SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 What’s Twitter? Also. Did I see someone blame Rodak for the screen graphic ? Or did Rodak and the scroll both say Rosen in Buffalo?
co_springs_billsfan Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 I had my neighbor Patriots* "fan" ask me today if the Bills made any good trades.
JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 good editing in journalism is dead. they just want to get something up on the feed. they don't care if its accurate. Not just ESPN, its WaPo, NYT, almost any online news source ... constantly using incorrect grammar, misspelling words, not matching graphics to text, etc. garbage. and no, I didn't bother editing the above, why should I? the "pros" don't. 3
Hapless Bills Fan Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 57 minutes ago, Gugny said: ESPN has expressed concern about Josh Allen's passing accuracy. Buffalo Bills expressed concern about ESPN's "Josh" accuracy. Understand the ESPN accuracy bit. Did ESPN post a pic of Josh Rosen instead of Josh Allen under a Bills tagline or something? 1 hour ago, Foxx said: you seriously don't get the context? getting ESPN or not should have nothing to do with understanding here. can i merge your response with your original post????? You're just a helpful little chap, aren't you.
njbuff Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 2 hours ago, SouthNYfan said: Damn, he looks good in shorts. If he is the answer at QB, who cares if he has frigging Leprechaun legs.
Foxx Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: ... You're just a helpful little chap, aren't you. i try... look at the red underlined words......
Hapless Bills Fan Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 29 minutes ago, Foxx said: i try... look at the red underlined words...... The jpg you attempted to embed shows to me as: DdAlyMYUwAAuXFg.jpg Ditto the link in 26CB's OP. Since there aren't any pictures or words, there aren't any red underlined words. I can see I need to check out this board using a different operating system to see if an actual picture with self explanatory humor would come through. Edit: done. See it now. One does wonder why a helpful sentence like "ESPN showed a pic of Josh Allen over a Bills logo, with banner text proclaiming 'Josh Rosen practices at Bills Minicamp" would have been beyond the abilities of you gents to craft.
benderbender Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: The jpg you attempted to embed shows to me as: DdAlyMYUwAAuXFg.jpg Ditto the link in 26CB's OP. Since there aren't any pictures or words, there aren't any red underlined words. I can see I need to check out this board using a different operating system to see if an actual picture with self explanatory humor would come through. Edit: done. See it now. One does wonder why a helpful sentence like "ESPN showed a pic of Josh Allen over a Bills logo, with banner text proclaiming 'Josh Rosen practices at Bills Minicamp" would have been beyond the abilities of you gents to craft. I agree. Shame on you quick witted whippersnappers with your pictures that provide context! And turn down that music! 1
Foxx Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 (edited) 30 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: ... One does wonder why a helpful sentence like "ESPN showed a pic of Josh Allen over a Bills logo, with banner text proclaiming 'Josh Rosen practices at Bills Minicamp" would have been beyond the abilities of you gents to craft. this is, afterall, the internet. big girl panties are required... would you like me to have a word with Al Gore?? Edited May 13, 2018 by Foxx text was tiny and difficult to read 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 23 minutes ago, Foxx said: this is, afterall, the internet. big girl panties are required... would you like me to have a word with Al Gore?? Think I rest my case here. 27 minutes ago, benderbender said: I agree. Shame on you quick witted whippersnappers with your pictures that provide context! And turn down that music! And here too. I mean, no one likes a suck-up, but when there's obviously some kind of an information gap, you can be helpful or you can whip out your snark and wave it around wildly, filled with the sublime confidence that we all want to see just what you've got.
