Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Homey D. Clown said:

 

Hopefully we pick at 12 and 22.  I'd like to see him stand tall in the face of all the media hype and fan screaming for a move up.  useless to move up when you have picks in the first round, and holes everywhere on your roster.

And no hole greater than QB. It's that simple. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Wrong switch! :angry:

 

 

Blowing it!  Good thing for Twitter, fans have been letting them hear it...

 

Was enjoying Murph / Tasker. 

 

 

And we're back!

Posted

On the bright side, it beats listening to those stupid Progressive Insurance ads every 2 minutes! WGR -- a subsidiary of Progressive Insurance??

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Watched on TV instead of radio. 

 

Said there was no trade blueprint in place with the Giants for 2. 

 

Everything else is typical pre draft PR. Still very interesting though. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, LittleSammy said:

On the bright side, it beats listening to those stupid Progressive Insurance ads every 2 minutes! WGR -- a subsidiary of Progressive Insurance??

 

Right on cue. It's Jamie from Progressive. :sick:

Posted
Just now, Homey D. Clown said:

 

And no prospect past the top 2 worth the jump, it's as simple as that.

You are clairvoyant then ? We know the Bills need a QB. How do you know which QBs will pan out and which won't? Shouldn't you be on an NFL FO staff ? Make a career out of picking lottery numbers etc. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Homey D. Clown said:

 

And no prospect past the top 2 worth the jump, it's as simple as that.

Except its not... 

 

You'll have to excuse the clown speaking in absolutes about something he has no inside knowledge on nor is he a professional scout. 

I'm all for hearing your opinion, but discussing it that way just makes said opinion go right out the window...

Posted

Sounds like they'll be fine with any of the top 4, or maybe even top 6.

 

Like they subscribe to the idea that all these guys have the ability to succeed and you just need to create a good environment for them.

 

They have a process in place for that.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, LeGOATski said:

Sounds like they'll be fine with any of the top 4, or maybe even top 6.

 

Like they subscribe to the idea that all these guys have the ability to succeed and you just need to create a good environment for them.

 

They have a process in place for that.

It's entirely possible they have the QBs rated very similarly outside of one , perhaps two players. There doesn't seem to be a consensus by the pundits either, so this seems reasonable. There's no Luck/ Newton in this draft. 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

Sounds like they'll be fine with any of the top 4, or maybe even top 6.

 

Like they subscribe to the idea that all these guys have the ability to succeed and you just need to create a good environment for them.

 

They have a process in place for that.

Saying you are adapatable to the strengths and weakness of whichever qb you end up with does not necessarily imply they don't have a strong preference for 1 or 2.

Edited by Dr. Who
Posted

Enjoyed hearing him talk about their mock process and how he doesn't make any of picks for the Bills or the other teams but instead makes everyone defend their selection. I suspect their mocks closely mirror the mocks in all the other war rooms around the league. 

 

I'm also convinced that Beane is totally unaffected by media and fan desires. I get the impression he's going to trust his board, too. So, if the right deal for moving up doesn't materialize, I think he's content with letting the draft come to him. And while I hope he can move up and get a QB he likes, I'm confident he's going to find good players, regardless. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Dr. Who said:

Saying you are adapatable to the strenghs and weakness of whichever qb you end up with does not necessarily imply they don't have a strong preference for 1 or 2.

Well, they definitely have them ranked #1-#6. But, that doesn't mean they're picky.

 

It gives off the impression that they're willing to settle.

Posted
24 minutes ago, PIZ said:

Oh no.......

 

 

 

I'm pretty sure every draft/scouting expert I have heard/read commenting on the QB class this year (that's about 10 million guys) has pointed out that each of the top QB prospects is flawed.

 

But the flaws are varied and it's a case of picking the combo of good/bad that appeals to you most, given availability when you pick.

 

 

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Right on cue. It's Jamie from Progressive. :sick:

I have sources that can confirm Jaime is Flo's love child with the "Can you hear me now" guy. And they are buying all kinds of land in south Buffalo.

Posted
1 minute ago, LeGOATski said:

Well, they definitely have them ranked #1-#6. But, that doesn't mean they're picky.

 

It gives off the impression that they're willing to settle.

If true, they won't trade up.  I hope you are incorrect in your surmise.  

Posted
5 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

It's entirely possible they have the QBs rated very similarly outside of one , perhaps two players. There doesn't seem to be a consensus by the pundits either, so this seems reasonable. There's no Luck/ Newton in this draft. 

And even if there was, we have seen some quarterbacks that didn't have the draft day appeal of those 2 actually achieve more in the league.  Russell Wilson comes to mind, among others.

 

I do agree there is definitely no consensus #1.  In fact, every expert you hear seems to have a different idea of the pecking order.

 

Some experts believe Allen will go #1.  Others believe Allen is a major work project and nowhere close to playing at the NFL level, others believe he will never be good at the NFL level.

 

Opinions are highly varied this year.

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...