Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Mark80 said:

 

So basically, this is akin to you starting to like the 76ers this year.  A time when it is absolutely clear that they are a young team on the rise with trophies in their future.  Congrats, you are total bandwagoner.  And this thread is absurd.

 

LOL. My main team is Boston. I'm no bandwagoner. I also support Golden State since I live here now. Guess you're jealous I have good teams to root for. I am disappointed in your statement.

 

10 hours ago, Utah John said:

And the Seahawks should have given the ball to Lynch and won their second SB in a row.  So they actually won, I guess, and the Pats didn't win whatever number that was. 

 

The Cavs pulled out the championship on one of their previous four tries.  I don't think they were the better team but they won.  Good for them.  As some coach once said, you are what your record says you are.  Your ACTUAL record, not the couldawouldashoulda record in your head.

 

73-9. Greatest season ever by an NBA team and greatest team of all time.

12 hours ago, JimKellyTryouts said:

It's as if one of these teams has a championship and one doesn't.

 

They needed LeBron every time to make the NBA finals. And what do they have to show for it? 1-4, and them stealing the title in 2016 with the help of referees.

7 hours ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said:

**** you’re right. But that’s skill good for a Cleveland team. Hell most of us cried like school girls just by sneaking into the playoffs 

 

We were extremely dominant in the laste 80's and 90's with Jim Kelly and crew; much better than Cleveland's dominance recently. I'd take Buffalo anyday over the Cavaliers.

Edited by mileena
Posted
44 minutes ago, ThunderGun said:

So you clearly didn't watch much of either Conference Finals series.

 

Terrible product growing more rapidly than any other sport on the entire world.

 

But I will say that Cavs Warriors 4 isn't doing the league any favors. Wasn't happy at all when Paul went down.  

But if you think that's all he NBA is then you simply don't watch it, or you would notice teams like Boston and San Antonio playing the style of ball you talk about.

Watched a lot actually. Last night's game is a perfect example of my point. 3 pointer from both teams whenever the opportunity presented itself.  The game is much better when it's balanced.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Kwai San said:

 

Agree - NBA?!?!?!  SMFH.....

 

Since I have moved to the Bay Area in 2009, our teams have won five world championsips (three by the SF Giants and two by the Warriors) and are about to win two more: Warriors this year and Golden Knights in the NHL (Las Vegas is an adopted hometown for our area due to the fact the Oakland Raiders are moving there soon). I have never enjoyed success like this in my entire life, so you can't blame me for embracing it.

Edited by mileena
Posted
5 minutes ago, mileena said:

 

Since I have moved to the Bay Area in 2009, our teams have won five world championsips (three by the SF Giants and two by the Warriors) and are about to win two more: Warriors this year and Golden Knights in the NHL (Las Vegas is an adopted hometown for our area due to the fact the Oakland Raiders are moving there soon). I have never enjoyed success like this in my entire life, so you can't blame me for embracing it.

But they're not your home teams you grew up with. Doesn't work that way...I've lived just outside of Philly for many years now. I have never celebrated the Eagles or Phillies championships while I have been here

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, nucci said:

But they're not your home teams you grew up with. Doesn't work that way...I've lived just outside of Philly for many years now. I have never celebrated the Eagles or Phillies championships while I have been here

 

I lived in Philly from 2000-2009. I despised the Eagles, Phillies, 76ers, and Flyers. But in SF, it is hard to hate their teams, since the people are so nice. Curry, Thompson, and KD are humble, good athletes and their team was built from the ground up. The SF Giants are working class and underdogs who won the WS each time. OTOH, Philadelphia is a s---hole area and the athletes are arrogant.

 

I lived in Maine from 1992 to 2000 and despised the Patriots, Red Spox, and Bruins. I hated how people there made a trip to Sullivan Stadium regulary to suport the Patriots, especially in their Super Bowl year under Drew Bledsoe.

 

I lived in Rochester in 1989 when I went to the U of R and was furious there was a student who cheered for the SF 49ers in Wilson Commons (the student union) and made fun of the Bills on a regulalr basis. He made fun of us evertyime we lost in 1989, when we were 9-7. We had to also endure many NY Giants fans who went upstate from NCY for school there. They begged us to turn the TV to the NFL Today on CBS (covered the NFC) for the 12:30 PM weekly pre-game show, when we Bills fans watched NFL Live on NBC, which covered the AFC.

 

3 hours ago, White Linen said:

 

You're in ecstasy over a team making the championship that isn't your favorite team?  Weird!

