Happy Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 21 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: You dislike Barkley that much? No, not that i dislike Barkley. It is more that I think the Giants are in the perfect situation to get a top 3 QB to replace Eli Manning in a couple of years. The NYG situation would be similar to when the Packers drafted Aaron Rodgers to sit behind Brett Favre for three seasons; not that I'm comparing any of the rookie QBs to Aaron Rodgers, but I think you can see what I'm getting at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mabden Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 (edited) Couple of things on the stand that RB's do not win Super Bowls: If Marshawn Lynch had been given the ball at the goal line, Seattle wins the game, Lynch is voted MVP. Most Super Bowl winning teams have had great complimentary running backs; Marcus Allen, Franco Harris, Emmitt Smith, Roger Craig , Terrell Davis, Larry Csonka, Edgerrin James, Edited April 25, 2018 by mabden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 4 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said: No, not that i dislike Barkley. It is more that I think the Giants are in the perfect situation to get a top 3 QB to replace Eli Manning in a couple of years. The NYG situation would be similar to when the Packers drafted Aaron Rodgers to sit behind Brett Favre for three seasons; not that I'm comparing any of the rookie QBs to Aaron Rodgers, but I think you can see what I'm getting at. You said that if Gettelman does draft Barkley, you would fire him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiotAct Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 Giants are 100% taking a QB in the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: You said that if Gettelman does draft Barkley, you would fire him... Yes, because I think the Giants are better served by drafting a QB with the #2 pick in the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 21 minutes ago, GG said: Well, based on the other thread you can take Lamar off the board. Best guess is that Beane is highly confident he'll trade into #2 or #4 Yeah I guess so then........ I don't envy Beane........he stepped to the plate with a strike against him when McD/Whaley botched the first round trade last year. Doesn't have the luxury of punting again this time. Good thing they at least picked a good player in White or there would be real gnashing of teeth over having passed on a QB then or not doing enough due diligence to get a deal done with then QB-less Houston rather than perennial playoff team in his buddy Andy Reid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 Just now, Happy Gilmore said: Yes, because I think the Giants are better served by drafting a QB with the #2 pick in the first round. Just busting on you! I totally agree and have been saying so for weeks. This is a crucial junction for the Giants. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 The giants should steer right into Barkley and not screw our QB options Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 At this point I would be absolutely floored if the Giants did not take Barkley... Every time I see or hear things from the mountain of folks who think they should not, or mock a QB to them because that's what they think the Giants should do, I think...well...sure...If I was the Giants GM I'd Draft a QB too...But are you not just completely wasting your time worrying about it? Because literally every sign...I mean EVERY hint..says they are going to go with Barkley...They think he's beyond special...And there's reason to believe...in just that aspect of the equation...they could be right... They're old-school football and they are going with the sure thing...They are envisioning the potential of putting Beckham, Engram, and Barkley on the field at the same time and what that means for Defenses trying to figure out how to stop it...They feel it will add a year or two to Eli's career by doing this, and it will instantly make them Playoff contenders...Now..They could be dead wrong about all of it...It may be the mistake of the century...But it certainly seems to be what they're thinking...So...Why fight it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay_Fixit Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 1 hour ago, BuffaloRush said: Try Northern Iowa: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Warner Who in the blue hell was hat? You were talking about Kurt Warner... Nope. We’re all talking about the correct player. You’re not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRush Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 59 minutes ago, RiotAct said: Giants are 100% taking a QB in the first round. Ok so I guess those reports from every credible source that says they are NOT taking a QB are BS? @RiotAct I will bet you a $20 gift card that NYG does not draft a QB at #2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiotAct Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 On 4/25/2018 at 2:37 PM, BuffaloRush said: Ok so I guess those reports from every credible source that says they are NOT taking a QB are BS? @RiotAct I will bet you a $20 gift card that NYG does not draft a QB at #2 I am so glad I didn’t take this bet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts