BillsFan8083 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 (edited) I wasn't watching ... what did he say? Hey buffalobills fans... toss on GMFB ...I'll tell you how Buffalo can get their QB of the future. Edited April 23, 2018 by BillsFan8083
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 They said Ryan Fitzpatrick was a good QB, but he was somebody else’s backup. Tyrod Taylor was a good QB, but he was someone else’s backup. Aj McCarron is a good QB, you get the picture. They said in 2004 we waited and got the fourth QB and that obviously was a mistake. We need to get to 2 1
thurst44 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: They said Ryan Fitzpatrick was a good QB, but he was somebody else’s backup. Tyrod Taylor was a good QB, but he was someone else’s backup. Aj McCarron is a good QB, you get the picture. They said in 2004 we waited and got the fourth QB and that obviously was a mistake. We need to get to 2 In fairness, in 2004, we wouldn't have had to move up any higher than 10 to get franchise QB (and imo, that 4th out of 3 is looking likely to be drafted as early as 1st right now).
dlonce Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 Trade up to 6 then trade to 2. Give the colts both 1sts and a 2nd then give the Giants our number 1 next year. Thats what they put forward.
thurst44 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, dlonce said: Trade up to 6 then trade to 2. Give the colts both 1sts and a 2nd then give the Giants our number 1 next year. Thats what they put forward. Did they say who they thought the Bills would draft in this scenario?
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, thurst44 said: Did they say who they thought the Bills would draft in this scenario? I would imagine this is an extension of the "somehow, some way, Sam Darnold will be a Buffalo Bill" prediction.
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 2 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I would imagine this is an extension of the "somehow, some way, Sam Darnold will be a Buffalo Bill" prediction. Would love that. But can't see the Browns passing on him.
JohnBonhamRocks Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 I do think to get up to #2, then it has to be either (1) two trades made by OBD or (2) a three-team trade. Not like that's the hottest of takes.
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Captain Murica said: Speaking of GMFB Funny because it's true. Sadly.
Captain Murica Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Funny because it's true. Sadly. Yup, deep burn by that Ryan Seacrest wannabe I mean what do we expect when we trot out career back-ups as our starting QB.
Happy Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 17 minutes ago, dlonce said: Trade up to 6 then trade to 2. Give the colts both 1sts and a 2nd then give the Giants our number 1 next year. Thats what they put forward. If this is what they put forward, that show should be off the air.
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Happy Gilmore said: If this is what they put forward, that show should be off the air. Why do you say that? It seems reasonable to me for the circumstances of this draft.
Kirby Jackson Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 I like this idea less and less as the off-season has played out. I think Darnold goes 1. Go to 5 or 6 and get Rosen (he’s my guy anyways). Preserve your 2019 pick because this team isn’t going to be great. Offer the Colts 12, 53, 65 and a 2019 4th. That’s more than enough. You still get your QB, LB, WR and OL before pick 100. 1
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said: I like this idea less and less as the off-season has played out. I think Darnold goes 1. Go to 5 or 6 and get Rosen (he’s my guy anyways). Preserve your 2019 pick because this team isn’t going to be great. Offer the Colts 12, 53, 65 and a 2019 4th. That’s more than enough. You still get your QB, LB, WR and OL before pick 100. Can't see the Colts accepting for such little value. Switch out either 53 or 65 with 22 and I can see that trade happening.
thurst44 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 33 minutes ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Funny because it's true. Sadly. I'm pretty sure Brandt is actually fond of the Bills if not a fan. Ditto, Schrager, but with him, it's empathy because if memory serves, he's a lifelong Browns fan.
Elite Poster Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 59 minutes ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: They said Ryan Fitzpatrick was a good QB, but he was somebody else’s backup. Tyrod Taylor was a good QB, but he was someone else’s backup. Aj McCarron is a good QB, you get the picture. They said in 2004 we waited and got the fourth QB and that obviously was a mistake. We need to get to 2 This is a phenomenal post.
buffalostu2 Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 Metro sexual morning football is hardly the place to go for Bills or any other football info. It makes the old Mike and Mike show look hardcore.
Happy Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Why do you say that? It seems reasonable to me for the circumstances of this draft. Why give up a #1 next year? Pretty expensive, as well as a risk, given how many other positions need to be addressed. I can see fans in a chat site talking like this, but the GMFB hosts shouldn't get as caught up in the QB hype.
Lagoon Blues Posted April 23, 2018 Posted April 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said: I like this idea less and less as the off-season has played out. I think Darnold goes 1. Go to 5 or 6 and get Rosen (he’s my guy anyways). Preserve your 2019 pick because this team isn’t going to be great. Offer the Colts 12, 53, 65 and a 2019 4th. That’s more than enough. You still get your QB, LB, WR and OL before pick 100. If any way possible to preserve the 22nd and get a MLB and still get our QB that would be one hell of a job by our GM.
Recommended Posts