ExiledInIllinois Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 Clay Bennett is great. He works for The Christian Science Monitor and has been following GWB for sometime. I think that he was one of the first to see a totally different GWB. A person that others don't see? Clay Bennett Here is a funny one: Biology Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 As for WMD, maybe you should read the Duelfer report when you're not snacking on Hot Pockets or getting your news from cartoons. 287576[/snapback] Yeah, like that is going to happen. If you can't condense it into a soundbite, the lefties like BH have no desire. Just see BH's response and that tells a lot. Of course, I am suprised BH didn't post anything about DeLay or Terry in his post. It seems to be BH's answer to everything. Of course, what do you expect when they need cartoons to make their point. Terry Bad DeLay Bad Bush Bad <Ding> Hot Pockets are done....mmmm...Ham and Cheese <drool> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 Yeah, like that is going to happen. If you can't condense it into a soundbite, the lefties like BH have no desire. Just see BH's response and that tells a lot. Of course, I am suprised BH didn't post anything about DeLay or Terry in his post. It seems to be BH's answer to everything. Of course, what do you expect when they need cartoons to make their point. Terry Bad DeLay Bad Bush Bad <Ding> Hot Pockets are done....mmmm...Ham and Cheese <drool> 288098[/snapback] Hey... Cartoons have been around a long, long time... They have historical relevance. Artists even win Pulitzer Prizes for their work. Now if they just had ones that you could color in with your own crayons, I would be all set! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 Hey... Cartoons have been around a long, long time... They have historical relevance. Artists even win Pulitzer Prizes for their work. Now if they just had ones that you could color in with your own crayons, I would be all set! 288101[/snapback] They also win Pulitzers for childrens stories, which have also been around for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 They also win Pulitzers for childrens stories, which have also been around for a long time. 288103[/snapback] You aren't slacking children's literature? Ya... But, they weren't revered as they are today and in the last 50 or so years. If you were a children's writer years ago, you were professionally derided as falling back on lesser work. I think writers like E.B. White and C.S. Lewis changed all that? I don't think political cartoons have ever been slacked? Sheeesh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 I guess we are supposed to believe you would have supported invading Afghanistan prior to September 2001. 288017[/snapback] Given factual proof of a plot by al Quada (harbored by the Taliban) to attack the USA pre September 11, I would have supported a preemptive invasion of Afghanistan. Did I miss something? Was it even an option? Did Dubya deem the al Quada threat to be anything more than an inconvenience at that point? But then again, I supported the invasion of Iraq based on the lies spewed by this administration prior to this war. I made the mistake of trusting this president, like so many others. Now I know better, unlike many here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmac17 Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 The supposed "liberal" NY Times had to publish a retraction in its editorial page for falling for the nonsense WMD line hook, line and sinker, just like every other "mainstream" media outlet. They didn't publish a retraction for falling for the Bush WMD nonsense, they published a retraction apologizing for being duped by their own sources. You see, people do lie and people of all intelligence levels sometimes believe these people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 27, 2005 Share Posted March 27, 2005 They also win Pulitzers for childrens stories, which have also been around for a long time. 288103[/snapback] Oh... Just thinking about it. Children's, the two big ones are: Caldecott Medal is for illustration and Newberry Medal is for literature. Those I take have been only recent?... Within the last 90 years when children's lit has begun to get it's due? Newberry... 1922 to present. Caldcott... 1938 to present. Your argument doesn't hold water. Since political cartoons predate the acceptance of children's lit? Political cartoons do have historical relevance and have been taken seriously far longer. Any comment? Hope this clarifies my previous argument? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Dick Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 Now seriously....just who is Jeff Gannon? http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll...50376/1039/LIFE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts