Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A post earlier today got me thinking about the top 3 guys from that class.  They have each had different types of successes but I think ultimately all of them would be considered successful "franchise QBs".  Here are the career stats.  Who do you think has been the better QB?

 

Eli Manning - 2 Super Bowls, 59.8% Completions, 51,686 yards, 6.99 ypa, 339 tds, 228 ints, career .527 winning %, 26 4th quarter comebacks 

 

Ben Roethlisberger - 2 Super Bowls, 64.1% completions, 51,065 yards, 7.87 ypa, 329 tds, 174 ints, .676 winning %, 29 4th quarter comebacks

 

Philip Rivers - 0 Super Bowls, 64.2% completions, 50,348 yards, 7.76 ypa, 342 tds, 166 ints, .547 winning %, 23 4th quarter comebacks

 

Numbers were a lot closer than I thought they would be even when I started this thread.  Personal opinion though is this is a 2 horse race.  Eli completing less than 7 ypa, 60% completions, and 50 more ints than the other 2 rules him out.  If he didn't have those SB wins he wouldn't be in any HOF conversations.  I can't really find a decent way to pick between Big Ben and Rivers though.  Obviously there is the team success but I think it is unfair to compare Spanos to Rooneys.  Outside of the brief Schottenheimmer years (who had his own well documented playoff struggles) Rivers hasn't had the team talent Big Ben has.  

 

Gun to my head I go Big Ben but I can't really come up with a compelling reason to disagree with someone choosing Rivers.  Who do you pick?

 

 

Posted

Ben, Eli, Rivers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Everyone else

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

losman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I'd go 

 

Eli

Ben 

Rivers 

I put Eli at the top for his two SB wins vs the evil empire. He had to lead his team on a final drive TD both times. That cements him as #1 for me. I'd say Roethlisberger is a very close second. He's had more tries vs the Pats than Eli, but I think he's failed most every time. Have to judge him vs the era's best.  Rivers a distant 3rd. 

Edited by Boatdrinks
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

You're forgetting the true gem of that class, one JP Losman.

 

10 wins, 23 losses, 59.2 career completion percentage, 6.6 YPA, 33 TDs, 34 INTs. Frickin' Hall of Fame numbers if I've ever seen any, huh? HUH?!

 

Nah, for real though, I'd say Ben, Eli and Rivers. Eli gets the edge of Rivers because of the championships. 

Posted

Ben - hands down, IMO.  Then Rivers, then Eli.

 

I had to think longer about Rivers vs. Eli than I thought I would.  I chose stats over championships.  I think Eli is a shoe-in for Canton.  Rivers ... not so sure.

Posted
17 minutes ago, section122 said:

A post earlier today got me thinking about the top 3 guys from that class.  They have each had different types of successes but I think ultimately all of them would be considered successful "franchise QBs".  Here are the career stats.  Who do you think has been the better QB?

 

Eli Manning - 2 Super Bowls, 59.8% Completions, 51,686 yards, 6.99 ypa, 339 tds, 228 ints, career .527 winning %, 26 4th quarter comebacks 

 

Ben Roethlisberger - 2 Super Bowls, 64.1% completions, 51,065 yards, 7.87 ypa, 329 tds, 174 ints, .676 winning %, 29 4th quarter comebacks

 

Philip Rivers - 0 Super Bowls, 64.2% completions, 50,348 yards, 7.76 ypa, 342 tds, 166 ints, .547 winning %, 23 4th quarter comebacks

 

Numbers were a lot closer than I thought they would be even when I started this thread.  Personal opinion though is this is a 2 horse race.  Eli completing less than 7 ypa, 60% completions, and 50 more ints than the other 2 rules him out.  If he didn't have those SB wins he wouldn't be in any HOF conversations.  I can't really find a decent way to pick between Big Ben and Rivers though.  Obviously there is the team success but I think it is unfair to compare Spanos to Rooneys.  Outside of the brief Schottenheimmer years (who had his own well documented playoff struggles) Rivers hasn't had the team talent Big Ben has.  

 

Gun to my head I go Big Ben but I can't really come up with a compelling reason to disagree with someone choosing Rivers.  Who do you pick?

 

 

 

How can you simply put aside those two super bowl wins for Eli like it’s no big deal. Everyone wins a super bowl right? He was the mvp of the most important game in the sport. Twice. No big deal. Ho hum around these parts. 

 

While Eli was winning Super Bowls and Super Bowl MVP’s, rivers was at home making babies. 

 

The gap between Eli and Rivers is substantial in my mind. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, bobobonators said:

 

How can you simply put aside those two super bowl wins for Eli like it’s no big deal. Everyone wins a super bowl right? He was the mvp of the most important game in the sport. Twice. No big deal. Ho hum around these parts. 

 

While Eli was winning Super Bowls and Super Bowl MVP’s, rivers was at home making babies. 

 

The gap between Eli and Rivers is substantial in my mind. 

 

cause the 2 SBs were total horseshit luck?

 

Posted

Giants didn’t even belong in the playoffs when they won their sb’s with eli. The qb always gets the mvp unless someone else does something miraculous 

×
×
  • Create New...