Doc Posted May 7, 2018 Posted May 7, 2018 3 hours ago, billsbackto81 said: Correct. I should have stated he was given the lowest tender and not one that would require compensation from an interested team (ala Chris Hogan). MG was given the lowest tender, but that meant that losing him got the Bills a pick in the round in which he was drafted, which was the 5th round, which they used on Milano. Chris Hogan was undrafted so he got them nothing. 2 hours ago, buffalobloodfloridahome said: He was considered a liability in New England because he wasn't a great pass blocker or pass catching RB and it made their offense predictable when he was in it was almost always a run. When they noticed he was not versatile enough he lost playing time and became dispensable. Honestly don't need him back on our roster with Ivory already here, we have that goal line smasher which was Gilly's forte. Which again is all on the Cheaters for not knowing that beforehand. And if they did know, then it appears it was just a move to take him away from the Bills. If so, ha ha.
Like A Mofo Posted May 7, 2018 Posted May 7, 2018 On 5/6/2018 at 6:38 AM, CNY315 said: We used that 5th for Milano right? Mike Rodak must be inconsolable over this. All the button pushing he put on Bills fans for this. My condolences Rodak.
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 7, 2018 Posted May 7, 2018 19 minutes ago, Doc said: MG was given the lowest tender, but that meant that losing him got the Bills a pick in the round in which he was drafted, which was the 5th round, which they used on Milano. Chris Hogan was undrafted so he got them nothing. Which again is all on the Cheaters for not knowing that beforehand. And if they did know, then it appears it was just a move to take him away from the Bills. If so, ha ha. Do you honestly think the Pats really view us as a threat? The Pats saw a player who performed well against them, like Hogan and Gilmore, and thought they would fit well on their team.
Doc Posted May 7, 2018 Posted May 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Do you honestly think the Pats really view us as a threat? The Pats saw a player who performed well against them, like Hogan and Gilmore, and thought they would fit well on their team. And they totally ignored his inability to pass block, catch the ball, and play STs'?
Saxum Posted May 8, 2018 Posted May 8, 2018 9 hours ago, buffalobloodfloridahome said: He was considered a liability in New England because he wasn't a great pass blocker or pass catching RB and it made their offense predictable when he was in it was almost always a run. When they noticed he was not versatile enough he lost playing time and became dispensable. Honestly don't need him back on our roster with Ivory already here, we have that goal line smasher which was Gilly's forte. Would rather have him than Ivory.
ROCBillsBeliever Posted May 8, 2018 Posted May 8, 2018 On 5/6/2018 at 9:42 AM, Magox said: Yet another good recent decision by the Bills. Wait... According to many "in the know posters" on here, the kinds who attend "high level business meetings" and have "trusted sources," the Bills are not allowed to make good decisions! How can this be? Please explain, please, oh font of great knowledge...
Recommended Posts