Foxx Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Think I rest my case here. And here too excuse me..... wtf did you edit my post?? i am able to post small text as that feature is enabled. you are overstepping your authority. wow! ETA: i changed it back, leave my **** alone. Edited May 13, 2018 by Foxx 1
MJS Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 28 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: The jpg you attempted to embed shows to me as: DdAlyMYUwAAuXFg.jpg Ditto the link in 26CB's OP. Since there aren't any pictures or words, there aren't any red underlined words. I can see I need to check out this board using a different operating system to see if an actual picture with self explanatory humor would come through. Edit: done. See it now. One does wonder why a helpful sentence like "ESPN showed a pic of Josh Allen over a Bills logo, with banner text proclaiming 'Josh Rosen practices at Bills Minicamp" would have been beyond the abilities of you gents to craft. Well, you also didn't explain that you couldn't see the photo until later. This is what we call a misunderstanding.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 3 minutes ago, MJS said: Well, you also didn't explain that you couldn't see the photo until later. This is what we call a misunderstanding. Correct. 3 minutes ago, Foxx said: excuse me..... wtf did you edit my post?? i am able to post small text as that feature is enabled. you are overstepping your authority. wow! I don't think so. If you have something to say, say it in regular size text we can all read, don't hide it with small size and grey-out. But you're welcome to go off and complain about it if you choose. 1
Foxx Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Correct. I don't think so. If you have something to say, say it in regular size text we can all read, don't hide it with small size and grey-out. But you're welcome to go off and complain about it if you choose. look overlord, you need only ask yourself one question... why is size and color enabled for me to customize in my editor. you are overreaching your authority, by leaps and bounds. 8 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Correct. I don't think so. If you have something to say, say it in regular size text we can all read, don't hide it with small size and grey-out. But you're welcome to go off and complain about it if you choose. additionally, it is not hiding anything. it is my style and i have been doing that since day one here and i do it on many forms, it is just my style. if you want to see what it says, you just need to work for it. again, leave my **** alone if it does not violate the terms of service. Edited May 13, 2018 by Foxx 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: look overlord, you need only ask yourself one question... why is size and color enabled for me to customize in my editor. you are overreaching your authority, by leaps and bounds. Why do folks feel that everything that would make a Message group unpleasant or unreadable has to be spelled out in a rule somewhere or physically precluded? In case other people have bright ideas to emulate you, I'll put it here: don't change part of your post, especially the snarky parts, to small fonts that people have trouble reading, especially on mobile devices with small screens. It's not good practice. It doesn't make the newsgroup a more pleasant or readable place. Good practice is not limited by the outer bounds of what the newsgroup software will allow. You've been messaged and asked politely not to do that, don't do that again. If you have a private beef with me, PM is the place for that. If that's not enough for you, go take it up with SDS. 1
Foxx Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Why do folks feel that everything that would make a Message group unpleasant or unreadable has to be spelled out in a rule somewhere or physically precluded? In case other people have bright ideas to emulate you, I'll put it here: don't change part of your post, especially the snarky parts, to small fonts that people have trouble reading, especially on mobile devices with small screens. It's not good practice. It doesn't make the newsgroup a more pleasant or readable place. Good practice is not limited by the outer bounds of what the newsgroup software will allow. You've been messaged and asked politely not to do that, don't do that again. If you have a private beef with me, PM is the place for that. If that's not enough for you, go take it up with SDS. i think you are the one with the beef. you don't like that i challenged you when you went on your merge parade.
DriveFor1Outta5 Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said: So much humor has been lost recently. As evidenced by what this topic has turned into.? Edited May 13, 2018 by DriveFor1Outta5 2
Hapless Bills Fan Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: i think you are the one with the beef. you don't like that i challenged you when you went on your merge parade. Dude, in all honesty, I have no idea who objected to that. I was not keeping track. A couple people who went postal about it (went on and on and on and on) were banned, but by SDS not by me, and not for that reason as I understand it- certainly not for just objecting! Seriously, if I carried all that stuff around with me and kept track of who objected or what all, I 1) would indeed be the wrong person for the job 2) prolly wouldn't be able to walk by now, with that heavy a load Peace out
Foxx Posted May 13, 2018 Posted May 13, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Dude, in all honesty, I have no idea who objected to that. I was not keeping track. A couple people who went postal about it (went on and on and on and on) were banned, but by SDS not by me, and not for that reason as I understand it- certainly not for just objecting! Seriously, if I carried all that stuff around with me and kept track of who objected or what all, I 1) would indeed be the wrong person for the job 2) prolly wouldn't be able to walk by now, with that heavy a load Peace out as you said, you have pm'd me. why do you insist on continuing here and disrupting the thread? i have been responding to those pm's. you are taking this whole episode wrong. the small text was meant for comedic relief. nothing nefarious was intended and as i stated, i have been doing this since day 1 here. why now all of a sudden is it an issue with you? Edited May 13, 2018 by Foxx
Recommended Posts