DC Tom Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Paulus said: And, we still need the fed to tell us all that Illegal Aliens vote. Right, if this isn't encouraging treason... Pretty sure registering illegal aliens to vote in school board elections does not even come close to "treason."
Paulus Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Pretty sure registering illegal aliens to vote in school board elections does not even come close to "treason." But, when does the line get drawn with respect to encouraging the practice of illegally voting in our elections? Honestly, I don't think there is anything* actionable, but when everyone is yelling "treason" I think mine is as valid of a point as any. Edited July 19, 2018 by Paulus 1
row_33 Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 treason now means you choose a different flavour of ice cream than a liberal
3rdnlng Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 25 minutes ago, row_33 said: treason now means you choose a different flavour of ice cream than a liberal If that's true then I am treasonous. I refuse to eat Feckless Chunks.
row_33 Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 10 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: If that's true then I am treasonous. I refuse to eat Feckless Chunks. never enough pistachio almond
DC Tom Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 42 minutes ago, Paulus said: But, when does the line get drawn with respect to encouraging the practice of illegally voting in our elections? It's not illegal for illegal aliens to vote in school board elections, if the municipality responsibility for that school board says it's legal. There's no federal law against illegal aliens voting in local elections. The line between "legal" and "illegal" is pretty sharp and bright: "illegal" is against the law. "Legal" isn't. 44 minutes ago, Paulus said: Honestly, I don't think there is anything* actionable, but when everyone is yelling "treason" I think mine is as valid of a point as any. The histrionic idiocy of others does not validate your point. If anything, it makes you an equivalent histrionic idiot.
3rdnlng Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 33 minutes ago, DC Tom said: It's not illegal for illegal aliens to vote in school board elections, if the municipality responsibility for that school board says it's legal. There's no federal law against illegal aliens voting in local elections. The line between "legal" and "illegal" is pretty sharp and bright: "illegal" is against the law. "Legal" isn't. The histrionic idiocy of others does not validate your point. If anything, it makes you an equivalent histrionic idiot. It used to be that you'd call him an erudite poster and be thankful that he was here at PPP. Where are your manners?
Paulus Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: It's not illegal for illegal aliens to vote in school board elections, if the municipality responsibility for that school board says it's legal. There's no federal law against illegal aliens voting in local elections. The line between "legal" and "illegal" is pretty sharp and bright: "illegal" is against the law. "Legal" isn't. The histrionic idiocy of others does not validate your point. If anything, it makes you an equivalent histrionic idiot. I would argue that it encourages illegal behavior(voting in other elections), if I wanted to press the point. That said, I do think you are ignorant of my sardonic personality, and perhaps missed my point entirely. Edited July 19, 2018 by Paulus
DC Tom Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 2 hours ago, Paulus said: I would argue that it encourages illegal behavior(voting in other elections), if I wanted to press the point. That said, I do think you are ignorant of my sardonic personality, and perhaps missed my point entirely. If, by definition, it's legal behavior... Ah, !@#$ it. Just go pretend you're right. I don't care. The length of this discussion has exceeded my interest in it.
Paulus Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: If, by definition, it's legal behavior... Ah, !@#$ it. Just go pretend you're right. I don't care. The length of this discussion has exceeded my interest in it. I am sorry the ellipsis was not enough to clue you in on the sarcasm. From now on, just consider them and indicator or just continue to think your the highest functioning autist in the room. 7 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: It used to be that you'd call him an erudite poster and be thankful that he was here at PPP. Where are your manners? Yeah, Tom's mastery of the Divergent series is dauntless.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted July 24, 2018 Author Posted July 24, 2018 On 7/13/2018 at 9:55 AM, DC Tom said: Yep. Combating child trafficking is a huge motivation for this program. That's not what the Trump administration is saying. They admit its all about deterrence http://thehill.com/latino/393000-hhs-official-says-family-separation-policy-will-have-deterrence-effect https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/06/19/here-are-the-administration-officials-who-have-said-that-family-separation-is-meant-as-a-deterrent/?utm_term=.43732835e789
B-Man Posted July 24, 2018 Posted July 24, 2018 Democrats Prove Willing To Make Orphans Casualties In Their War Against Religion. “Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee made it clear: they would rather see children suffer than tolerate the existence of faith-based adoption and foster-care providers.” .
B-Man Posted July 26, 2018 Posted July 26, 2018 Dem Rep. Joe Crowley: We need to talk about “compensation” for families who were separated at the border Wut?
row_33 Posted July 26, 2018 Posted July 26, 2018 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: Dem Rep. Joe Crowley: We need to talk about “compensation” for families who were separated at the border Wut? Steal more $$ from people who work
DC Tom Posted July 26, 2018 Posted July 26, 2018 50 minutes ago, B-Man said: Dem Rep. Joe Crowley: We need to talk about “compensation” for families who were separated at the border Wut? I think maybe he should compensate his constituents for being separated from representation. 2
keepthefaith Posted July 26, 2018 Posted July 26, 2018 53 minutes ago, B-Man said: Dem Rep. Joe Crowley: We need to talk about “compensation” for families who were separated at the border Wut? Well, he lost his primary to the new socialist. Maybe he's just now realizing he needs to make a hard left turn to save face just in case he runs for Mayor of NYC or something like that in the future.
IDBillzFan Posted July 26, 2018 Posted July 26, 2018 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Dem Rep. Joe Crowley: We need to talk about “compensation” for families who were separated at the border Wut? Dem posters here...are you good with this idea? Chime in, please.
Doc Brown Posted July 26, 2018 Posted July 26, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Dem posters here...are you good with this idea? Chime in, please. I think he's out of his god damn mind. This party has lost its mind on illegal immigration. It was only twelve years ago when Obama, Hillary, and Schumer voted for a border fence. Edited July 26, 2018 by Doc Brown 1
Kelly101 Posted July 29, 2018 Posted July 29, 2018 Heres tib or another one of those bots, this one lurks on breitbart: Clemzilla • 6 hours ago One really need look no further than our southern border. When a man uses family separation as a foreign policy tool, he's pretty much as vile as can be. What should have been an absolute last resort was gleefully enacted by Executive Order, most likely because: 1. Congress would never pass such an abomination 2. Congress would, but it would take to long. I hope the world never stops reminding itself what was done to these people. There's one right of the top of my head. That one should be enough. Return of service/ ace. Later. as tibs might say... tee hee
Recommended Posts