Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

[This is an automated response]As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 4/21/2018 at 1:11 AM, Canadian Bills Fan said:

[This is an automated response]As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you.

Expand  

 

:nana:

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Why would we be upset about this?  It would likely mean that Denver is taking a QB but the Giants are not.  As it stands right now, they're both taking one.  This trade would increase the chances of Bills getting a top 4 QB.

  On 4/21/2018 at 2:17 AM, dave mcbride said:

Seriously, not unimportant. The Giants are back down to 5 picks, and they are currently a team that needs picks.

Expand  

I'm sure they are frantic about losing their 2019 7th rounder.

 

 

Posted
  On 4/21/2018 at 12:50 PM, 4merper4mer said:

Why would we be upset about this?  It would likely mean that Denver is taking a QB but the Giants are not.  As it stands right now, they're both taking one.  This trade would increase the chances of Bills getting a top 4 QB.

I'm sure they are frantic about losing their 2019 7th rounder.

 

 

Expand  

I thought it was this year's. My bad.

×
×
  • Create New...