Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
40 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

That's the perfect way to continue nondescript mediocrity towards continuing irrelevance. 

Oh, it’s not what I want, I was just playing along. I want us to identify the ONE QB we want and then do whatever it takes to go get him.  If that means trading up then trade as high as you need to, even if it’s #2.

Posted
Just now, buffaloboyinATL said:

Oh, it’s not what I want, I was just playing along. I want us to identify the ONE QB we want and then do whatever it takes to go get him.  If that means trading up then trade as high as you need to, even if it’s #2.

 

Gotcha!

Posted

We go 7-9 this year.  Next year 5-11. Beane and McDermotte both fired in ‘19. 

 

We will draft a qb in top 5. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
55 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

That's the perfect way to continue nondescript mediocrity towards continuing irrelevance. 

Your Buffalo Bills 2000-2018    The Pursuit of Mediocrity

Posted
20 minutes ago, Carter said:

We go 7-9 this year.  Next year 5-11. Beane and McDermotte both fired in ‘19. 

 

We will draft a qb in top 5. 

 

 

 

 

I want us to get our QB this year, even if we have to trade up to get him, BUT I disagree that we would go 7-9 and then 5-11 with AJ., especially  with all of the talent we will be able to add this year if we didn’t trade up.

 

but again, I want the QB

Posted
1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

That's the perfect way to continue nondescript mediocrity towards another generation of irrelevance. 

 

What else would you have them do then?

Posted
15 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Get the QB they have needed for 22 years. Period.

 

And if they go 

 

Allen - Cle

Darnold - Giants

Mayfield - Jets

Barkley - Browns

Rosen - Broncos 

 

Then what?  

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Virgil said:

 

And if they go 

 

Allen - Cle

Darnold - Giants

Mayfield - Jets

Barkley - Browns

Rosen - Broncos 

 

Then what?  

 

I'd take Jackson.  They have the ammo to trade up so and I don't see your scenario playing out. 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted
1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

I'd take Jackson.  They have the ammo to trade up so and I don't see your scenario playing out. 

 

I don’t either. But that’s the question being asked 

Posted
Just now, Virgil said:

 

I don’t either. But that’s the question being asked 

 

Invalid question IMO based on what the GM has talked sbout as his #1 priority in combination with the draft capital they have accumulated. 

1 minute ago, Bleedingreennc said:

Stats don't lie. He also played in the ACC, which isn't that strong of a conference overall.

 

You must be kidding.  There is plenty of good talent in the ACC and his stats have been excellent.   That said it's about much more than stats as they can lie about NFL potential. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Invalid question IMO based on what the GM has talked sbout as his #1 priority in combination with the draft capital they have accumulated. 

 

You must be kidding.  There is plenty of good talent in the ACC and his stats have been excellent.   That said it's about much more than stats as they can lie about NFL potential. 

57% completion percentage? And people are knocking Allen?

Posted
Just now, Bleedingreennc said:

57% completion percentage? And people are knocking Allen?

 

With a huge drop percentage.  You have not watched him much I can tell that. 

Posted
1 hour ago, 1billsfan said:

 

Totally agree with this.

 

I also think that the supposed "Top 4 QBs" have been much overhyped. I just read an article that said Darnold looks like a cow on ice when he plays, and you know what? I agree with him! LOL

 

If they don't have a strong conviction on a QB to the threshold of throwing a boat load high drafts picks at a team like the Giants, Broncos or Colts to move up, then they would be doing the franchise a huge disservice by making the move to just appease fans.

 

My hope is that if they do miss out on one of their guys (if it's true they even like one of them), then pick the "home run" "wild card" QB Lamar Jackson at #12. Go big or go home, there's no sense in playing it safe with an average talented QB like Rudolph. Swing for the fences with Jackson, and still have picks #22, #53, #56, #65, #95 to solidify the building process. They have AJ there to start for the whole season, so Jackson will have this season to learn and not be pushed into the starting role.

 

 

 

I could absolutely live with this. :thumbsup:

×
×
  • Create New...