daz28 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I understand your perspective and share some of your distrust, but at the end of the day—-the playground on which all the kids play is directly controlled by the government of the state in which they are playing. There is plenty of data to look at and wonder why the heck they perpetually have their back to the wall. Ultimately, they seem to kind of suck at this. The flood insurance scam is federal.
The Frankish Reich Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago How about applying conservative, market-based principles here? We are subsidizing people to live in places like Malibu by artificially limiting their insurance premiums. Let the market work, let Malibu depopulate. 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 3 hours ago, aristocrat said: Dei is amazing
Andy1 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 56 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: How about applying conservative, market-based principles here? We are subsidizing people to live in places like Malibu by artificially limiting their insurance premiums. Let the market work, let Malibu depopulate. The cost to live in high risk areas must go up given the much greater risk of catastrophic events caused by the changing climate. Communities are going have to spend a lot on infrastructure and fire/fuel management to mitigate risk. Insurance companies will need to raise premiums to appropriate levels. Alternatively, states can insure their citizens living in high risk areas. Eventually, maybe people will migrate back to low risk, boring states with gray skies, rain and snow but cheaper cost of living.
Orlando Buffalo Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago 8 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: How about applying conservative, market-based principles here? We are subsidizing people to live in places like Malibu by artificially limiting their insurance premiums. Let the market work, let Malibu depopulate. The cost/benefit you speak of doesn't happen because of both ends of the spectrum. Low income people are much more likely to call in a small claim that costs more than their premiums and given the choice insurance companies would not cover low income housing, but the government tells them they must cover so many in each set in order to have access to the profitable people. Truly not sure how to fix it but it is the middle who pays the brunt of these policies 1
4th&long Posted 5 minutes ago Posted 5 minutes ago 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: You lose on no water. You Lose on the fire dept didn't do anything. It's a miracle that only 10 people died so far. 10 that didn't listen to the warnings? I'm not into dei and Trans/gay bull ***** but this has no place in this tragedy! Troll farm! Fake news just like the fake president you trolls elected.
Recommended Posts