Jump to content

Summit Predictions


Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, baskin said:

 

Trump hasn't done anything different than the Bushes, Clinton and Obama - NK has pledged before to come correct...and ultimately didn't....maybe this sounds different....maybe this will turn out different...who knows.....based on Trump as POTUS record of accomplishing anything substantive...

 

AFA keeping troops...you do realize that NK has troops on the border as well as weapons directed at SK? You do know that there exists a formal war declaration? You do know that the troops represent an important military presence in the South Pacific....keeping NK and China in check.....you do know that our friends SK and Japan want them there right?.....of course you knew all that....

 

 

lol...you got nothing dude....absolutely nothing

 

 

 

 

Someone's drinking the haterade.

 

You HATE that he's succeeding where Hussein failed.

 

obama_bow_1381505c.jpg

 

or

 

640x-1.jpg

 

Hm.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

To Trump supporters, a nice photo op is success. 

 

it's illustrative.

 

the "man" in the first picture going full beta. The man in the second picture, projecting strength to a historical enemy after bringing him to the bargaining table.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joesixpack said:

 

it's illustrative.

 

the "man" in the first picture going full beta. The man in the second picture, projecting strength to a historical enemy after bringing him to the bargaining table.

 

Trump brought him? Or Kim got Trump to recognize the dictator with a great show? And Obama didn't start fights with our friends. But anything Trump does you guys will cheer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump brought him? Or Kim got Trump to recognize the dictator with a great show? And Obama didn't start fights with our friends. But anything Trump does you guys will cheer. 

 

You're right, Obama didn't.

 

TO OUR DETRIMENT.

 

He bent over on trade, on the iran deal, on just about anything the euros wanted. That's why they loved him. He had no spine.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump brought him? Or Kim got Trump to recognize the dictator with a great show? And Obama didn't start fights with our friends. But anything Trump does you guys will cheer. 

I just hate to legitimize you by responding but Trump's sanctions were what brought Kim to the table. Add in Trump's declarations that NK would never become a bona fide nuclear power by threatening war. It's as simple as that. It's nice to have a Churchill as our leader versus the Chamberlain that was Obama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A leftist’s take on the summit

 

Damon Linker argues that there are three potential outcomes of the Trump-Kim summit, none of which is good. The article provides an amusing illustration of how twisted the anti-Trump left has become.

 

One outcome, says Linker, is a “modest” deal, akin to the one President Clinton reached with North Korea. Normally, says Linker, this would be a good outcome because it would avert war, at least for a while. But because Trump is being advised by hawkish Mike Pompeo and John Bolton, Trump will promptly declare North Korea out of compliance lead us into war. So says Linker.

 

A another outcome is no deal. According to Linker, in this scenario war “moves from likely to a near certainty.”

 

The final possible outcome is a deal in which North Korea agrees to denuclearize. Surely, that’s a decent outcome, no?

 

Not for Linker. In this scenario, “Republicans would be well-placed to hold onto Congress in November — and Trump himself would be strongly situated to mount a successful bid for re-election in 2020.”

 

Linker doesn’t say whether this would be worse than a war with North Korea.:lol:

 

MORE AT THE LINK:

 

 

 

 

 

 

US-last-v-first.jpeg?resize=556%2C600

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it very amusing that NKorea or Summit or Denuclearization aren't trending on Twitter today, I would bet that when the Presidents Twitter account misspelled the first lady's name, that trended, but not the events of today.....

 

 

image.thumb.png.92eb4abfe245f85c98ffae8c158f437c.png

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The Poojer said:

I find it very amusing that NKorea or Summit or Denuclearization aren't trending on Twitter today, I would bet that when the Presidents Twitter account misspelled the first lady's name, that trended, but not the events of today.....

 

 

image.thumb.png.92eb4abfe245f85c98ffae8c158f437c.png

 

Shadow banning and digital no-platforming are very real.

 

Internet Bill of Rights now.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Shadow banning and digital no-platforming are very real.

 

Internet Bill of Rights now.

 

And you wonder why many people think net neutrality will save the internet.

Just now, row_33 said:

social media is useless for important matters

 

 

 

What are you talking about?  Social media IS how most people process information now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

You're right, Obama didn't.

 

TO OUR DETRIMENT.

 

He bent over on trade, on the iran deal, on just about anything the euros wanted. That's why they loved him. He had no spine.

 

Ya, what Trump said, blah blah. Too bad it's all lies. You and Doc believe it though, so ok

18 minutes ago, The Poojer said:

I find it very amusing that NKorea or Summit or Denuclearization aren't trending on Twitter today, I would bet that when the Presidents Twitter account misspelled the first lady's name, that trended, but not the events of today.....

 

 

image.thumb.png.92eb4abfe245f85c98ffae8c158f437c.png

Why would denuclearization be trending anywhere? Who is giving up their nukes? Aside from how Iran gave up their ability to make them and allowed in inspectors. 

 

Gees, this is Mssion Accomplished all over again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

and then there's this ...lord this is funny even if all chopped up

 

 

Those people who think Trump met Kim without any preconditions are lacking the ability to think. There have been a ton of meetings and as our very own DR has pointed out ad nauseam that this outcome (at least up to this point) was preordained.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GG said:

 

A concession is something you give up for nothing.   Stopping military exercises is a symbolic move.  With no change in military deployment on the peninsula, the exercises can be resumed at a drop of the hat.

 

A concession would be an immediate lifting of sanctions.

Trump gave up the exercises for nothing...a concession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I just hate to legitimize you by responding but Trump's sanctions were what brought Kim to the table. Add in Trump's declarations that NK would never become a bona fide nuclear power by threatening war. It's as simple as that. It's nice to have a Churchill as our leader versus the Chamberlain that was Obama.

 

I heard our new platform is "America - Kim's Beeatch"

Edited by baskin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

Those people who think Trump met Kim without any preconditions are lacking the ability to think. There have been a ton of meetings and as our very own DR has pointed out ad nauseam that this outcome (at least up to this point) was preordained.

lighten up Francis..this is funny as hell. Crimminy, some the graphics even point to Fox not talking specifically about North Korea..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...