Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JohnC said:

Kirby, I say this with kindness: Let it go! Taylor plays for the Browns and the past is the past. 

 

 

I didn’t start the conversation. I just don’t like when people lie so i check them. If you tell me turnovers and punts are the same I will call you out. If you say that the turnover battle doesn’t matter I will say that 78% of the teams that win the turnover battle win the game. If you don’t want me to chime in, don’t lie.

1 hour ago, twoandfourteen said:

 

He's definitely not "Tannehill" or "Dalton". Those are mid-level legitimate starting QBs, Dalton more than Tannehill. They can actually "win" you a game or two with a big throw. Taylor can't, hasn't or won't.

 

All you have to do is go and look at a certain 4th & 12 play in Baltimore from last season to see the difference.  

 

 

Interesting that you bring up JP.... in his only full season as a starter, his numbers looked awfully familiar: 3051 yards, 19 TDs, 190 yds/gm... of course, there were 14 INTs, too. 

 

Taylor's been ~3000 yds/season, ~20 TDs, 201.3 yds/gm..... ~6 INTs/season.

 

Really, the only thing separating Taylor & Losman is 8 INTs, or .5 INTs/gm. 

 

Of course, Tyrod is obviously a better QB than JPL... but he's definitely closer to JP Losman than he is to Andy Dalton. 

 

(By the way, EJ averaged 197.2 yds/gm as a rookie... just saying.)

 

Which ones?

His numbers are better than Tannehill as is his record. So you are definitely wrong (again). 

Edited by Kirby Jackson
Posted
1 hour ago, twoandfourteen said:

 

He's definitely not "Tannehill" or "Dalton". Those are mid-level legitimate starting QBs, Dalton more than Tannehill. They can actually "win" you a game or two with a big throw. Taylor can't, hasn't or won't.

 

All you have to do is go and look at a certain 4th & 12 play in Baltimore from last season to see the difference.  

 

 

Interesting that you bring up JP.... in his only full season as a starter, his numbers looked awfully familiar: 3051 yards, 19 TDs, 190 yds/gm... of course, there were 14 INTs, too. 

 

Taylor's been ~3000 yds/season, ~20 TDs, 201.3 yds/gm..... ~6 INTs/season.

 

Really, the only thing separating Taylor & Losman is 8 INTs, or .5 INTs/gm. 

 

Of course, Tyrod is obviously a better QB than JPL... but he's definitely closer to JP Losman than he is to Andy Dalton. 

 

(By the way, EJ averaged 197.2 yds/gm as a rookie... just saying.)

 

Which ones?

 

He actually averaged 17 TDs (20, 17, 14 respective in that order) per season.

So you actually gave him more benefit of the doubt :)

I agree with the rest, he not Tanny or Dalton level.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

"  umm didn't he see the wide open receiver "   

 

Jp to evans was sure nice . It is a shame he didn;'t develop .  Both Jp and E.j had the skill set but were missing something .  Taylor is in my mind a great athlete playing qb.  He doesn't think like a qb.  He simply will not throw the ball unless a wide receiver is clearly open or running a deep route .  

Posted
12 hours ago, Richard Noggin said:

So...I just now watched the play in question. 

 

I question your depiction of it. Post-corner route that broke open; throw was clearly too far to the inside shoulder, although the WR definitely could have hauled it in. If Jones does make the catch, there's no way he scores, given the adjustment and full extension entailed. They had a timeout remaining, so it would have been 1st and 10 at the 2 yard line +/-, maybe 7 or 8 seconds remaining. 

I will admit to thinking the Miami game you're referencing, combined with the Seattle game, was evidence that Taylor had taken an important step forward. 

 

In hindsight, it looks more like he peaked right around then.

 

A LOT changed between the end of 2016 and the start of 2017..........total scheme change to an unfavorable timing offense........entire WR corps was turned over and replaced with much lesser talent........offensive strategy(play not to lose).

Posted
3 hours ago, twoandfourteen said:

 

You've got to be kidding me. 

 

You clearly have absolutely no concept or understanding of what "floor" and "average" mean. 

 

Taylor has played in 44 games as the starting QB of the Bills.

