Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

4-24: Ian Rapoport on One Bills Live (8:23)

 

Rapoport - Brandon Beane and Dave Gettleman know each other well and they could get a deal done quickly for the 2nd pick, but I don't think the Giants want to fall back that far. #Bills #NFLDraft

 

Rapoport - I would be surprised if Darnold or Mayfield are available after the 4th pick. The other quarterbacks I can see being available. Allen and Rosen are guys who could fall, and I can see the #Bills making moves up for them. #NFLDraft

 

Rapoport - If you go through the reports, you can put almost every quarterback at the 1st pick to the Browns. No one really knows. Mayfield shouldn't be ruled out for the #1 pick, but is he the guy? No. #NFLDraft

 

 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted
1 minute ago, garybusey said:

The highlight of this was Tasker speculating the Browns take a QB at 1 & 4 :lol: What a doof.

 

If they're smart that's what they should do. 

 

Would double their chance of finding "the guy" and they still have plenty of other picks to improve the team with. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, garybusey said:

The highlight of this was Tasker speculating the Browns take a QB at 1 & 4 :lol: What a doof.

 

He was interrupting the flow of the conversation with terrible off the wall questions. Man he is bad!

Posted
9 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

If they're smart that's what they should do. 

 

Would double their chance of finding "the guy" and they still have plenty of other picks to improve the team with. 

 

And if they both turn out, one of them is worth a 1st or more in trade.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

If they're smart that's what they should do. 

 

Would double their chance of finding "the guy" and they still have plenty of other picks to improve the team with. 

 

That's exactly what they should not do.  There's no way they have enough practice reps to develop two rookie QBs under the limitations of the current CBA. 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
1 minute ago, BobChalmers said:

 

And if they both turn out, one of them is worth a 1st or more in trade.

 

Exactly. 

 

They might not wind up with an elite QB, but their odds would be better of having one really good guy if they pick two of them. 

 

If both work out, trade him for a king's ransom in 2 years. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, BobChalmers said:

 

And if they both turn out, one of them is worth a 1st or more in trade.

 

How would you know both turned out? 

Posted
14 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

If they're smart that's what they should do. 

 

Would double their chance of finding "the guy" and they still have plenty of other picks to improve the team with. 

So they should punt on a double digit sack guy opposite Garrett for a backup QB?!? That’s a good way to get fired. Just get the QB decision right; that’s what they get paid to do. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

So they should punt on a double digit sack guy opposite Garrett for a backup QB?!? That’s a good way to get fired. Just get the QB decision right; that’s what they get paid to do. 

 

The numbers say that it's really hard to "get it right". 

 

Having two really good pass rushers means nothing if they don't have a QB. 

 

They need to walk away with this draft with a franchise QB to build around for the next 10 years. Picking two elite QB prospects all but guarantees that happens. 

Edited by jrober38
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

The numbers say that it's really hard to "get it right". 

 

Having two really good pass rushers means nothing if they don't have a QB. 

 

They need to walk away with this draft with a franchise QB to build around for the next 10 years. Picking two elite QB prospects all but guarantees that happens. 

 

The only thing it would guarantee is disaster. Neither guy would sign until one of them is traded.  

Posted
Just now, BuffaloRebound said:

 

The only thing it would guarantee is disaster. Neither guy would sign until one of them is traded.  

 

Why on earth would that happen? They don't think they can win the job?

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Pre1236 said:

I have no idea how Tasker continues to be employed. Really pretty amazing.

Tasker is a good guy and was a great Bill, but clearly he took way too many shots to the head in his career. He is brutal, his thoughts and way of speaking are all over the place and impossible to follow. It’s tough to have to suffer through him and Murph just to get some decent Bills coverage. 

Edited by Billznut
Posted

Lol the "draft 2 QB's" truthers are here. Nevermind that there's not enough reps or playing time, or that you are passing on top playmakers to help your team. Draft all of the QB's and figure it out later

Posted
1 minute ago, kdiggz said:

Lol the "draft 2 QB's" truthers are here. Nevermind that there's not enough reps or playing time, or that you are passing on top playmakers to help your team. Draft all of the QB's and figure it out later

 

If there aren't enough reps, why do any NFL teams draft developmental 3rd string QBs? 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Pre1236 said:

I have no idea how Tasker continues to be employed. Really pretty amazing.

Terrible as a commentator and worse as a sports show host- make it stop! To make matters worse, Brandon is going to be at the draft table- looks like Beane isnt as powerful as we thought.

Edited by billsfan_34
Posted
19 minutes ago, BobChalmers said:

 

And if they both turn out, one of them is worth a 1st or more in trade.

how would both turn out....do you play them both...taking QBs at 1 & 4 would not be smart

Posted
1 minute ago, jrober38 said:

 

If there aren't enough reps, why do any NFL teams draft developmental 3rd string QBs? 

What team spends a top 5 pick on a 3rd string QB? Those guys are after thoughts knowing that 9 out of 10 will be busts. Also since 2010, no QB has sat for 1 yr or more and turned out being a franchise QB. You only get better by playing

×
×
  • Create New...