row_33 Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 9 minutes ago, LeviF91 said: Recent Republican presidents not named George W. Bush and Donald Trump have an awful track record when it comes to that. Based on his Gorsuch pick I don't think Trump would make the same mistakes Reagan and H. W. did. gotta hold Trump to the fire on appointments. doing a great job at lower and equally important levels to date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 4, 2018 Author Share Posted June 4, 2018 1 minute ago, row_33 said: gotta hold Trump to the fire on appointments. doing a great job at lower and equally important levels to date Look at his appointments to the bench at the lower levels. That should bring you comfort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: gotta hold Trump to the fire on appointments. doing a great job at lower and equally important levels to date It's a (really, another) campaign promise that Trump seems fully intent on keeping. The lower courts are being stuffed to the gills with right-wing judges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Look at his appointments to the bench at the lower levels. That should bring you comfort. yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 Ginsburg and Sotomayor dissent. What a...surprise... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 8 minutes ago, LeviF91 said: It's a (really, another) campaign promise that Trump seems fully intent on keeping. The lower courts are being stuffed to the gills with right-wing judges. they don't have to be right wing, but holding to any decent level of common sense would be fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 1 minute ago, row_33 said: they don't have to be right wing, but holding to any decent level of common sense would be fine Certainly. My point was more focused on the campaign promise itself, not necessarily an endorsement of stuffing courts full of right-wingers. There are currently two nominations for the 9th circuit before the Senate Judiciary Committee and one already reported out. May see some common sense out west before too long. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, row_33 said: you really cannot force a private business to perform a task they don't want to, especially if the client is free and unhampered from going to dozens of other suitable options immediately. What about the other protected classes? i mean, what if someone objects to a black santa, or someting along those lines? Edited June 4, 2018 by Paulus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 25 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Ginsburg and Sotomayor dissent. What a...surprise... Ginsburg should have been impeached from the bench long ago when she admitted to using international/foreign law in her rulings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 8 minutes ago, Paulus said: What about the other protected classes? go ahead, elaborate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 Of course multiple media reports today are STILL going with the FALSE spin that the Baker did notwant to bake for Gays. Gays were served at the bakery daily...........it simply doesn't come up. When they refused to participate in a specific service that they did not agree with...............that's when the lawsuits started ....To make an example of the Bigot Baker. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 Just now, row_33 said: go ahead, elaborate... I mean, what if someone objects to a black santa, or someting along those lines? There is definiatly a difference between denying services for someone outright, and denying completing a task a cerain way for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 Surprise ! CNN poo-pooed this as a non precedent ruling. Surely all the other LW lemming media outlets will follow suit. Had the SC went the other way, LW media be trumpeting this as a landmark ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Paulus said: I mean, what if someone objects to a black santa, or someting along those lines? There is definiatly a difference between denying services for someone outright, and denying completing a task a cerain way for them. yes, this should have been completed at the level of the baker stating they unable to complete the task, please go to another bakery taking this to the SC is nothing but lethal vengeance the Dutch still troop out Black Peter for their "Santa Claus" thing each year.... i always send the annual news item along with "WTH is this" to my friends, they never reply... 15 minutes ago, Ifartalot said: Surprise ! CNN poo-pooed this as a non precedent ruling. Surely all the other LW lemming media outlets will follow suit. Had the SC went the other way, LW media be trumpeting this as a landmark ruling. they lose again Edited June 4, 2018 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 23 minutes ago, Cinga said: Ginsburg should have been impeached from the bench long ago when she admitted to using international/foreign law in her rulings She should have retired long ago. Same can be said for many others in Washington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Of course multiple media reports today are STILL going with the FALSE spin that the Baker did notwant to bake for Gays. Gays were served at the bakery daily...........it simply doesn't come up. When they refused to participate in a specific service that they did not agree with...............that's when the lawsuits started ....To make an example of the Bigot Baker. Ya, it upset him it was a gay cake. No bigotry there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Of course multiple media reports today are STILL going with the FALSE spin that the Baker did notwant to bake for Gays. Gays were served at the bakery daily...........it simply doesn't come up. When they refused to participate in a specific service that they did not agree with...............that's when the lawsuits started ....To make an example of the Bigot Baker. Put some candles on it and call it a flaming birthday cake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 Well, that'll throw a wrench into the whole pride month thing. I bet facebook is burning down at the moment. OFF TO TROLL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 when do they pick on a Muslim bakery to this extent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 8 minutes ago, row_33 said: when do they pick on a Muslim bakery to this extent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts