Ol Dirty B Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 23 hours ago, Tcali said: yeah details details;)...main thing is we made a historically horrible move getting EJ It wasn't a historically horrible move. Teams miss on 1st round QBs every year. Why do you have this weird ax to grind. Move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 and it was EJ as part of the 16 46 222 package. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, cba fan said: yes. What was the name announced that the Bills had selected with pick #16 in the first round? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol Dirty B Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, jmc12290 said: Actually, when we drafted EJ, the other two were still undrafted. Only one player was drafted #16 overall. Who was it? This thread isn't about the #16 pick in that draft. It's about trades, those players were apart of that trade. Stop changing the subject to make an irrelevant point. Edited April 24, 2018 by Ol Dirty B 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, jmc12290 said: What was the name announced that the Bills had selected with pick #16 in the first round? EJ as part of the 16 46 222 package. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, Ol Dirty B said: This thread isn't about the #16 pick in that draft. It's about trades, those players were apart of thar trade. Stop changing the subject to make an irrelevant point. You stop changing the subject. 1 minute ago, cba fan said: EJ as part of the 16 46 222 package. Okay, but EJ was taken with #16 which was a first round pick. That's what he cost. Pick #16. Glad we're on the same page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, jmc12290 said: You stop changing the subject. Okay, but EJ was taken with #16 which was a first round pick. That's what he cost. Pick #16. Glad we're on the same page. Yes EJ cost the 16th pick as part of the 16 46 222 package. Edited April 24, 2018 by cba fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Just now, cba fan said: Yes EJ cost the 16th pick as part of the 16 46 222 package. And we already agreed pick #16 is a first round pick. So EJ cost a first round pick. That was way harder than it needed to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Now just to be sure we ARE on the same page. In math, what is more? 3 or 1 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 1 minute ago, cba fan said: Now just to be sure we ARE on the same page. In math, what is more? 3 or 1 ? In math, 3 is greater than 1. In football, 1 good/great player is greater than 2 sucky players and 1 okay player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Just now, jmc12290 said: In math, 3 is greater than 1. In football, 1 good/great player is greater than 2 sucky players and 1 okay player. Tavon Austin is arguably maybe worth EJ Kiko and Gragg combined. But it is very close and very subjective. I would rather have Kiko over overpaid low production Tavon Austin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Just now, cba fan said: Tavon Austin is arguably maybe worth EJ Kiko and Gragg combined. But it is very close and very subjective. All 4 aren't good enough to be worth debating. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 8 minutes ago, jmc12290 said: You stop changing the subject. Okay, but EJ was taken with #16 which was a first round pick. That's what he cost. Pick #16. Glad we're on the same page. Why are you two dangerous perverts still arguing about the 4 picks wasted on EJ when you got the 7 first round picks used on Watkins staring you square in the balls?!?!?!?! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Just now, jmc12290 said: All 4 aren't good enough to be worth debating. You are correct. I drew this out way too far but it was somewhat fun. My point is all semantics and it does bring up how fans can have different interpretations of value when a pick is traded for multiple picks and how to evaluate that value. Cheers for the friendly debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo86 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Trading for Mike Williams was a curious move, considering he had quit on Marrone at Syracuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dadonkadonk Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 1. Trading Jason Peters - I don't care what they received. He was on his way to a HOF career. 2. Not trading down and taking Whitner 3. Almost every trade up this team has made - Watkins, Troup, Losman, Zay, TJ Graham, McCargo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts