Pete Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 1 hour ago, Limeaid said: Hulking? He is tall but 240 is NOT a lot that big. At his height you expect him to be at least 230. Almost all of his tackles are taller than him. LaConjecture is conjecturing again not reporting. Cam is 6'5 245. Josh is 6'5 240
KD in CA Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 1 hour ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said: The Bills "betting big" on two first rounders that they traded up for??? No way! I had no idea! Thank goodness for quality journalism that keeps us informed!
John from Riverside Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 1 hour ago, Limeaid said: Hulking? He is tall but 240 is NOT a lot that big. At his height you expect him to be at least 230. Almost all of his tackles are taller than him. LaConjecture is conjecturing again not reporting. Im thinking the move from TT's 6' to Allens 6'5" is a noticable thing
Drunken Pygmy Goat Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Yet another guy that views completion percentage as a direct reflection of accuracy. I have a hard time giving these guys credit when they do this, as well as bringing up completion percentages of college QBs from 20-40 years ago. I don't care that he was a scout. And he writes for a website with poor editing. Edited June 1, 2018 by Drunken Pygmy Goat 1
26CornerBlitz Posted June 1, 2018 Author Posted June 1, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said: Yet another guy that equates completion percentage as a direct reflection of accuracy. I have a hard time giving these guys credit when they do this, as well as bringing up completion percentages of college QBs from 20-40 years ago. I don't care that he was a scout. And he writes for a website with poor editing. He's attributing the inaccuracy issue to bad footwork which leads to lower completion %. Totally valid point. I'll be eagerly waiting for DPG pieces with all relevant content and zero errors since you seem to be such a critic. Edited June 1, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz
BillsBytheBay Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 1 hour ago, Lurker said: Like all first round pics pan out? Sammy Watkins says hello... We bet big on Sammy too.
Drunken Pygmy Goat Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 23 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: He's attributing the inaccuracy issue to bad footwork which leads to lower completion %. Totally valid point. I'll be eagerly waiting for DPG pieces with all relevant content and zero errors since you seem to be such a critic. Sorry, just seems like another lazy, regurgitated piece to me, Greg. Why bring up Vick, Kelly, and Favre? Simply because they had poor completion percentages in college, just like Allen? Did they, too, have footwork issues that led to those numbers? I'm sure they did at times, just like pretty much every QB ever, but there's no mention of that in the article, in relation to their completion percentages. Could be that the talent around them played a role, among other things, not to mention that the game was different back then. Comparing QBs from different eras is foolish, especially when comparing numbers. I get the point he (you?) was trying to make, but I feel like I've read this article before, several times, from several different journalists. Got a click from me, though... And he didn't provide any examples, or what may have led to bad footwork on a given play. And he also didn't attribute all bad throws to bad footwork. Not saying that he should have, but what were the issues on those plays, if not footwork? Do those issues support his article in any way, or were they conveniently left out??? I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers. I'm just tired of reading the same things, I guess. 1
26CornerBlitz Posted June 1, 2018 Author Posted June 1, 2018 2 minutes ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said: Sorry, just seems like another lazy, regurgitated piece to me, Greg. Why bring up Vick, Kelly, and Favre? Simply because they had poor completion percentages in college, just like Allen? Did they, too, have footwork issues that led to those numbers? I'm sure they did at times, just like pretty much every QB ever, but there's no mention of that in the article, in relation to their completion percentages. Could be that the talent around them played a role, among other things, not to mention that the game was different back then. Comparing QBs from different eras is foolish, especially when comparing numbers. I get the point he (you?) was trying to make, but I feel like I've read this article before, several times, from several different journalists. Got a click from me, though... And he didn't provide any examples, or what may have led to bad footwork on a given play. And he also didn't attribute all bad throws to bad footwork. Not saying that he should have, but what were the issues on those plays, if not footwork? Do those issues support his article in any way, or were they conveniently left out??? I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers. I'm just tired of reading the same things, I guess. No feather ruffling here. At this juncture, you aren't going to get much ground breaking analysis from analysts who critique Allen so I'm not sure what you expect.
Drunken Pygmy Goat Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 (edited) 3 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said: No feather ruffling here. At this juncture, you aren't going to get much ground breaking analysis from analysts who critique Allen so I'm not sure what you expect. Yeah, it's that time of year. Chalk it up to me yelling at clouds. Btw, I appreciate what you do here. If there's anything posted on the internet, you (and Yolo) are quick to post them here. Edited June 1, 2018 by Drunken Pygmy Goat 1 1
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said: No feather ruffling here. At this juncture, you aren't going to get much ground breaking analysis from analysts who critique Allen so I'm not sure what you expect. So why do you bother posting this drivel??? 1
FappyTheClown Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 4 hours ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said: The Bills "betting big" on two first rounders that they traded up for??? No way!
The Wiz Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 4 hours ago, nucci said: well, they are our top 2 picks...so it makes sense we're betting big on them I'm actually betting big on our UDFA's. Now there's a story to tell.
Gugny Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 Cliff's Notes version: Buffalo Bills are Betting Big on Physically Gifted Rookies Josh Allen and Tremaine Edmunds ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. -- Football players are really big. First round draft picks are important and the people who pick them expect them to do well. 5-31: Jason La Canfora, CBS Sports, on One Bills Live (14:52) 2
DFT Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 (edited) Don’t let any of this distract you from the fact that Ms. Lippy’s car... IS GREEN.... Edited June 1, 2018 by DFT
nedboy7 Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 Wow bashing a journalist again. You guys are so original. Maybe you can spend some time bashing a random bill now.
Gugny Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 4 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Wow bashing a journalist again. You guys are so original. Maybe you can spend some time bashing a random bill now. No one is bashing him. We're just bashing the fluff garbage that he wrote. 1
BuffaloBillyG Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 6 hours ago, ShadyBillsFan said: So, that makes this “revelation” breaking news? My 5 year old grandson could have made the same assessment. But he didn't. Proving once again: LaConjecture>Your 5 Year Old Grandson At least in reporting NFL Conjecture. 1
HOUSE Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 They forgot our 3rd rounder Hoss Cartwright, can wrestle cattle to the ground 2
buffaloboyinATL Posted June 1, 2018 Posted June 1, 2018 55 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Wow bashing a journalist again. You guys are so original. Maybe you can spend some time bashing a random bill now. Good idea. Is Tolbert still around?
Recommended Posts