 

Well, if Buffalo had an NBA team, that would be a different story. But they don't, so I am free to choose. However, for NCAA men's basketball, I am a loyal fan of Syracuse.

 

BTW, people from Buffalo are obligated to like the NY Yankees, as if they were called the Buffalo Yankees. The was a poll in the early to mid 80's in the Buffalo News, asking what team should Buffalo adopt for the MLB. TBN said would cover them then as if they were a home team. That team was the Yankees, who recieived an overwhelming number of votes. The only MLB team that received no votes was Atlanta.

 

There was a poster on the old BBMB who was from Buffalo and liked the Bills and Sabres, but also like the Mets. He had this in his signature. I was very angry at him and condemned him for being a traitor to Buffalo.

Edited by mileena
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JPP said:

No but having the longest playoff drought in all of sports would be the reason the Bills are up there....

 

17 years is nothing. The Montreal Expos had the longest post-season playoff drought: 30 years, from 1982 to 2011:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Major_League_Baseball_franchise_postseason_droughts#Longest_postseason_droughts_in_the_expanded-postseason_era

Edited by mileena
Posted
35 minutes ago, Southtown Tommy said:

Watched a lot actually. Last night's game is a perfect example of my point. 3 pointer from both teams whenever the opportunity presented itself.  The game is much better when it's balanced.

Last night, and Game Seven of the eastern finals were both perfect examples of how the NBA product has deteriorated. Both the Rockets and the Celtics went something like 6 for 40 from the three point line...but they just kept clanking them up there!  Clank, clank, clank.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, 707BillsFan said:

Go A's & Warriors, screw everyone else. How do you hate the A's? What did they ever do to deserve a !@#$????  

 

Oakland. Enough said.

1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Cavalier Championships: 1

Bills Championships: 0

This thread: -1

 

Let me correct that for you:

 

Cavaliers Championships: 1

Bills Championships: 2

This thread: +1

 

Therefore: Buffalo Bills > Clevaland Cavaliers.

Edited by mileena
Posted
2 hours ago, JPP said:

umm...take away the past season.....than yes we did have the longest playoff drought which would constitute us as being up there as one of the worst teams in sports.......

 

...why...would we take away the past season?  Hey, by that logic, if we take away the Brady years we can clearly say the Patriots are one of the worst teams in pro sports.  ?

Posted
1 hour ago, mileena said:

 

LOL. My main team is Boston. I'm no bandwagoner. I also support Golden State since I live here now. Guess you're jealous I have good teams to root for. I am disappointed in your statement.

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, JPP said:

umm...take away the past season.....than yes we did have the longest playoff drought which would constitute us as being up there as one of the worst teams in sports.......

If you take away yesterday, the Stanley Cup finals are tied at 0-0!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, 707BillsFan said:

Go A's & Warriors, screw everyone else. How do you hate the A's? What did they ever do to deserve a !@#$????  

 

Fine I’ll spare the As. 

 

But you wouldn’t be a fan of their team if you went into their office. They have like their ALCS trophy next to their water cooler. Place is a mess that doesn’t pay their players. 

 

But 100% !@#$ the warriors and everyone else. 

Posted

All it takes is one championship, one parade...and the city of Cleveland got that.  They are off the list.   I read somewhere that San Diego is high on the sports suffering list, but again it's a two-sport (now one sport) town.  Buffalo has got to be right there at the top.

Posted
12 hours ago, GETTOTHE50 said:

I live in the bay too, and !@#$ all Bay Area teams. 

 

 

What bay?

Posted (edited)

So you think the Bills are the "worst team in sports" because they made it to 4 consecutive super bowls and lost.

 

Now I have heard it all. 

Edited by Bob in STL
Posted
23 minutes ago, Irv said:

 

What bay?

 

There is only one true Bay Area, although San Diego and Tampa claim it too, especially "South Bay".

Posted
16 hours ago, mileena said:

Being from the Bay Area, I am in ecstacy that the Golden State Warriors just reached their fourth consecutive NBA league championship, as did the Cleveland Cavaliers yesterday. This got me thinking: who was the last team to reach four straight finals in the four major sports? Oh, that's right: the Buffalo Bills. Which led me to think of their four straight Super Bowl losses and how everyone makes fun of that.

