What was the worst Bills’ trade of all time?

[Ol Dirty B]

23 hours ago, Tcali said:

yeah details details;)...main thing is we made a historically horrible move getting EJ 

 

It wasn't a historically horrible move. Teams miss on 1st round QBs every year.

 

Why do you have this weird ax to grind. Move on.

[cba fan]

and it was EJ as part of the 16 46 222 package.

[BringBackOrton]

1 minute ago, cba fan said:

 

yes.

What was the name announced that the Bills had selected with pick #16 in the first round?

[Ol Dirty B]

11 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:

Actually, when we drafted EJ, the other two were still undrafted.

 

Only one player was drafted #16 overall.  Who was it?

 

 

This thread isn't about the #16 pick in that draft. It's about trades, those players were apart of that trade. Stop changing the subject to make an irrelevant point.

Edited April 24, 2018 by Ol Dirty B

[cba fan]

1 minute ago, jmc12290 said:

What was the name announced that the Bills had selected with pick #16 in the first round?

EJ as part of the 16 46 222 package.

[BringBackOrton]

1 minute ago, Ol Dirty B said:

 

This thread isn't about the #16 pick in that draft. It's about trades, those players were apart of thar trade. Stop changing the subject to make an irrelevant point.

You stop changing the subject.

1 minute ago, cba fan said:

EJ as part of the 16 46 222 package.

Okay, but EJ was taken with #16 which was a first round pick.  That's what he cost. Pick #16.

 

Glad we're on the same page.

[cba fan]

2 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:

You stop changing the subject.

Okay, but EJ was taken with #16 which was a first round pick.  That's what he cost. Pick #16.

 

Glad we're on the same page.

Yes EJ cost the 16th pick as part of the 16 46 222 package.

 

 

Edited April 24, 2018 by cba fan

[BringBackOrton]

Just now, cba fan said:

Yes EJ cost the 16th pick as part of the 16 46 222 package.

 

 

And we already agreed pick #16 is a first round pick.

 

So EJ cost a first round pick.

 

That was way harder than it needed to be.

[cba fan]

Now just to be sure we ARE on the same page.

 

In math, what is more? 3 or 1  ?

[BringBackOrton]

1 minute ago, cba fan said:

Now just to be sure we ARE on the same page.

 

In math, what is more? 3 or 1  ?

In math, 3 is greater than 1. 

 

In football, 1 good/great player is greater than 2 sucky players and 1 okay player.

[cba fan]

Just now, jmc12290 said:

In math, 3 is greater than 1. 

 

In football, 1 good/great player is greater than 2 sucky players and 1 okay player.

Tavon Austin is arguably maybe worth EJ Kiko and Gragg combined. But it is very close and very subjective.

I would rather have Kiko over overpaid low production Tavon Austin.

[BringBackOrton]

Just now, cba fan said:

Tavon Austin is arguably maybe worth EJ Kiko and Gragg combined. But it is very close and very subjective.

All 4 aren't good enough to be worth debating.

[Jauronimo]

8 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:

You stop changing the subject.

Okay, but EJ was taken with #16 which was a first round pick.  That's what he cost. Pick #16.

 

Glad we're on the same page.

Why are you two dangerous perverts still arguing about the 4 picks wasted on EJ when you got the 7 first round picks used on Watkins staring you square in the balls?!?!?!?!

[cba fan]

Just now, jmc12290 said:

All 4 aren't good enough to be worth debating.

You are correct. I drew this out way too far but it was somewhat fun.

My point is all semantics and it does bring up how fans can have different interpretations of value when a pick is traded for multiple picks and how to evaluate that value.

 

Cheers for the friendly debate.

 

 

[Buffalo86]

Trading for Mike Williams was a curious move, considering he had quit on Marrone at Syracuse.

[Dadonkadonk]

1. Trading Jason Peters - I don't care what they received. He was on his way to a HOF career.

2. Not trading down and taking Whitner

3. Almost every trade up this team has made - Watkins, Troup, Losman, Zay, TJ Graham, McCargo