Justice Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 Sorry, this post isn't about the Bills but this is almost as good. I heard on the radio that a law is to be made that restricts underwear from being shown in public. It can get you ten days in the slammer. I don't know if this is for Florida only or all around the country. It's about time something is gonna be done about idiots that walk around with their pants sagging showing everyone their a**. I don't have a link.
Astrobot Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 Please put "OT" on this post. It means off topic. The title, "Finally" sounds like TD actually signed someone for the O-Line.
crackur Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 Sorry, this post isn't about the Bills but this is almost as good. I heard on the radio that a law is to be made that restricts underwear from being shown in public. It can get you ten days in the slammer. I don't know if this is for Florida only or all around the country. It's about time something is gonna be done about idiots that walk around with their pants sagging showing everyone their a**. I don't have a link. 274406[/snapback] LOL another BUTT end of the joke the same law was shot down in VA.......it won't pass
Justice Posted March 14, 2005 Author Posted March 14, 2005 Please put "OT" on this post. It means off topic. The title, "Finally" sounds like TD actually signed someone for the O-Line. 274410[/snapback] I did put OT.
IDBillzFan Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 Sorry, this post isn't about the Bills but this is almost as good. I heard on the radio that a law is to be made that restricts underwear from being shown in public. It can get you ten days in the slammer. I don't know if this is for Florida only or all around the country. It's about time something is gonna be done about idiots that walk around with their pants sagging showing everyone their a**. I don't have a link. 274406[/snapback] Cogratulations. In one fell swoop you offended half the board by putting up a misleading thread title, and the other half of the board because you don't like the way they dress.
Justice Posted March 14, 2005 Author Posted March 14, 2005 Cogratulations. In one fell swoop you offended half the board by putting up a misleading thread title, and the other half of the board because you don't like the way they dress. 274415[/snapback] .....
Beerball Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 I drove down the freeway on Saturday following a young lady who was a passenger on a motorcycle. For some reason I was forced to follow them for many many miles even though they were barely going the speed limit. After many miles I innocently discovered that the young lady was wearing a thong--much of it (if there is much to a thong) was visible because her jeans had 'scooted' down during the ride. In my opinion it was a very tasteful display. You want to see this type of dress outlawed? I am saddened by your lack of understanding and tolerance.
Justice Posted March 14, 2005 Author Posted March 14, 2005 I drove down the freeway on Saturday following a young lady who was a passenger on a motorcycle. For some reason I was forced to follow them for many many miles even though they were barely going the speed limit. After many miles I innocently discovered that the young lady was wearing a thong--much of it (if there is much to a thong) was visible because her jeans had 'scooted' down during the ride. In my opinion it was a very tasteful display. You want to see this type of dress outlawed? I am saddened by your lack of understanding and tolerance. 274428[/snapback] No my friend, I don't. But how much more often do you see some guy's boxers or even worse briefs on display? I live in Miami where it is 80 degrees all of the time. These dudes show their a** year round. So yeah, I'd gladly give up one for the other.
IDBillzFan Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 No my friend, I don't. But how much more often do you see some guy's boxers or even worse briefs on display? I live in Miami where it is 80 degrees all of the time. These dudes show their a** year round. So yeah, I'd gladly give up one for the other. 274449[/snapback] Don't they get money from the government to help they buy clothes that fit?
Alaska Darin Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 I think somewhere in the Constitution is the phrase: You have the right not to be offended by anything, ever. Keep lauding our legislative retards - until they get to something YOU think should be left alone. Don't worry, eventually it'll happen.
PTS Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 Sorry, this post isn't about the Bills but this is almost as good. I heard on the radio that a law is to be made that restricts underwear from being shown in public. It can get you ten days in the slammer. I don't know if this is for Florida only or all around the country. It's about time something is gonna be done about idiots that walk around with their pants sagging showing everyone their a**. I don't have a link. 274406[/snapback] A lot of you TSWers are being stupid. You think this law only affects thugs that wear the pants at their thighs. On the contrary, this law was introduced because of women wearing pants that hang at their hips. I for one would fight until death before a law gets passed that would force women not to wear revealing clothing, even if it means having to look at thugs' boxers. This law is no good.
ajzepp Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 A lot of you TSWers are being stupid. You think this law only affects thugs that wear the pants at their thighs. On the contrary, this law was introduced because of women wearing pants that hang at their hips. I for one would fight until death before a law gets passed that would force women not to wear revealing clothing, even if it means having to look at thugs' boxers. This law is no good. 274521[/snapback] I'll second that.....especially considering I live in the South.
CoachChuckDickerson Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 I thought you were going to say the Rock was making a brief comeback. I don't care if you wear you underwear on your head. I just don't want to see any hairy crack.
drnykterstein Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 wow, do you really hate underwear that much?
Coach Tuesday Posted March 15, 2005 Posted March 15, 2005 This law better not apply to thongs. Harami, move to Iran if you like laws like these.
ajzepp Posted March 15, 2005 Posted March 15, 2005 Heck, I wear pajamas to work........you can call them scrubs if you wish, but calling snails escargot doesn't make them taste any better. I am pro-underwear.
cåblelady Posted March 15, 2005 Posted March 15, 2005 Heck, I wear pajamas to work........you can call them scrubs if you wish, but calling snails escargot doesn't make them taste any better. I am pro-underwear. 274590[/snapback] pictures ?
patswhiponthebills Posted March 15, 2005 Posted March 15, 2005 its about time these underwear shots disappeared. since these ladies are no longer able to show there fancy panties,they should wear none at all then- that way they can let there pants down with freedom and not worry about a panty fine$$.
Recommended Posts