 

Well, in about two to three weeks, the Cleveland Cavaliers willl lose yet again to the Warriors in the NBA Finals. They also lost last year in 2017, and in 2015. They should have lost in 2016 too when they were down 3-1. So, basically, the Cavs should be 0-4 in the last four finals, and 0-5 overall. So, 0-5 is worse than 0-4 for the Bills (who really should be 1-3 since they should have beaten the Giants in SB XXV), so the Cleveland Cavaliers will be the new worst team in the four major sports.

 

LOL. Cleveland sucks; Buffalo rocks.

 

I'm a "cup half full" mind of guy myself, but this is just wrong.

 

 The "should have" and "should be" parts of your post aren't a true reflection of reality. If they were, the history books would reflect that. The Cavs would have lost the series in 2016, and the Bills would have been world champs following the 1990 season, but that's not what happened...The Cavs may have defied the odds, and the Warriors may have let one slip, but if they "should have" lost the series, they "would have". 

 

BTW, the Bills aren't the worst team in sports, and haven't been for almost 35 years, if you consider the 1984 Bills worse than every other professional sports team that year. The early 90s Bills may have been a bit of a punchline at the time, and for a little while after, but everyone that's not "hating" and is rational outside of Bills fans will tell you that those Bills were some of the best to ever play the game, and that the 1990 Bills was arguably the best team  ever to not win a title.

 

When I read the thread title, I thought this was going to be about the Sabres. In a few weeks, they won't be arguably (hardly arguable) the worst team in professional sports when they draft Dahlin. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Jay_Fixit said:

Sure they will.

 

Marv Levy.

 

I see this thrown around a lot.

 

Sure, he was out-coached that day. Parcells and Belichick are arguably the 2 best coaches of all time. But the fact of the matter is that the Bills were a made FG away from winning a title (barring an Ebor City Miracle on the ensuing kickoff). 

 

There was plenty of blame to go around for that game. Levy, Norwood, Reed being "taken out" of the game, several missed tackles on 3rd and long, etc. all played a role. If the players had made the play on 3 or 4 plays during that game, especially on the Giants final offensive drive (and obviously the FG), the Bills probably put the Giants away, and no one would be pointing any fingers.

4 hours ago, JPP said:

umm...take away the past season.....than yes we did have the longest playoff drought which would constitute us as being up there as one of the worst teams in sports.......

 

Perfect thread for this post

Posted
9 minutes ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said:

 

I see this thrown around a lot.

 

Sure, he was out-coached that day. Parcells and Belichick are arguably the 2 best coaches of all time. But the fact of the matter is that the Bills were a made FG away from winning a title (barring an Ebor City Miracle on the ensuing kickoff). 

 

There was plenty of blame to go around for that game. Levy, Norwood, Reed being "taken out" of the game, several missed tackles on 3rd and long, etc. all played a role. If the players had made the play on 3 or 4 plays during that game, especially on the Giants final offensive drive (and obviously the FG), the Bills probably put the Giants away, and no one would be pointing any fingers.

 

Perfect thread for this post

Im only here for entertainment purposes

2 hours ago, The Red King said:

 

...why...would we take away the past season?  Hey, by that logic, if we take away the Brady years we can clearly say the Patriots are one of the worst teams in pro sports.  ?

Here for only entertainment purposes

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, mileena said:

 

LOL. My main team is Boston. I'm no bandwagoner. I also support Golden State since I live here now. Guess you're jealous I have good teams to root for. I am disappointed in your statement.

 

Dude, by saying you have a "main team", that is different than the team that you're "ecstatic" about, pretty much means you're a GS bandwagoner. Nothing wrong with that, but you can't deny it.

 

Quote

73-9. Greatest season ever by an NBA team and greatest team of all time.

 

"Greatness" in sports is generally defined by championships. They didn't win the championship that year, so to say that they were the greatest team of all time IMO is wrong. Maybe the best team of all time, but that's not the same as "greatest". The 2007 *Pats were arguably the best team of all time, but they weren't the greatest, because they lost the title game. Same kind of thing applies to the *Pats win over the Falcons. It is referred to as the greatest comeback, because a title was involved. But the Bills own the biggest comeback.

 

3 hours ago, mileena said:

 

Since I have moved to the Bay Area in 2009, our teams have won five world championsips (three by the SF Giants and two by the Warriors) and are about to win two more: Warriors this year and Golden Knights in the NHL (Las Vegas is an adopted hometown for our area due to the fact the Oakland Raiders are moving there soon). I have never enjoyed success like this in my entire life, so you can't blame me for embracing it.

 

Holy crap!

 

How was being a Sharks fan for 3 years???

Edited by Drunken Pygmy Goat
×
×
  • Create New...