Bills Done Until Pick 96 Tomorrow - Beane Says the Bills Could Trade Up

[NoSaint]

Just now, Big C said:

 

For a third. Dang. 

 

It’s seemed to be a third for awhile now... just a matter if who would have the highest 

[JoeF]

21 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

They added a 5th and a 7th so now have a 3rd, 4th, 2 5th, 6th and a 7th. They may still love around the board. Hopefully they can get an OL and a WR at 96 and 121. Maybe something like Tyrell Crosby and Dante Pettis?

As always you hit the nail on the head today Kirby with a post.  Superstars come in the top of the first round.  The second and third rounds are Preston Browns.  While we may not like the QB pick -- getting Edmunds follows that philosophy.

[26CornerBlitz]

Following the trades, here is a look at the picks that Buffalo has remaining on Friday and Saturday in the draft.

 

Day Two (Rounds 2-3)

• No. 96

Day Three (Rounds 4-7)

• No. 121
• No. 154
• No. 166
• No. 187

[The Jokeman]

35 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

They added a 5th and a 7th so now have a 3rd, 4th, 2 5th, 6th and a 7th. They may still move around the board. Hopefully they can get an OL and a WR at 96 and 121. Maybe something like Tyrell Crosby and Dante Pettis?

Three 5ths, ours Jacksonville's and Baltimore's.

[Buffalo Barbarian]

Any way we can make a trade for Will Hernandez?

 

 

[Domdab99]

55 minutes ago, Billznut said:

Losing 53, 56 and 65 hurts, especially in this draft where the 2nd and 3rd round was supposedly very strong. If Allen and Edmunds end up being star players it was worth it. Otherwise...Ouch 

 

Using 5 picks to choose Allen and Edmunds is definitely an ouch. 

 

God, I hate trading up. Losing 53, 56, and 65 is not good. 

[Jamie Nails]

Great. We can take the next ed Wang 

[Kirby Jackson]

10 minutes ago, Domdab99 said:

 

Using 5 picks to choose Allen and Edmunds is definitely an ouch. 

 

God, I hate trading up. Losing 53, 56, and 65 is not good. 

That’s why they got these picks. I don’t love  Allen but they went and got their guy at a decent price. Edmunds had no business being on the board and they jumped. He was thought to be a top 10 lock. They saw a potential star, at a position of need, and got it done. I’ll never complain about taking impact players. Bodies are nice but you win with stars. Edmunds could be that (Allen could too).

Edited April 27, 2018 by Kirby Jackson

[Misterbluesky]

1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

Following the trades, here is a look at the picks that Buffalo has remaining on Friday and Saturday in the draft.

 

Day Two (Rounds 2-3)

• No. 96
•  

Day Three (Rounds 4-7)

• No. 121
• No. 154
• No. 166
• No. 187

Not so fast... 

[26CornerBlitz]

Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

That’s why they got these picks. I don’t love  Allen but they went and got their guy at a decent price. Edmunds had no business being on the board and they jumped. He was thought to be a top 10 lock. They saw a potential star, at a position of need, and for it done. I’ll never complain about taking impact players. Bodies are nice but you win with stars. Edmunds could be that (Allen could too).

 

ARZ got better value for Rosen by giving up only a 3rd and a 5th. 

[Domdab99]

Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

That’s why they got these picks. I don’t love  Allen but they went and got their guy at a decent price. Edmunds had no business being on the board and they jumped. He was thought to be a top 10 lock. They saw a potential star, at a position of need, and for it done. I’ll never complain about taking impact players. Bodies are nice but you win with stars. Edmunds could be that (Allen could too).

 

I see your point. I just hate trading up lol!

 

As much as I hated the Allen pick, I'll get on board and pull for him. I hope he can become something. 

[Misterbluesky]

Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

ARZ got better value for Rosen by giving up only a 3rd and a 5th. 

Rosen dropped for a reason.

[H2o]

OL, DT, another LB, a WR. We're coming out this draft with many holes even though we entered with 6 picks in the first 3 rounds

[GunnerBill]

2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

That’s why they got these picks. I don’t love  Allen but they went and got their guy at a decent price. Edmunds had no business being on the board and they jumped. He was thought to be a top 10 lock. They saw a potential star, at a position of need, and for it done. I’ll never complain about taking impact players. Bodies are nice but you win with stars. Edmunds could be that (Allen could too).

 

And the value for Edmunds made sense too, in terms of what we gave up. I wish I could say the same about Allen.

 

I think we have seen an MO for Brandon Beane tonight and it is measurables and ceiling. McDermott had a slightly different MO last year so that is at least interesting. 

 

[26CornerBlitz]

2 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said:

Rosen dropped for a reason.

 

Dropped? He was drafted 3 picks later. Some drop. 

Edited April 27, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz

[Guest K-GunJimKelly12]

Edmunds was worth it.  There is a pretty decent chance that he will be the superstar stud linebacker we need for this defense.  Vander Esch and Evans went shortly after so that says to me that the needed to trade up there to get the guy they wanted.  Allen?  We will see.

[NickelCity]

1 minute ago, Misterbluesky said:

Rosen dropped for a reason.

 

True. Those wacky Bills we all love so much. 

[Kirby Jackson]

1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

And the value for Edmunds made sense too, in terms of what we gave up. I wish I could say the same about Allen.

 

I think we have seen an MO for Brandon Beane tonight and it is measurables and ceiling. McDermott had a slightly different MO last year so that is at least interesting. 

 

If they said Rosen instead of Allen I would be on cloud 9. 

[Misterbluesky]

1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Dropped? he was drafted 3 picks later. Some drop. 

Three picks in the early first round.

[GunnerBill]

1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

If they said Rosen instead of Allen I would be on cloud 9. 

 

Likewise.