{::'KayCeeS::} Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: If I were them, it would be Darnold. Well, if I were them: I don't think any of the QB's is worth the number one pick. At four, sure: Rosen. I don't think Darnold is all he's cracked up to be, and like I said, Mayfield, while a baller, is still short. And Allen is Allen. If I were the Browns, I would take the BPA on their board at 1, and then Rosen at 4. 1
26CornerBlitz Posted April 26, 2018 Author Posted April 26, 2018 Just now, {::'KayCeeS::} said: Well, if I were them: I don't think any of the QB's is worth the number one pick. At four, sure: Rosen. I don't think Darnold is all he's cracked up to be, and like I said, Mayfield, while a baller, is still short. And Allen is Allen. If I were the Browns, I would take the BPA on their board at 1, and then Rosen at 4. Dorsey will not and cannot do that given his charge from the owner and their "Factory of Sadness" legacy.
jrober38 Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 8 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: It makes so much sense. Mayfield is an elite gamer who makes people better. Sit him behind Tyrod for as long as you can, and when his time comes he'll have one of the best offensive supporting casts in the league to play with. Throw in the fact that they might get Barkley at #4, and that offense could be lethal.
BuffaloRebound Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 Giants aren’t taking a QB at 2. I think top 2 QB’s on Bills draft board are Rosen and Mayfield. I don’t think Darnold and Allen are ready to play this year. Getting rid of a Tyrod and signing McCarron points to Bills going after a QB who can play immediately.
K D Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 Just now, jrober38 said: The Giants won't be in a position to draft a top QB again for several years. If they get a shot at Darnold, I don't see anyway they pass on him. It's an unbelievably deep RB class, and they can grab an impact player there in round 2. maybe, but like i said it's the perception that they are giving up on Eli which is what got the previous regime fired. the ownership very much wants a gm/coach that can win now with Eli. you are right, that would be the smart move. i just don't think they are in a position to do that
thenorthremembers Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: The Giants won't be in a position to draft a top QB again for several years. If they get a shot at Darnold, I don't see anyway they pass on him. It's an unbelievably deep RB class, and they can grab an impact player there in round 2. The Giants no longer have a #1 pass rusher. They have Vernon who is a nice supplement, but don't be surprised when they take Bradley Chubb at 2. I think Cleveland trades out of four to move down for a LT and Barkley slides to #5 to the Broncos.
cle23 Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 10 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: If Darnold gets to #4 and a bidding war starts, the Bills are squarely in the driver's seat. People keep mentioning Arizona, but it will for sure take 2019 #1 for them to get up there, they dont have the ammo not to. Patriots are a wild card, but I'd be surprised if they move up for Darnold. I agree that Buffalo has the most draft capital to move up, and would probably win the bid, but it'll drive up the cost to have Darnold there and a bunch of teams interested.
jrober38 Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, kdiggz said: maybe, but like i said it's the perception that they are giving up on Eli which is what got the previous regime fired. the ownership very much wants a gm/coach that can win now with Eli. you are right, that would be the smart move. i just don't think they are in a position to do that "Giving up" on Eli for #2 pick is a lot different than giving up on him for Geno Smith. There's no way they don't pick Darnold if he's available. 2 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: The Giants no longer have a #1 pass rusher. They have Vernon who is a nice supplement, but don't be surprised when they take Bradley Chubb at 2. I think Cleveland trades out of four to move down for a LT and Barkley slides to #5 to the Broncos. QB is exponentially more important that a pass rusher.
sullim4 Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, McBean said: The GIANTS are taking Darnold! Book it. That's my feeling as well if CLE passes on him. If I were a Giants fan, I'd be super pissed if my team passed on a quarterback...
cle23 Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, thenorthremembers said: The Giants no longer have a #1 pass rusher. They have Vernon who is a nice supplement, but don't be surprised when they take Bradley Chubb at 2. I think Cleveland trades out of four to move down for a LT and Barkley slides to #5 to the Broncos. There are no elite LT in this draft, and Coleman was decent at RT last year and is moving back to his more natural LT position. If McGlinchey drops to the 20s I could see it, but they aren't desperate for a LT.
Andrew Son Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, McBean said: The GIANTS are taking Darnold! Book it. Then we are !@#$ed... If it goes Mayfield, Darnold, Rosen, we made a massive mistake not going up to 3
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 56 minutes ago, horned dogs said: If its Mayfield then it goes 1. Cle Mayfield 2. NYG Barkley 3. NYJ Darnold 4. Buf Rosen or 1. Cle Mayfield 2. Buf Darnold/Rosen 3 NYJ Darnold/ Rosen Giants have seemed to indicate they would grab Darnold at 2 or not take a QB.
thenorthremembers Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, jrober38 said: "Giving up" on Eli for #2 pick is a lot different than giving up on him for Geno Smith. There's no way they don't pick Darnold if he's available. QB is exponentially more important that a pass rusher. QB is more important than pass rusher, I agree. Except the Giants already have a Hall of Fame quarterback, and another prospect developing behind him. I completely disagree. I think the Darnold smoke has been 100% about trying to rob people of draft picks. 2
Bills of Boston Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 Ppl that are sure giants would take Darnold if there at 2.. why do you think they would have made it so clear if they REALLY wanted him with a qb needy team ahead of them? doesnt seem to jive w it being true to me.. to me it’s so Cleveland passes on their non qb they’d want or driving up asking price.
Jay_Fixit Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 8 minutes ago, McBean said: The GIANTS are taking Darnold! Book it. I think they’d still take Barkley. 1
BuffaloRebound Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 5 minutes ago, McBean said: The GIANTS are taking Darnold! Book it. Unless they have a trade in place for Eli or he’s in on the con job and announces his retirement after the draft, there’s no way in hell they are taking a QB at 2. He is too beloved by the fan base to do something like that to him, even if it’s the smart long term thing to do.
jrober38 Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: QB is more important than pass rusher, I agree. Except the Giants already have a Hall of Fame quarterback, and another prospect developing behind him. I completely disagree. I think the Darnold smoke has been 100% about trying to rob people of draft picks. Ugh. Eli is 37 and hasn't been good in years. Davis Webb is just a guy until he proves otherwise. They have an opportunity to solidify the QB position for the next 10+ years. No chance they pass that up.
{::'KayCeeS::} Posted April 26, 2018 Posted April 26, 2018 10 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Dorsey will not and cannot do that given his charge from the owner and their "Factory of Sadness" legacy. Yes, I agree they will take a QB 1st: I just wouldn't do it.
Recommended Posts