 

30 of them have been under 230 yards passing. In fact, over 50% of his games as a starter have been under 200 yards passing. To expect 250 ypg from the guy is pure fantasy with a heavy dollop of delusion. You're far more likely to get 180 or less. 

 

A very smart, articulate, and enlightened poster once posted a breakdown of TT's career production. You should go take a look. 

 

 

You clearly have no concept of what I meant by floor either. And since I introduced it, your attempt to define it is irrelevant. 

 

Floor to me is what you can expect from the player (Tyrod) as your qb typically. 

 

you choose to define his worst games as who he is. I chose to define his average as who he is. 

 

Tyrod is a fairly consistent game manager that is among the best 32 QBs in the NFL. He struggles as a pure pocket progression read passer, makes some occasionally incredible plays and can make most of the throws, just not with anticipation. He’s not great, no one accused him of that.  The narrative he is ‘terrible’ is garbage. He has won more games than he has lost as a starter-  Fact. And you can build a scheme and have personnel to maximize his strengths, which was done much more by Lynn than Rico. 

 

It’s irrational and I really can’t understand why a few have so much disdain for a guy who overachieved significantly. Why not just say thanks for the contribution to breaking the playoff drought whatever you want to believe that was and move on?   

 

The bills are choosing to upgrade, which everyone seem in favor of. But AJM could easily end up worse, as could every QB drafted next week...  and that is what I mean by FLOOR. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

You clearly have no concept of what I meant by floor either. And since I introduced it, your attempt to define it is irrelevant. 

 

Floor to me is what you can expect from the player (Tyrod) as your qb typically. 

 

you choose to define his worst games as who he is. I chose to define his average as who he is. 

 

Tyrod is a fairly consistent game manager that is among the best 32 QBs in the NFL. He struggles as a pure pocket progression read passer, makes some occasionally incredible plays and can make most of the throws, just not with anticipation. He’s not great, no one accused him of that.  The narrative he is ‘terrible’ is garbage. He has won more games than he has lost as a starter-  Fact. And you can build a scheme and have personnel to maximize his strengths, which was done much more by Lynn than Rico. 

 

It’s irrational and I really can’t understand why a few have so much disdain for a guy who overachieved significantly. Why not just say thanks for the contribution to breaking the playoff drought whatever you want to believe that was and move on?   

 

The bills are choosing to upgrade, which everyone seem in favor of. But AJM could easily end up worse, as could every QB drafted next week...  and that is what I mean by FLOOR. 

I am not sure if A.j can be worse. Taylor is very limited.   The team basically one without a qb.  They had a guy back there who didn't turn the ball over and made the easy throws.   oh sure he scrambled but usually after missing his window to throw the freaking ball 

Posted
4 hours ago, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

 

 

should I be offended here. some dick on a message board calling me out. you're a real kind of special, I mean short bus special.

 

have a nice day, dick

 

:lol:

You should be embarrassed for that gawd-awful take is what you should be.......you were so sold on Nate Peterman that you didn't think he might get replaced?

 

Or just that irrationally hateful of Taylor?  

 

That indicated a real lack of intelligence on your part and you should have just avoided the Taylor/Peterman subject thereafter.......like I said, even the most passionate Peterphiles/Tyrophobes weren't jumping in to shoot down the notion that Nay Pete might get a quick hook.

 

Again.......dude didn't even make it past HALFTIME of his first start.......you could not have been more wrong.   Eat it and own it and take your medicine or I will make it a point to keep reminding you.   :thumbsup:

Posted
3 hours ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

You can keep holding on to the great stats for the worst passing offense 3 years running.   

 

I’m not fooled.  

 

Don't let facts get in the way.

Posted

I’m glad we moved on, but he may be just what the Browns need.

 

I’ll be a Taylor fan wherever he goes, as long as his success doesn’t affect the Bills.  All he ever did here was work hard, and like a long line of qb’s here, was never given a great chance to succeed.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, baskingridgebillsfan said:

I am not sure if A.j can be worse. Taylor is very limited.

 

You're not sure? Heck, most Bills QBs in the past 20 years have been worse. It's quite possible. FWIW, I loved the Tyrod to Browns trade and am happy we're trying to upgrade.

Posted

I think what you saw in the end is that TT was not "scheme diverse"

 

I believe to this day that if you biult the offense around him he could help you win games.....the bills were no longer willing to do that....getting a 3rd round pick for him was awesome.

