Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

When I hear that I think of Shanny making an offense that RGIII excelled in as a rookie yet once he got back from injury he couldn't produce again. I'm sorry but if Lamar is another Vick, RG III or Watson  insert your favorite RPO QB here we're in trouble as those offenses eventually fail as their QB ends up injured and then when you try to protect them in the pocket they fail because they can't play a traditional offense. 

 

Wentz?

Posted
3 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

my final QB "big 6" board:

 

Rosen

Mayfield

Darnold

Rudolph

Jackson

Allen

362154 . . .  Jackson is the only one where we have agreement.  Maybe you should move him to 6 just for giggles.

Posted
1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It was pretty tough to hear Dilfer express skepticism in the Bills' ability to develop a QB. 

Funny how you give it more credence when it comes from a TV talking head.  

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, GG said:

Funny how you give it more credence when it comes from a TV talking head.  

 

Weak point. All talking heads are not equal.  I respect his opinion because of who he is, but ultimately he doesn't know.

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted
21 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Weak point. All talking heads are not equal.  I respect his opinion because of who he is, but ultimately he doesn't know.

Doesn't matter whether the taking heads are equal or not.  You dismiss opinions here, yet accept the same opinion from a talking head. 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, GG said:

Doesn't matter whether the taking heads are equal or not.  You dismiss opinions here, yet accept the same opinion from a talking head. 

 

I dismiss opinions I disagree with regardless of the source if  I don't find them plausible or they don't make sense. 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted
2 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It was pretty tough to hear Dilfer express skepticism in the Bills' ability to develop a QB. 

This concern has been expressed many time on TBD.  We need to hire a qb guru. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It was pretty tough to hear Dilfer express skepticism in the Bills' ability to develop a QB. 

 

Thats because the Bills haven’t been developed a good QB for like 45 years

 

Kelly doesn’t count because he was developed in the USFL

Edited by Buffalo716
Posted
3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

I dismiss opinions I disagree with regardless of the source if  I don't find them plausible or they don't make sense. 

Except in this case it was the same opinion expressed in two different threads, yet you dismissed one and agreed with the other.  

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, longtimebillsfan said:

This concern has been expressed many time on TBD.  We need to hire a qb guru. 

 

They have Culley and Daboll who'll have to make it happen because I can't see any changes to McDermott's staff coming anytime soon.  Since it seems that drafting a QB has been the plan for quite some time, they must be comfortable with these guys.

 

1 minute ago, GG said:

Except in this case it was the same opinion expressed in two different threads, yet you dismissed one and agreed with the other.  

 

No. All I said that is that Culley is here as the QB coach and I don't see changes coming to the staff. 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted
2 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It was pretty tough to hear Dilfer express skepticism in the Bills' ability to develop a QB. 

 

Why? everyone and their mother knows they're historically bad at it.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

They have Culley and Daboll who'll have to make it happen because I can't see any changes to McDermott's staff coming anytime soon.  Since it seems that drafting a QB has been the plan for quite some time, they must be comfortable with these guys.

 

 

No. All I said that is that Culley is here as the QB coach and I don't see changes coming to the staff. 

So suddenly you're not as concerned with Culley and Dabol developing a QB, despite never having done so in the past?

 

Never mind that Dabol will need to devote more time to the offense and not just the QB

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

Why? everyone and their mother knows they're historically bad at it.

 

I took "tough to hear" as meaning "regrettable, but likely true."  One has to hope Dabol and Culley are legit, though there isn't a lot to foster optimism.

Edited by Dr. Who
Posted
Just now, GG said:

So suddenly you're not as concerned with Culley and Dabol developing a QB, despite never having done so in the past?

 

Never mind that Dabol will need to devote more time to the offense and not just the QB

 

I don't know whether they can or not as neither has ever had the opportunity at the NFL level.  It's not my job to be concerned or not. You're propagating some false argument here. 

Posted
2 hours ago, kdiggz said:

we don't have anyone who can develop a QB.  they better go for the sure thing.  if they draft a "project QB" and think they will get better then they are dumb 

 

Sure thing? Which one is that? 

 

-The short gimmick offense guy?

-the twice concussed bratty statue guy? 

-the not so strong armed turnover machine guy? 

-or the inaccurate incompletion machine guy?

 

yes a bit of hyperbole... but there is no sure thing in the draft. 

 

See Andrew luck draft... that was as close to a sure thing as we have seen in a very long time 

Posted
6 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

I don't know whether they can or not as neither has ever had the opportunity at the NFL level.  It's not my job to be concerned or not. You're propagating some false argument here. 

But it's clearly your job to mock posters who do express the concern that the biggest investment the franchise is going to make will fall under the care of guys who have never done this job before. 

Posted
2 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It was pretty tough to hear Dilfer express skepticism in the Bills' ability to develop a QB. 

 

It may be telling. Does anyone here love Dabols resume?  He’s been the first real head scratching hire for me, and he has the biggest mess to tackle 

Posted
Just now, GG said:

But it's clearly your job to mock posters who do express the concern that the biggest investment the franchise is going to make will fall under the care of guys who have never done this job before. 

 

Clearly you are feeling some kind of butt hurt when I did no such thing because all I pointed out was that there would be no changes to the coaching staff.  Sorry you feel aggrieved. 

×
×
  • Create New...