"Great" Britain is Over

[/dev/null]

13 hours ago, #34fan said:

False... There are literally CHIMPS with better reading comprehension.

 

You should be fired from ABC for that statement and forced to submit a series of contrition Tweets

[#34fan]

22 hours ago, DC Tom said:

Please...tell me, when I wrote that "YOU'RE THE ONE THAT SAID PUNCH WAS THE FIRST RECORDED SLAVE," which part of "The first LEGAL record slave" did I not understand?  

I understand you probably have to run the question by Bonzo and Cheeta.  I'll wait.

 

Are you really such a moron that you can't see the difference? I even made it big and underlined it for you, dumass.

 

It makes all the difference in the world because the lifetime slavery imposed on Punch was the result of criminal, legal proceedings in 1640.

 

Johnson wasn't awarded  Casor in civil court until 1655.

 

In 1641 The first laws giving legality to slavery were written in the Massachusetts Body of Liberties. -Loosely coinciding with the arrival of the Boston's first

 

slave Ship, Desire in 1638. -And even without those facts there's still the documented account of the Jamestown colony. African prisoners, sold as customary

 

slaves upon arrival in 1619. ALL of which make TYTT's original statement:

On ‎5‎/‎31‎/‎2018 at 3:49 PM, TakeYouToTasker said:

 Hell, the first slave owner in what is now considered America was black.  

 

ABSOLUTE BULLSH_T.

 

20 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

You haven't even made a coherent point, and yet you think you're actually having an argument, and somehow winning it.  

 

Covering  your ears and screaming over anyone who sees through your alt-right, Nazi-sympathizing, slavery-justifying, horsesh_t, isn't arguing.

 

You hurl names like a special-needs five year old, because you can't argue.

 

I win every time I get PPP's Highbrow tough-guy,-intellectual, to throw poo like a common chimp when he has nothing left.

9 hours ago, /dev/null said:

You should be fired from ABC for that statement and forced to submit a series of contrition Tweets

 

Do you really think I would go out apologizing like poor Roseanne did?

 

She should have vigorously defended her duty as a comedian to tell jokes... In that line of work, the occasional off-color one is inevitable.

 

people shouldn't automatically lose their jobs over that sh_t.   

Edited June 2, 2018 by #34fan

[DC Tom]

52 minutes ago, #34fan said:

Covering  your ears and screaming over anyone who sees through your alt-right, Nazi-sympathizing, slavery-justifying, horsesh_t, isn't arguing.

 

You hurl names like a special-needs five year old, because you can't argue.

 

I win every time I get PPP's Highbrow tough-guy,-intellectual, to throw poo like a common chimp when he has nothing left.

 

The !@#$?  You're hilarious. 

[3rdnlng]

3 hours ago, #34fan said:

 

Are you really such a moron that you can't see the difference? I even made it big and underlined it for you, dumass.

 

It makes all the difference in the world because the lifetime slavery imposed on Punch was the result of criminal, legal proceedings in 1640.

 

Johnson wasn't awarded  Casor in civil court until 1655.

 

In 1641 The first laws giving legality to slavery were written in the Massachusetts Body of Liberties. -Loosely coinciding with the arrival of the Boston's first

 

slave Ship, Desire in 1638. -And even without those facts there's still the documented account of the Jamestown colony. African prisoners, sold as customary

 

slaves upon arrival in 1619. ALL of which make TYTT's original statement:

 

ABSOLUTE BULLSH_T.

 

 

Covering  your ears and screaming over anyone who sees through your alt-right, Nazi-sympathizing, slavery-justifying, horsesh_t, isn't arguing.

 

You hurl names like a special-needs five year old, because you can't argue.

 

I win every time I get PPP's Highbrow tough-guy,-intellectual, to throw poo like a common chimp when he has nothing left.

 

Do you really think I would go out apologizing like poor Roseanne did?

 

She should have vigorously defended her duty as a comedian to tell jokes... In that line of work, the occasional off-color one is inevitable.

 

people shouldn't automatically lose their jobs over that sh_t.   

I don't claim to have a lot of knowledge regarding the start of slavery in America, but I do claim to be pretty good at judging people (except for my last wife). You called me a dumass a couple of days ago and I corrected you on it. It's dumbass you dumbass. I corrected you. You acknowledged that. So now you call DC Tom a dumass. Do you not learn from your mistakes dumbass? So, I stated that I'm a pretty good judge of people. I judge you as a person adverse to learning new things and afraid of self evaluation. Your take on slavery is most likely what you first learned and you haven't changed it since you learned it. Now, since I'm no expert on the specifics I can't say one way or the other if you are right, partly right  or some degree of wrong. I can only project that you are fullofshit because of your proven intransience and prior posts.

[4merper4mer]

8 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

I don't claim to have a lot of knowledge regarding the start of slavery in America, but I do claim to be pretty good at judging people (except for my last wife). You called me a dumass a couple of days ago and I corrected you on it. It's dumbass you dumbass. I corrected you. You acknowledged that. So now you call DC Tom a dumass. Do you not learn from your mistakes dumbass? So, I stated that I'm a pretty good judge of people. I judge you as a person adverse to learning new things and afraid of self evaluation. Your take on slavery is most likely what you first learned and you haven't changed it since you learned it. Now, since I'm no expert on the specifics I can't say one way or the other if you are right, partly right  or some degree of wrong. I can only project that you are fullofshit because of your proven intransience and prior posts.

