Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/9/2018 at 1:37 AM, LABillzFan said:

This is why the left is losing so badly right now.

 

Interesting, yet idiotic, take. When your politics is about winning or losing, you're an idiot.

Posted
1 minute ago, Koko78 said:

 

Sounds like Delaware is going to have a lot more corporations registered under its laws very soon.

 

Well it says where they are based not incorporated. I can see it now. XYZ Corporation moved from California because they hate women. ?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Well it says where they are based not incorporated. I can see it now. XYZ Corporation moved from California because they hate women. ?

 

The author likely doesn't know the difference. Without looking at the actual legislation (which I have zero interest in doing so), it's hard to say one way or the other.

 

However, if the criteria is "based" in CA, then everyone's 'headquarters' just moved to a PO Box in Vegas.

Posted
On 8/31/2018 at 6:18 AM, Chef Jim said:

And again.....

 

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/california-moves-to-mandate-female-board-directors-1535571904

 

Next it will be people of color, certain sexual orientation etc etc. Why is it the left that always wants to put people in boxes?  

 

The answer is simple: you need only one man on the board to say he identifies as a woman.

 

Period.

 

If children in CA public schools can get a note from their parents saying the child identifies as the opposite gender, and these children can consequently have full access to all things tied to that gender, then there is no reason it won't work in the boardroom. None.

 

Ridiculous. Yes. Will it work? Let's find out.

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

The answer is simple: you need only one man on the board to say he identifies as a woman.

 

Period.

 

If children in CA public schools can get a note from their parents saying the child identifies as the opposite gender, and these children can consequently have full access to all things tied to that gender, then there is no reason it won't work in the boardroom. None.

 

Ridiculous. Yes. Will it work? Let's find out.

 

 

I don't know why that isn't more obvious to people. 

 

I don't know why it's not more obvious to idiot California legislators who embrace the whole "gender self-identification" thing while simultaneously pushing bills that require gender to be externally defined?  How the !@#$ do they not see this?

Posted (edited)

 

What's with all the hate for Cali?

 

90% of the porn you losers beat-off to is made right here in the Golden State!

 

 

 

Edited by #34fan
Posted
35 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

What's with all the hate for Cali?

 

90% of the porn you losers beat-off to is made right here in the Golden State!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, #34fan said:

 

90% of the porn you losers beat-off to is made right here in the Golden State!

 

 

Not me.  I got sick of the "contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer" Prop 65 warnings all over 'em.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Not me.  I got sick of the "contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer" Prop 65 warnings all over 'em.

 

So you go for the fresh-squeezed Florida porn?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, DC Tom said:

I don't know why it's not more obvious to idiot California legislators who embrace the whole "gender self-identification" thing while simultaneously pushing bills that require gender to be externally defined?  How the !@#$ do they not see this?

 

Because they're too busy promoting  CA porn business to be smart enough to see the obvious.

  • 2 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...