Jump to content

Keep Talking About Impeaching Trump, Dems


Recommended Posts

Interesting poll - Damned if you do.  Damned if you don't.

 

Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for a candidate for Congress in your district who said he or she would vote to impeach Donald Trump?

 

32%- yes.  35% - no.  15% - doesn't matter.  Do you appeal to your base to energize them while also energizing the other side or try to appeal to the Independents?

 

                                                                                                                Overall           Dem      Ind      Rep

A lot more likely to vote for the candidate -                                         20%             42%      12%     5%

Somewhat more likely to vote for the candidate  -                             12%             19%      10%     4%

Neither more likely nor less likely, it doesn’t make a difference -     15%             15%      18%     10%   

Somewhat less likely to vote for the candidate -                                  5%              4%         5%       7%

A lot less likely to vote for the candidate -                                           30%             7%         28%     66%

Not sure -                                                                                                   18%             12%       28%      8%

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Interesting poll - Damned if you do.  Damned if you don't.

 

Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for a candidate for Congress in your district who said he or she would vote to impeach Donald Trump?

 

32%- yes.  35% - no.  15% - doesn't matter.  Do you appeal to your base to energize them while also energizing the other side or try to appeal to the Independents?

 

                                                                                                                Overall           Dem      Ind      Rep

A lot more likely to vote for the candidate -                                         20%             42%      12%     5%

Somewhat more likely to vote for the candidate  -                             12%             19%      10%     4%

Neither more likely nor less likely, it doesn’t make a difference -     15%             15%      18%     10%   

Somewhat less likely to vote for the candidate -                                  5%              4%         5%       7%

A lot less likely to vote for the candidate -                                           30%             7%         28%     66%

Not sure -                                                                                                   18%             12%       28%      8%

 

 

 

What manner of convoluted question is that?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The argument against illegal immigrants is they broke the law. Obstructing justice is breaking the law. So...

 

Try to keep up.

 

First it was Trump colluded, then obstruction, then a brief interlude about banging stormy, then Trump was spied on and now we're at the IC was protecting Trump and the American people from the Russians.  Obstruction of justice is so 2017. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Try to keep up.

 

First it was Trump colluded, then obstruction, then a brief interlude about banging stormy, then Trump was spied on and now we're at the IC was protecting Trump and the American people from the Russians.  Obstruction of justice is so 2017. 

Too bad he didn't send emails like Hillary. 

 

But seriously, Trump broke the law by interfering in an investigation. Who knows what he was trying to cover up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Too bad he didn't send emails like Hillary. 

 

But seriously, Trump broke the law by interfering in an investigation. Who knows what he was trying to cover up. 

 

Explain, in great detail, how he interfered in any investigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Koko78 said:

 

Explain, in great detail, how he interfered in any investigation.

Fired the chief investigator of said investigation and then admitted the reason for firing him was the said investigation. Said it on national television, too. Probably the reason the idiot won't do interviews outside of his little safe space on Fox news. 

 

 

image.jpeg.525f312b0e64a014bd05797d6b1cdd2f.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Fired the chief investigator of said investigation and then admitted the reason for firing him was the said investigation. Said it on national television, too. Probably the reason the idiot won't do interviews outside of his little safe space on Fox news. 

 

 

image.jpeg.525f312b0e64a014bd05797d6b1cdd2f.jpeg

 

Which investigation was this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you are ignorant? 

 

You don't know anything? 

 

Well you certainly can't be talking about the investigation that has widely been shown to be based on lies, deception, and corruption by the Department of Justice in general, and the FBI in particular, so I have to ask which investigation you're referring to.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well you certainly can't be talking about the investigation that has widely been shown to be based on lies, deception, and corruption by the Department of Justice in general, and the FBI in particular, so I have to ask which investigation you're referring to.

In other words you are just a Trumpbot and the truth does not matter. Will you be joining Tasker in shooting people when/if Trump is indicted? 

 

Because, if the DOJ is as corrupt as you say, Trump is toast. He's going down. The Deep State will burn him. Right? 

5 minutes ago, TtownBillsFan said:

Thanks for trying, DC, but you know the point is going to go over Tib's head.

Not even, I didn't look at that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

In other words you are just a Trumpbot and the truth does not matter. Will you be joining Tasker in shooting people when/if Trump is indicted? 

 

Because, if the DOJ is as corrupt as you say, Trump is toast. He's going down. The Deep State will burn him. Right?

 

Indicted with what? By whom?

 

I know this is the latest liberal histrionic fantasy (after the Electoral College revolt, the impeachment nonsense, and Stormy), but it's not going to happen. However, please keep the flame alive, as it will guarantee Trump in 2020. You're just doing your part to Keep America Great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Koko78 said:

 

Indicted with what? By whom?

 

I know this is the latest liberal histrionic fantasy (after the Electoral College revolt, the impeachment nonsense, and Stormy), but it's not going to happen. However, please keep the flame alive, as it will guarantee Trump in 2020. You're just doing your part to Keep America Great!

Hello idiot! The corrupt DOJ will indict him. Who cares what he did, the Deep State will get him. I'm using your own f'n argument! 

 

Or do you just want it both ways? The investigation is bad and corrupt, but they can't hurt him because they need real evidence? 

 

2020?? You think the Deep State will allow him to run again in 2020? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TtownBillsFan said:

Thanks for trying, DC, but you know the point is going to go over Tib's head.

No need to point that out. Everything goes over gator's head. He has to look up to see the blades of grass in his lawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

No need to point that out. Everything goes over gator's head. He has to look up to see the blades of grass in his lawn.

 

who hasn't been there a few mornings

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...