Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Eveyone thinks the Giants are waiting to see who will be available.   I think the trade parameters are already in place and it's the Bills who are waiting to ensure Darnold is still there at #2 before pulling the trigger on the deal.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Ittakestime said:

 

Anyone with a brain. 

Anyone with a brain would realize that QBs are a hot commodity and that there are more than 3 teams that desperately need a good one.  I wouldn’t be surprised to see the first 4 picks being QBs, 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Unless someone else trades up or the giants take a QB themselves.

 

 

......or any number of other things happen.....

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

Damn! Is today Thursday???

 

 

...then move 6-32 to Friday......with Thursday intrigue down the drain, can watch "I Love Lucy" re-runs.....................

Posted
Just now, Epstein's Mother said:

 

He's got the first 5 for 2019 too if your interested.

 

If he could use his clairvoyant vision help me find my glasses that I lost in the ocean yesterday, that would be a YUUUGE help! ?

Posted
Just now, Heitz said:

 

If he could use his clairvoyant vision help me find my glasses that I lost in the ocean yesterday, that would be a YUUUGE help! ?

 

Come now, it's pretty obvious the top five spots your glasses could be are already set.  ;)

Posted
20 minutes ago, Boca BIlls said:

How the !@#$ did I miss the draft?!?

 

Because it was at the OP's house and you weren't invited...

Posted
12 minutes ago, Heitz said:

 

If he could use his clairvoyant vision help me find my glasses that I lost in the ocean yesterday, that would be a YUUUGE help! ?

 

Yeah.  He says you should look in the ocean.

Posted

We are all picking on the OP, but he makes a good point in a way. 

 

We we have to figure that Barkley, Chubb, and Nelson are likely to go in the top 6, with probably 3 quarterbacks. Those guys are the blue chippers, then there is a pocket of players, Smith, Edmunds, Fitzpatrick, James etc who are all pretty closely graded, then all of the corners and offensive tackles. I do think we will be able to get a quarterback with a trade up in that 5-7, but if we really want to get our top guy, we probably need to jump the Jets or Broncos. I do think one of the top 4 will be there at 7. I still don't think we will wait. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Epstein's Mother said:

 

Yeah.  He says you should look in the ocean.

 

Much like his top 5 prediction ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

We are all picking on the OP, but he makes a good point in a way. 

 

We we have to figure that Barkley, Chubb, and Nelson are likely to go in the top 6, with probably 3 quarterbacks. Those guys are the blue chippers, then there is a pocket of players, Smith, Edmunds, Fitzpatrick, James etc who are all pretty closely graded, then all of the corners and offensive tackles. I do think we will be able to get a quarterback with a trade up in that 5-7, but if we really want to get our top guy, we probably need to jump the Jets or Broncos. I do think one of the top 4 will be there at 7. I still don't think we will wait. 

 

I think that a majority of the people on this board would agree with you on this.  However the OP is telling us that the first 5 are written in stone and if we can't see that we are morons.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

We are all picking on the OP, but he makes a good point in a way. 

 

We we have to figure that Barkley, Chubb, and Nelson are likely to go in the top 6, with probably 3 quarterbacks. Those guys are the blue chippers, then there is a pocket of players, Smith, Edmunds, Fitzpatrick, James etc who are all pretty closely graded, then all of the corners and offensive tackles. I do think we will be able to get a quarterback with a trade up in that 5-7, but if we really want to get our top guy, we probably need to jump the Jets or Broncos. I do think one of the top 4 will be there at 7. I still don't think we will wait. 

 

Likely.  We are picking on the OP because his thread title listed his prediction as an absolute certainty.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Ittakestime said:

 

Anyone with a brain. 

Do you think an organization with a brain would use the second pick in this draft on a RB?

Posted
1 hour ago, MJS said:

I don't think that's true at all.

Certainly possible, but I really think Rosen is tops on some draft boards. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Red King said:

 

Likely.  We are picking on the OP because his thread title listed his prediction as an absolute certainty.

 

Exactly.  This is opinion being put forth as though it were fact.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

If I was betting, this would be the top 5.

 

I do dislike opinion being presented as fact.  I try to read these with the first sentence being "In the opinion of the poster" ...........

Posted
1 minute ago, Epstein's Mother said:

 

Exactly.  This is opinion being put forth as though it were fact.

 

Just now, Dalton said:

If I was betting, this would be the top 5.

 

I do dislike opinion being presented as fact.  I try to read these with the first sentence being "In the opinion of the poster" ...........

 

It's rather obviously an opinion with 4+ days before the 1st round begins.  He'll either be right or not.  We'll soon see. 

×
×
  • Create New...