule on self-pardons, ignoring subpoenas, pardoning his buddies and other issues of executive privilege. not necessary maybe not at all, dead wrong.
Tiberius Posted July 3, 2018 Posted July 3, 2018 Just now, row_33 said: not necessary maybe not at all, dead wrong. You are a drunken POS who can't even ignore me correctly. You have said time and again I was on ignore, now put me on ignore and go drink yourself into another stupor and pass out of the park bench and don't reply to my posts.
row_33 Posted July 3, 2018 Posted July 3, 2018 25 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are a drunken POS who can't even ignore me correctly. You have said time and again I was on ignore, now put me on ignore and go drink yourself into another stupor and pass out of the park bench and don't reply to my posts. you can't honestly be this sad of a human being God bless you anyway
dpberr Posted July 3, 2018 Posted July 3, 2018 It amazes me that the fringe on both sides still gets anxious over Roe v. Wade in 2018. The Supreme Court isn't going to touch that case ever again, regardless of who is on it. They aren't in the business of overturning one of their own decisions. It'd be like rewriting a chapter of the Bible to "reflect modern viewpoints." 1
Recommended Posts