Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

OT Mo Porter

WR Robert Foster
OT Gerhard de Beer
DE Mat Boesen
CB Ryan Carter
K Tyler Davis
G Wilson Bell
CB Levi Wallace
G Ike Boettger 

DE Mike Love

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Griff28 said:

OT Mo Porter

WR Robert Foster
OT Gerhard de Beer
DE Mat Boesen
CB Ryan Carter
K Tyler Davis
G Wilson Bell
CB Levi Wallace
G Ike Boettger 

DE Mike Love

thank you!

Posted
48 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Not that’s it’s the Bible, but Wallace had a higher PFF rating last year than Jaire Alexander.

The same Jaire that got torched by Proehl for 120 yds last year. By our 7th rd pick that some here were considering to be nepotism.

3 minutes ago, Cripple Creek said:

 Kind of a small list so far. How many more do you think will be brought in. Seems like the cream of the crop goes in the first 24 hours.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, njbuff said:

Thru this whole draft process, I can’t beli they didn’t bring in one RB.

 

I am shocked by this.

 

But, this thing isn’t over , so I’ll assume they’ll have a young RB at some point.

 

 

I am surprised as well........the 3rd RB job here is perhaps the most winnable in the NFL you'd figure they would get one in UDFA.

 

But with an influx of good young backs maybe we see some vets get cut loose.    

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

I am surprised as well........the 3rd RB job here is perhaps the most winnable in the NFL you'd figure they would get one in UDFA.

 

But with an influx of good young backs maybe we see some vets get cut loose.    

 

Yup.  Like Gillislee. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup.  Like Gillislee. 

 

 

He's almost too obvious.........the successful Buffalo past plus now being experienced in the EP/Patriots offense that Dabol's will be based around.

Posted
38 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

He's almost too obvious.........the successful Buffalo past plus now being experienced in the EP/Patriots offense that Dabol's will be based around.

I gladly accept "too obvious "

Posted
1 hour ago, Eric Moulds on my A** said:

The same Jaire that got torched by Proehl for 120 yds last year. By our 7th rd pick that some here were considering to be nepotism.

 Kind of a small list so far. How many more do you think will be brought in. Seems like the cream of the crop goes in the first 24 hours.

 

 

I believe this brings the roster to 87, so technically they can only bring in three more before they start dropping people.

Posted
59 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

I am surprised as well........the 3rd RB job here is perhaps the most winnable in the NFL you'd figure they would get one in UDFA.

 

But with an influx of good young backs maybe we see some vets get cut loose.    

 

Definitely.  I can see WR, RB, and OL from this.  They've been successful with it in the past....  McDermott, Cadett, Thompson, etc.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

I am surprised as well........the 3rd RB job here is perhaps the most winnable in the NFL you'd figure they would get one in UDFA.

 

But with an influx of good young backs maybe we see some vets get cut loose.    

 

Surprised Roc Thomas and Akrum Wadley (swooon) were not brought in....

 

Maybe Gilislee can be had for a 6-7th round pick since the Pats drafted Sony Michel?

Posted
Just now, RocCityRoller said:

Surprised Roc Thomas and Akrum Wadley (swooon) were not brought in....

 

Maybe Gilislee can be had for a 6-7th round pick since the Pats drafted Sony Michel?

 

No need to trade for him.  The Cheaters are sure to release him soon.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Once the UDFAs get signed, we need to do a list.

 

I don't want to start a new thread for it given this one is pinned.

 

Scrolling through every post on every page looking for new names (but finding mostly de beer) is tedious.

Posted
Just now, Shotgunner said:

Once the UDFAs get signed, we need to do a list.

 

I don't want to start a new thread for it given this one is pinned.

 

Scrolling through every post on every page looking for new names (but finding mostly de beer) is tedious.

 

I was going to suggest putting them in the first post, but then I remembered that you can't edit posts after about 10 minutes.  That would have been ideal.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

I was going to suggest putting them in the first post, but then I remembered that you can't edit posts after about 10 minutes.  That would have been ideal.

You can edit the OP indefinitely....

 

Well, not YOU of course, but the original poster can edit the original post as many times and any time after.

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

 

 

I believe this brings the roster to 87, so technically they can only bring in three more before they start dropping people.

88 actually.  That list doesn't show Wilson Bell from Auburn.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Shotgunner said:

You can edit the OP indefinitely....

 

Well, not YOU of course, but the original poster can edit the original post as many times and any time after.

 

I did not realize that.  Thanks. 

 

So get to it, Yolo!

Posted
30 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

 

 

I believe this brings the roster to 87, so technically they can only bring in three more before they start dropping people.

 

After the higher cost rookies are accounted for and leaving some cap cushion that Beane mentioned, that leaves 5 or 6 million that could

still be used on free agents.  I still would like to see him pick up 1-2 offensive players.

×
×
  • Create New...