Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Yolo - I don't know if it's true but I heard/read that it was down to either Mayfield or Allen for the Browns at #1. 

 

Mayfield seems to feel that it was down to he or Allen for the Browns, too. 

Edited by BillsFan4
Posted
Just now, BillsFan4 said:

Yolo - I don't know if it's true but I heard/read that it was down to either Mayfield or Allen for the Browns at #1. 

 

Mayfield seems to feel that it was down to he or Allen for the Browns, too. 

That was reported the week of the draft but I didn’t  know how accurate the Allen part was 

Posted
Just now, YoloinOhio said:

That was reported the week of the draft but I didn’t  know how accurate the Allen part was 

I've read it reported a few places now.

 

They were talking about it on NFL network after the draft, too. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, White Linen said:

I'm glad the Browns chose wrong.

 

Time will tell......

 

I would have taken Darnold, but that’s just me. 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:

per"mutation" 

Only a matter of time before someone tries to mutate QB's.

 

.....wait wasn't Drago a mutation ?

 

 

tenor.gif?itemid=7250428

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Klaista2k said:

Perhaps Allen would've gone 1st if the Bills didn't leak his twitter comments :lol:

 

The process has many twists and turns.....

Posted
1 minute ago, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

but, but baker. what about the other guy?

 

Nine “mistakes” made ahead of me, and they will rue the day.

 

 

If Rosen was as smart as he claims to be, he would realize 29 teams didn't want him.  Once he fell to 10, every other team was in play in terms of trade with the exception of the Rams and KC.  A first and next years first, or the Pats could have thrown #23 and #31.  It was the Cardinals that begrudgingly made the move to get the ugly girl at the bar, and paid ZERO premium in the trade they made with Oakland.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...