Foxx Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 (edited) On 4/23/2018 at 10:00 PM, horned dogs said: Almost sounds like Beane talking to Gettleman doesn't it! Expand i suppose you can't blame Gettleman for trying to get the most for his pick. Edited April 23, 2018 by Foxx
BuffAlone Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 9:49 PM, kdiggz said: The only way we get to 2 is by trading up to 4-6 before the draft Expand I believe that. Gettlman will not be permitted by the Mara's to go any further without MAJOR capital coming back. His hands are tied, to an extent
MAJBobby Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:00 PM, John from Riverside said: Not if Rosen slides Expand If they dont come away from Thursday without Rosen, Darnold, Mayfield (Maybe Allen). They failed. And Seat starts getting hot 1 1 1
Putin Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 9:42 PM, ddaryl said: The way it looks now number 5 with Denver is the target Expand And who are we targeting??
John from Riverside Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:02 PM, MAJBobby said: If they dont come away from Thursday without Rosen, Darnold, Mayfield (Maybe Allen). They failed. And Seat starts getting hot Expand 5 should get us into one of those qbs
FLFan Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 Sounds like some gamesmanship by Beane to me. The Bills are in the drivers seat for that pick, if Gettleman wants to trade, and if the Bills choose to do it.
John from Riverside Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 I personally dont think we need to get to 2 for this to be a success One of these top 4 qbs are gonna fall.......not everyone is gonna take a qb With every pick the cost becomes a little less
MAJBobby Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:03 PM, John from Riverside said: 5 should get us into one of those qbs Expand And if it doesnt Failure 1
Roundybout Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:09 PM, MAJBobby said: And if it doesnt Failure Expand Can't officially call it a failure until we see these guys pan out, but yeah the Process will lose some credibility if they don't snag one.
MAJBobby Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:07 PM, John from Riverside said: I personally dont think we need to get to 2 for this to be a success One of these top 4 qbs are gonna fall.......not everyone is gonna take a qb With every pick the cost becomes a little less Expand And with every Pick Risk that you are getting shut out more and morr
Mark92 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 If this team was only 3-4 starting draft picks away from really contending in the AFC I would be OK with them missing on one of the top 4 QB's. However that's not the case. We MUST get one of them and I hope it's the either #1 or #2 on their chart. It sucks that not trading and adding 6 possible starters would be a failure but I think it would be. 1
BuffAlone Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:07 PM, John from Riverside said: I personally dont think we need to get to 2 for this to be a success One of these top 4 qbs are gonna fall.......not everyone is gonna take a qb With every pick the cost becomes a little less Expand I hear that. BUT, do you want #4? Or do you want your guy? Huge difference
MAJBobby Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:10 PM, BillsEnthusiast said: Can't officially call it a failure until we see these guys pan out, but yeah the Process will lose some credibility if they don't snag one. Expand No you really can. Because this process was put in place last Draft. So if this draft doesnt come away with one of the top QBs this specific Plan to get one FAILED. And seat starts to get hot 1 1
Dr. Who Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:10 PM, MAJBobby said: And with every Pick Risk that you are getting shut out more and morr Expand If we can get to 2, we should do it. I'm not yet convinced the Giants are stuck at 2. Further, if they aren't taking a qb themselves, I cannot really fathom a choice that would justify rejecting what they are likely to get back for the pick.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 Isn't this the guy who just Thursday was saying that the Bills aren't even targeting #2 as a landing spot? Sounds like back tracking to me.
MAJBobby Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 (edited) On 4/23/2018 at 10:13 PM, BuffaloMatt said: Two words. Aaron Maybin.....nuf said. Expand Really so Maybin was the end result of a Two Year plan? To finally address the QB position? and if not i have NO IDEA what you are trying yo say. So guess “nuf said” isnt accurate Edited April 23, 2018 by MAJBobby
The_Dude Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 Just land one of the big 3. Land one of the big 3...
BuffaloMatt Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 On 4/23/2018 at 10:15 PM, MAJBobby said: Really so Maybin was the end result of a Two Year plan? To finally address the QB position? and if not i have NO IDEA what you are trying yo say. So guess “nuf said” isnt accurate Expand NO. You know it all. I'm sorry I veiled my point. Let me make it clear. These picks are nothing but educated guesses. Some pan out some don't. BUT you have already deemed this draft a failure if this or that doesn't happen. 1
Recommended Posts