Tipster19 Posted April 25, 2018 Posted April 25, 2018 If Cleveland wants to guarantee their player of choice by staying with the #4 pick and still get their QB of choice with the #1 pick overall. All they would have to do is help make sure that the Giants trades out of the #2 pick.
cle23 Posted April 25, 2018 Posted April 25, 2018 How do you suggest the "help" without doing anything?
ddaryl Posted April 25, 2018 Posted April 25, 2018 (edited) I am curious more details please Edited April 25, 2018 by ddaryl
McBean Posted April 25, 2018 Posted April 25, 2018 We’re less than 48 hours away. We can all do this. 1 1
BuffaloBillyG Posted April 25, 2018 Posted April 25, 2018 8 minutes ago, cle23 said: How do you suggest the "help" without doing anything?
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted April 25, 2018 Posted April 25, 2018 I just had a semi rational thought. Maybe I should make a thread about it ? 6 minutes ago, McBean said: We’re less than 48 hours away. We can all do this. This is tough man. But I can’t turn away either. It’s like watching a car crash, but there’s 15-20 a day. You just keep watching it happen 1 1
Tipster19 Posted April 25, 2018 Author Posted April 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, No Place To Hyde said: Ok, I probably should have said that it would be in Cleveland’s interest to see the Giants trade out of their #2 pick instead of saying that they could help. They could make a bs trade with the team that is trading up and over compensate them, they have plenty of picks. Hey, the point is Cleveland could get a QB of choice (best QB overall?) and get the best player in the draft that’s not a QB. That’s like having 2 #1 pick overall.
Recommended Posts