teef Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said: This would make sense for him to fall. 1) Darnold (Browns) 2) Rosen (Bills) 3) Mayfield (Jets) 4) Chubb (Browns) 5) Nelson (Broncos) 6) Barkley (Giants) can't see Denver taking Barkley, and everyone is happy here. i think this is exactly how it fell. not sure if the broncos took nelson, but they had the browns taking chubb at 4 and skipping on barkley.
NickelCity Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 If we trade up for Allen when Rosen is available...oof. 5 1
Bleedingreennc Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, NickelCity said: If we trade up for Allen when Rosen is available...oof. That will be a bad move for any team. 1
Shaw66 Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 11 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: I believe it. And then the Giants are so committed to Barkley, that they wouldn't take 2 more first round picks for #2?? C'mon. If Darnold is taken at 1, the Bills should be able to get Rosen at 2. I just don't see it. If the Giants want a QB they aren't moving back. If they love some other guy, they aren't moving back, because back means behind the Browns and maybe behind the Broncos. They'll worry that they'll lose their guy. Only way the Giants are trading back is if they don't want a QB and they aren't in love with a non-QB. Seems pretty unlikely. 1
TheFunPolice Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 PERFECT! Giants won't be tempted to go QB now, pushing everyone down a notch. I still think it's Jackson, which intrigues me, but I would love a trade up just for the excitement.
RollBillsRoll Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, Binghamton Beast said: If the Bills are able to trade up and either of Darnold/Rosen are available, and they pass, I will **** my pants in rage. LOL! You owe me a new keyboard! That will for sure show them!
Bleedingreennc Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 Spot on, too much movement. If they are going to trade it would be with you guys.
Captain Murica Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 Damn, put this in the Mayfield thread about 40 minutes ago...
Bag of Milk Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 7 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: How do you accidentally tweet that anyway? In my experience, accidental tweets only happen when you're drunk. Is Albright drunk? No, he is just is in love with himself and wants more attention.
Shaw66 Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 6 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: The point of getting up to #2 is to leap-frog the Jets, so they don't take the QB we want. Yes, it would be nice to get ahead of the Jets. But unless someone can give the Giants #4, they aren't moving back. And maybe, just maybe, the Bills and Jets want different guys. So the Browns could get their fav at 1, the Jets get their fav at 3 AND the Bills get their fav at 5. Even that seems possible, because there sure doesn't seem to be a clear consensus about the QBs.
Woodman19 Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 Was probably a source from Darnold that leaked it.
BuffAlone Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 He was told that was his only early scoop. If he blew it, he'd never be in the loop again? Possible
Fadingpain Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 I have believed (feared) for a while that Cleveland will take Darnold #1 overall. Has nothing to do with this tweet, but I think that's going to happen. Question is what happens next. I hope I am wrong and the Browns take Allen; don't think we will be that lucky.
CommonCents Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 I can’t wait until Thursday so I don’t have to see anything from Allbright for the rest of the summer. He is his own biggest fan. 2
teef Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 6 minutes ago, Shaw66 said: I just don't see it. If the Giants want a QB they aren't moving back. If they love some other guy, they aren't moving back, because back means behind the Browns and maybe behind the Broncos. They'll worry that they'll lose their guy. Only way the Giants are trading back is if they don't want a QB and they aren't in love with a non-QB. Seems pretty unlikely. apparently the only qb they want that high is darnold. i think that's the basis for trades.
US Egg Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 These "draftniks" gloat as if they're experts even when they don't get any picks right in the 1st round. Only other "profession" that kind of ineptitude be tolerated is in civil service. 1
TheFunPolice Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 could be Dorsey finally told Hue, who ran right to his buddies in the press, knowing he's on the way out anyway... EXCEPT IT WAS THE CLASSIC "RAT TRAP."
K D Posted April 24, 2018 Author Posted April 24, 2018 It's also worth noting that Allbright is based out of Denver and covers the Broncos primarily and it is his belief that they will be trading back with the Bills for 12 and 22 and targeting Ward at CB and Hernandez at G with those picks. Bills moving up for Allen or Rosen 2
BillsFan17 Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 15 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: The point of getting up to #2 is to leap-frog the Jets, so they don't take the QB we want. I'm so confident in the Jets ineptitude, that whatever QB they want, probably is the worst one of the class. This is the same GM who drafted Hack' in the second. 2 1
Sherman Posted April 24, 2018 Posted April 24, 2018 20 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: I don’t get it. If he knows or thinks he knows, why did he delete it? He usually likes to throw a parade when he spouts off info. I was assuming it was because the NFL has asked all teams and media not to tip their picks.
Recommended Posts