 

Josh Rosen.....scheme diverse accurate qb

 

Lamar Jackson.....while a great athlete like TT he is NOT TT.....and throws from the pocket.....but where people ARE correct is that much like TT....you need to biuld a certain offense around him if you want to get the most out of him...he is not a bad option if we strike out on Rosen.

Posted
2 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I didn’t start the conversation. I just don’t like when people lie so i check them. If you tell me turnovers and punts are the same I will call you out. If you say that the turnover battle doesn’t matter I will say that 78% of the teams that win the turnover battle win the game. If you don’t want me to chime in, don’t lie.

His numbers are better than Tannehill as is his record. So you are definitely wrong (again). 

No they are not.

Posted
Just now, PeterGriffin said:

No they are not.

It depends what you like. If passing yards is your thing then no. If you like any yards, TDs and less INTs combined with a better record than he is. Troll on though bro....

 

Also, you and I had a bet that if Tyrod Taylor made $10M this year you wouldn’t post here anymore so bye...

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 4/19/2018 at 3:42 PM, No Place To Hyde said:

Leadership. Work ethic. Being well dressed (or so they say). 

 

Literally all he brings to the table. Eventually they will actually play football. They will see he doesn't move an offense. Holds the ball too long. Plays way too conservative. And they will yell and scream to play the rookie.

 

Lol. The guy took your bills to the playoffs. Hate away. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I think what you saw in the end is that TT was not "scheme diverse"

 

The scheme of passing footballs while employed as a pro qb was too diverse.  

Posted
4 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

You clearly have no concept of what I meant by floor either. And since I introduced it, your attempt to define it is irrelevant. 

 

Floor to me is what you can expect from the player (Tyrod) as your qb typically. 

 

you choose to define his worst games as who he is. I chose to define his average as who he is. 

 

Tyrod is a fairly consistent game manager that is among the best 32 QBs in the NFL. He struggles as a pure pocket progression read passer, makes some occasionally incredible plays and can make most of the throws, just not with anticipation. He’s not great, no one accused him of that.  The narrative he is ‘terrible’ is garbage. He has won more games than he has lost as a starter-  Fact. And you can build a scheme and have personnel to maximize his strengths, which was done much more by Lynn than Rico. 

 

It’s irrational and I really can’t understand why a few have so much disdain for a guy who overachieved significantly. Why not just say thanks for the contribution to breaking the playoff drought whatever you want to believe that was and move on?   

 

The bills are choosing to upgrade, which everyone seem in favor of. But AJM could easily end up worse, as could every QB drafted next week...  and that is what I mean by FLOOR. 

 

Wrong again. You said "250 yds per game" as his floor, did you not?

 

Tyrod's "floor" (the minimum you could safely expect on any given gameday) is somewhere 160-180 yds passing, 20-15 yds rushing, and 1 TD total. Most games he'll give you better than that, sometimes he'll be worse or much worse. 

 

His "ceiling", or the absolute best you could reasonably expect from him is around 285-295 yds passing, 40-45 yds rushing, and 2-3 TDs. Not exactly earth shattering at his very best. 

 

"Average" is not the same as "floor". 

 

I agree -- his average is basically who he is. But that's not the same as his floor. 

Posted
39 minutes ago, twoandfourteen said:

 

Wrong again. You said "250 yds per game" as his floor, did you not?

 

Tyrod's "floor" (the minimum you could safely expect on any given gameday) is somewhere 160-180 yds passing, 20-15 yds rushing, and 1 TD total. Most games he'll give you better than that, sometimes he'll be worse or much worse. 

 

His "ceiling", or the absolute best you could reasonably expect from him is around 285-295 yds passing, 40-45 yds rushing, and 2-3 TDs. Not exactly earth shattering at his very best. 

 

"Average" is not the same as "floor". 

 

I agree -- his average is basically who he is. But that's not the same as his floor. 

 

I know what I said. I don’t care if you can’t figure it out.  

Posted
On 4/19/2018 at 4:41 PM, Kirby Jackson said:

No surprise, Tyrod is a good leader and a hard worker.

Dang Kirby, 40 likes on that post? I'd like but you getting greedy

×
×
  • Create New...