B-Man Posted August 31, 2020 Posted August 31, 2020 WHAT’S IN STORE FOR CALIFORNIA?: A radical race agenda, that’s what. The California Senate has now passed a bill establishing a slave reparations task force. Meanwhile, it has also approved a bill that requires race/sexual orientation quotas for corporate boards of directors. A somewhat different version of the corporate board bill has already passed the Assembly, so it’s unlikely they will balk this time around. And, of course, the Legislature has already passed a bill asking voters to rip up the state constitution’s prohibition on discrimination and preferential treatment on the basis of race or sex. It’s all so breathtaking. Sorry I don’t have time to write more …
Hedge Posted September 2, 2020 Posted September 2, 2020 California SB145: Sex offenders: registration. 1
Koko78 Posted September 2, 2020 Posted September 2, 2020 12 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: So... they won a great victory by getting an injunction on a subject that the UC system was getting rid of anyhow? Well, at least California is getting rid of its anti-discrimination laws, so there's that.
Gary M Posted September 2, 2020 Posted September 2, 2020 3 hours ago, Wacka said: How soon until CA is empty? I think we are building the wall on the wrong border!! 1
B-Man Posted September 2, 2020 Posted September 2, 2020 Of course.................part of the plan. California Democrats hope Gavin Newsom will sign their bill that would take things easier on LGBT sexual predators
IDBillzFan Posted September 2, 2020 Posted September 2, 2020 8 hours ago, Wacka said: How soon until CA is empty? Looks like they're trying to keep as many Dems and Hollywood types as possible. Why not give them a free pass to have sex with minors as long as the minor consents? So to recap. Minors can't vote. Minors can't buy a gun. Minors can't drive. But keep it reasonable and it's okay to have sex with them as long as you consent within 10 years of the minor. So if you're 21, and your 12-year-old same-sex minor consents to sex, it's all good. That's how you keep Hollywood from leaving Hollywood.
ziltoid Posted September 2, 2020 Posted September 2, 2020 Just now, IDBillzFan said: Looks like they're trying to keep as many Dems and Hollywood types as possible. Why not give them a free pass to have sex with minors as long as the minor consents? So to recap. Minors can't vote. Minors can't buy a gun. Minors can't drive. But keep it reasonable and it's okay to have sex with them as long as you consent within 10 years of the minor. So if you're 21, and your 12-year-old same-sex minor consents to sex, it's all good. That's how you keep Hollywood from leaving Hollywood. So just to paint the picture, there is a range of ages where this applies: Adult Minor Low end - 21 11 High end - 30 20 Or wait, is an adult 18? Then it would be: Adult Minor Low end - 18 8 High end - 27 17 I bet you can see all the Californians doing the math as they walk around today.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted September 2, 2020 Posted September 2, 2020 10 minutes ago, BeerLeagueHockey said: So just to paint the picture, there is a range of ages where this applies: Adult Minor Low end - 21 11 High end - 30 20 Or wait, is an adult 18? Then it would be: Adult Minor Low end - 18 8 High end - 27 17 I bet you can see all the Californians doing the math as they walk around today. I could understand within like 3 years, a hs senior dating a freshman and then they continue to age. But 10 years is wild. You're talking about a PhD candidate and a HS senior on the high end. You're talking about a college freshman and a 3rd grader on the low end...
ziltoid Posted September 2, 2020 Posted September 2, 2020 4 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I could understand within like 3 years, a hs senior dating a freshman and then they continue to age. But 10 years is wild. You're talking about a PhD candidate and a HS senior on the high end. You're talking about a college freshman and a 3rd grader on the low end... Right, that high school 3-4 year window is a tough one to judge. I'm just not sure who thought 10 years was the correct number to use, weird.
Foxx Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 10 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1302776151178383361 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 2 hours ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1302776151178383361 ...another Cali chapter in "political nepotism" with special thanks to Daddy Gil......the legendary LA DA........
Orlando Buffalo Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 On 9/2/2020 at 6:22 AM, Wacka said: How soon until CA is empty? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/09/04/realestate/moving-to-florida.amp.html The only concern is they might vote like they used to, too many prefer Florida but don't understand why.
Chef Jim Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 On 9/4/2020 at 8:59 PM, B-Man said: That has always been my concern. How current are the residential records? How many people in the US are on record residing in more than one state? What if I lived in CA in January of this year and moved to FL in June and have my CA mail forwarded? Do I get two legal ballots?
Wacka Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: That has always been my concern. How current are the residential records? How many people in the US are on record residing in more than one state? What if I lived in CA in January of this year and moved to FL in June and have my CA mail forwarded? Do I get two legal ballots? Jimmy Griffin's brother (he was parks commissioner) got in trouble for that.Voted in Buffalo and Florida. Edited September 7, 2020 by Wacka
Recommended Posts