Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Daz doing his best to one up his Biden is as sharp as a tack take.

 

Hilarious.

 

:lol:

Is that what you extrapolated from "he's pretty spry considering he's 82"?  When you lose your mind over what is clearly an undisputable comment like that, it only shows how desperate you are to try to win ANY debate.  Go to a nursing home, and see what 82 year old are like.  They don't work all day and fly all over the globe. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Despite paying the highest taxes, Californians have to rely on their own pool water. The cost of voting Democrat.

PUTIN!!

 

good heavens. Are you one of those people that also sees NAZIS around every corner? Several of your ideological allies here at PPP do. 

Posted
Just now, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

I know your thing, however odd in the situation, is to defend Gavin Newsome and ramble on a the “GQP” (how pathetically tired and lame), but please exercise some common sense. That’s a big ask, I know. Do you believe the state of Oregon subjects their fire fighting equipment to safety inspections? In a time critical situation, is a California safety inspection value added? 

Where have I defended Newsom?  Pointing out an obvious hit job isn't defending anyone, but it's hard to be told when you're the puppet.  I get that.  This is page 120(2018) of this thread, and you'd be hard pressed to find any wildfire comments up till now.  

2 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

PUTIN!!

 

good heavens. Are you one of those people that also sees NAZIS around every corner? Several of your ideological allies here at PPP do. 

I see fascist behavior, and it's concerning.  Do you think Putin is mad that we have a massive divide in our country based on 2 ideologies, which have their own "news" organizations?  Well he's not, but we should be. 

Posted
53 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Imagine trying to tarnish a guy and party so bad that people will get mad over a "safety inspection" that they know nothing about.  Keep listening to your masters.

 

Oh that's rich.  Imagine trying to make excuses for a guy and party that make you look silly.

 

It's not like this was some jamoke off-the-street firetruck.  They do have standards in other states as well. :rolleyes:

 

Posted
1 minute ago, daz28 said:

Where have I defended Newsom?  Pointing out an obvious hit job isn't defending anyone, but it's hard to be told when you're the puppet.  I get that.  This is page 120(2018) of this thread, and you'd be hard pressed to find any wildfire comments up till now.  

You should start a thread specifically about California fires if the discussion in the 6-7 year old thread troubles you. Many people in the other 49 states think California is fun to laugh at with the way they go about their business. That might be a reason for ≈ 100 of the pages. 
 

You cut and paste directly from Newsome’s website (without linking for some reason) to let everyone know how much he has done and spent. You are standing up for the guy. No need to pretend otherwise. 

Posted
Just now, Doc said:

 

Oh that's rich.  Imagine trying to make excuses for a guy and party that make you look silly.

 

It's not like this was some jamoke off-the-street firetruck.  They do have standards in other states as well. :rolleyes:

 

Show me the "excuses" I made for anyone?  I expect NC to make stuff up, but I expect better from the other posters.  I'm not a democrat, so how do I "look silly".  The topic I'm debating is the outrage at the wildfires, that suddenly appeared after trump won.  Everything on Fox will be hunky dory for 4 years, except for the stuff that happens in blue states.  There will be no caravans, no inflation or gas prices, etc.  It's all a joke of a game, and sadly I think you understand this, but still feel compelled to defend it.  Nice projection though. 

1 minute ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

You should start a thread specifically about California fires if the discussion in the 6-7 year old thread troubles you. Many people in the other 49 states think California is fun to laugh at with the way they go about their business. That might be a reason for ≈ 100 of the pages. 
 

You cut and paste directly from Newsome’s website (without linking for some reason) to let everyone know how much he has done and spent. You are standing up for the guy. No need to pretend otherwise. 

That was to dispute, I believe Orlando's, idea that they weren't "doing enough".  I have no idea if he's doing a good job on wildfires, because I wouldn't know the first thing about climate as it relates to fires, and what measure are the best bang for the buck.  You, Fox news and all the right wingers won't admit that though.  Orange man bad=Newsom bad

Posted
2 minutes ago, daz28 said:

I'm debating is the outrage at the wildfires, that suddenly appeared after trump won.

Hard to believe you hit submit reply for such drivel. Outrage appears when historic disasters are unfolding on live tv whether it be CNN, MSNBC, or the awful Fox News. You are pretending to be annoyed at politicization of the matter and proceed to type the above.
 

🤡 

Posted
Just now, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Hard to believe you hit submit reply for such drivel. Outrage appears when historic disasters are unfolding on live tv whether it be CNN, MSNBC, or the awful Fox News. You are pretending to be annoyed at politicization of the matter and proceed to type the above.
 

🤡

so you think Fox's reporting won't be changing drastically now that the GQP is in charge?  If you love talk about infrastructure week discussions and concepts of concepts of plans, you'll love it.  They do have to be sure to give their viewers a healthy plate of hate, fear, and outrage though.  You know for a fact that people are easily led by partisan outlets, but I'm a clown for bringing it up???  CNN will pivot back to every dumb thing trump says, if I need to play that game with you.  Dude, your NAME is partisan.  

Posted
16 minutes ago, daz28 said:

so you think Fox's reporting won't be changing drastically now that the GQP is in charge?  If you love talk about infrastructure week discussions and concepts of concepts of plans, you'll love it.  They do have to be sure to give their viewers a healthy plate of hate, fear, and outrage though.  You know for a fact that people are easily led by partisan outlets, but I'm a clown for bringing it up???  CNN will pivot back to every dumb thing trump says, if I need to play that game with you.  Dude, your NAME is partisan.  

You believe, as per your earlier words, that outrage over the historic damage being caused by wildfires, is related to Trump’s election. Let that sink in as you go on pretending to be non-partisan. Pitiful. 

Posted
53 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Show me the "excuses" I made for anyone?  I expect NC to make stuff up, but I expect better from the other posters.  I'm not a democrat, so how do I "look silly".  The topic I'm debating is the outrage at the wildfires, that suddenly appeared after trump won.  Everything on Fox will be hunky dory for 4 years, except for the stuff that happens in blue states.  There will be no caravans, no inflation or gas prices, etc.  It's all a joke of a game, and sadly I think you understand this, but still feel compelled to defend it.  Nice projection though.

 

Have you ever voted for a Republican?

 

And yeah, I remember seeing the MSM stop the Wuhan death counters once Biden took Office.  Ignoring there was a crisis at the border and blaming it on Republicans "pouncing."  That Biden wasn't senile and it was "cheap fakes."  That there was no inflation and it was transitory.  It's what happens, except the Dems have (or at least had) a lot of mouthpieces.

 

And not sure what your issue is here.  It's a fact that they made firetrucks from fire stations in Oregon wait to pass their inspections when time was of the essence.  That just tells me that they have no clue about the real world.

×
×
  • Create New...