 

He leaves the b out of dumbass, you add a d to averse.  Can't we all just get along?

[3rdnlng]

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

 

He leaves the b out of dumbass, you add a d to averse.  Can't we all just get along?

Don't be a dumbass, adverse is a word and it fits within the sentiments I was conveying. A verse would also work, but probably only in the 2nd stanza.

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

37 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Don't be a dumbass, adverse is a word and it fits within the sentiments I was conveying. A verse would also work, but probably only in the 2nd stanza.

 

You could always be averse to using the correct spelling of words too. It's possible.

 

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, joesixpack said:

 

You could always be averse to using the correct spelling of words too. It's possible.

 

You're just begging for an adverse reaction.

[/dev/null]

35 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

You could always be averse to using the correct spelling of words too. It's possible.

 

33 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

You're just begging for an adverse reaction.

 

 

[4merper4mer]

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

Don't be a dumbass, adverse is a word and it fits within the sentiments I was conveying. A verse would also work, but probably only in the 2nd stanza.

Adverse fits your post in the same way "dunno" and "sorta" are words.  They aren't really correct but tons of people use them anyway.  Look up the definitions of averse and adverse.  They are different words with different meanings.

[3rdnlng]

33 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Adverse fits your post in the same way "dunno" and "sorta" are words.  They aren't really correct but tons of people use them anyway.  Look up the definitions of averse and adverse.  They are different words with different meanings.

I know they are different and I get to choose my own words. You can call yourself a Hoosier or a Hoser, it's your choice or preference, they're both about the same.

[#34fan]

15 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

I don't claim to have a lot of knowledge regarding the start of slavery in America, but I do claim to be pretty good at judging people (except for my last wife). You called me a dumass a couple of days ago and I corrected you on it. It's dumbass you dumbass. I corrected you. You acknowledged that. So now you call DC Tom a dumass. Do you not learn from your mistakes dumbass?

 

[4merper4mer]

6 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

I know they are different and I get to choose my own words. You can call yourself a Hoosier or a Hoser, it's your choice or preference, they're both about the same.

I don't really care about you using incorrect words.  I only brought it up because you were harping on the same thing.   Averse and adverse have different meaning much like dumbass has a spelling.

[The_Dude]

I love that country. Aside from Roman history, English history is a hobby of mine. Sadly, the country is going to enter a downward spin. Great Britain will be a caliphate by 2050. Good thing they don’t got guns. 

Churchill would weep if he knew who the mayor of London was. 

[3rdnlng]

49 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

I don't really care about you using incorrect words.  I only brought it up because you were harping on the same thing.   Averse and adverse have different meaning much like dumbass has a spelling.

Yes, adverse and averse have slightly different meanings but they both can mean "in opposition" or "against". I could have just as easily told #34head that he was against learning new things as adverse to learning new things. #34head is the same as ****head. He's come on here and acted an ass in every way. When he messed up I called him on it. He acknowledged that he messed up and then continued to do so. I called him on it again and you went all Canadian on me. Is it true that when Canada deports people they all go to Indiana to become Hosers?

[4merper4mer]

34 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Yes, adverse and averse have slightly different meanings but they both can mean "in opposition" or "against". I could have just as easily told #34head that he was against learning new things as adverse to learning new things. #34head is the same as ****head. He's come on here and acted an ass in every way. When he messed up I called him on it. He acknowledged that he messed up and then continued to do so. I called him on it again and you went all Canadian on me. Is it true that when Canada deports people they all go to Indiana to become Hosers?

Your assessment of 34 is accurate but loses credibility when you use words improperly but continue to insist you haven't.

 

 

[3rdnlng]

2 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Your assessment of 34 is accurate but loses credibility when you use words improperly but continue to insist you haven't.

 

 

I simply could have used either word. To quote a member of this board (who happens to be a former Viet Kong mother of 8 or 10 or sometimes 12) dissirregardless of what you say, you are simply trying to draw a distinction where there is little distinction to be had.

[4merper4mer]

53 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I simply could have used either word. To quote a member of this board (who happens to be a former Viet Kong mother of 8 or 10 or sometimes 12) dissirregardless of what you say, you are simply trying to draw a distinction where there is little distinction to be had.

Corn cannot grow on Mars because of the adverse conditions.

 

Bill is averse to planting corn because he is lazy.

 

Bill cannot be adverse to growing corn.

 

There is no such thing as averse conditions.

[#34fan]

48 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

 

There is no such thing as averse conditions.

 

There is, if you're a dumass.

[Brit]

On 5/30/2018 at 2:34 AM, #34fan said:

 

Unless I'm mistaken, the majority of the population of London now identifies as non-white, so.... Less cars is what I was thinking.

You are mistaken. Last time it was checked London was 60% White.  Likely to be a couple of %age points down from that now, but still majority white.