billsredneck1 Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 1 hour ago, bigK14094 said: Keeping the picks is the best idea. A 1 in 3 shot in the top 5 for a franchise qb is not the kind of odds I bet. Admittedly, a lower pick might be 1 in5, but, got to wieght having some newer rookie starters. Two or three more like Tre White works for me. some days i feel the same way. build the team and take rudolph/ faulk or white. i have plenty of confidence with a.j. one thing i am feeling pretty sure of is that if the browns don't pick darnold, no.2 is out the window. if the giants leave chubb and barkley at 4....then 4 is out the window.
Success Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 A lot of negative reaction, but as soon as the Pats pick him, there will be all kinds of panic on here... 2 1
Herb62 Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 OK the experts have spoken, which makes me think we shouldn't until round 2 take him at 22. I love this kid go watch his tape, some guy named Montana lasted until round 3 because of arm strength.
Kaenon Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 I do like Lauletta. Obviously he impressed at the senior bowl, has many good physical traits and competitiveness, but he wasn't a top recruit, and hadn't gotten a ton of buzz throughout the last couple of seasons until very late. With that being said, I like what I've watched on him after listening to a couple of his interviews. Has that fire, competitive spirit and moxy you want and carries a chip on his shoulder. I think he could see play and do well in the right fit with the right coaches and system - but getting that chance is very difficult for a mid-round prospect. I suspect he could go as high as round 2, and as low as round 5.
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 1 minute ago, Success said: A lot of negative reaction, but as soon as the Pats pick him, there will be all kinds of panic on here... The only people that might panic are the weirdos who want buffalo to draft him. They’ll say “I told you so” and claim that he’s the next Tom Brady
TPS Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, Gavin in Va Beach said: Interesting write-up on the QB from Richmond. https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/richmond’s-kyle-lauletta-has-everything-nfl-teams-should-but-don’t-look-for-in-a-qb-prospect/ar-AAw1n9y?li=BBnba9I I think the Bills have two guys in mind they will trade up for, and if they can't work it out, then they will go to their backup plan, which could be something like this. Wow! Next thing you know, Bob Lamb will post again.... Edited April 18, 2018 by TPS 1
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 I'd definitely consider him at pick 121, 166, or 187. 1
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 1 minute ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I'd definitely consider him at pick 121, 166, or 187. He could potentially beat out peterman for the 3rd qb role
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 18 minutes ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: He could potentially beat out peterman for the 3rd qb role If he’s still around late why not. Could always trade off AJM in a season or two if they nab a starter and this kid can be the long term back up. Cant be the only qb taken.
buffalostu2 Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 If you are a non believer in Lauletta review the combine throwing sessions. As far as accuracy and are strength I had him only behind Mayfield. Also he is going go day two so not a late round prospect. Do the research, he is a better prospect than Josh Allen In my perfect world we get Mayfield between picks 6 to 12 if not I would be happy with Lauletta late in the 2nd or 3rd. 1
Formerly Allan in MD Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 Someone's going to regret not taking him. He did great at the combine and looked really good in the Senior Bowl. This team has so many things to fix or improve that it would be a mistake to dump most of our top picks into into a top tier quarterback that's not a near consensus pick. And does it make sense to break the draft pick bank for a quarterback that might get "killed" because we didn't bring quality offensive linemen in? Then everyone would be yelling we should have saved our picks. Plus, even consensus guys can turn out to be a Ryan Leaf. I wouldn't be surprised if the Bills front office thinks along the same lines.
USABuffaloFan Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 1 hour ago, PIP said: I say don't draft a QB at all lets build around AJ and see what the kid can do. Still need a body though and am Ok with Lauletta
26CornerBlitz Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 1 hour ago, PIP said: I say don't draft a QB at all lets build around AJ and see what the kid can do. I'm very happy Beane isn't thinking like this.
NickelCity Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 57 minutes ago, Success said: A lot of negative reaction, but as soon as the Pats pick him, there will be all kinds of panic on here... I like Lauletta, but this is the year to chase one of the two/three blue chip prospects.
Tenhigh Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 5 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: I'm very happy Beane isn't thinking like this. Me too. But if the Bills can't find a partner to trade up for a top 4 QB (Allen, Darnold, Mayfield, and Rosen all gone by 5 and Cleveland wont' trade #4), what would you think about Jackson at 22 and Lauletta with our 2nd 2nd?
26CornerBlitz Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: Me too. But if the Bills can't find a partner to trade up for a top 4 QB (Allen, Darnold, Mayfield, and Rosen all gone by 5 and Cleveland wont' trade #4), what would you think about Jackson at 22 and Lauletta with our 2nd 2nd? Nope. Lauletta is a 4th round pick at best IMO.
HappyDays Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 I do like Lauletta, but we need to aim for better. My ideal draft would be to trade up to 6 or 7 and draft Rosen or Mayfield, whoever slides. This would cost a 2nd. Then also draft Lauletta with pick 65. If done right we would come away with 2 potential franchise QBs and still have picks 22, 53, 56, and 96 to build the team with. I doubt we will go the 2 QB route but I would personally hedge my bets.
blacklabel Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 If they can't get one of the top guys, I can surely see this kid being one of their contingency plans. From a number of scouting reports I've read, the dude is ahead of almost all the other QBs in terms of reading defenses, looking off the safety, going through progressions, etc. I have a lot of faith in the guys running the show over at OBD now so I'm on board with whoever they get. What I can't wait for is watching a good part of the fanbase have an absolute meltdown the moment the new QB (no matter where he was picked) throws a pick or has a bad game. I can see it now... let's go hypothetical, the Bills get, eh... Darnold... he plays in his first game and goes 15 of 28 for 267 yards, one TD and 2 picks and a couple of sacks. Several people will be screaming: "SEE?!?!?! I told you all! ALL OF YOU DIDN'T LISTEN TO ME!!! I am the message board genius and I KNEW this Darnold kid was a bum!!! A friggin' bum!! Pack your bags, Beane!! Fire McDermott!! 200 more years of no playoffs, I for one will not be around to watch it!!! I am DONE with this team!! AAAUHFUERHFRHUFRHRJHRFODFDFIHD!!!!!!!!!" 3
Tenhigh Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Nope. Lauletta is a 4th round pick at best IMO. Fair enough. Not bad insurance if the 1st rounder tanks though, no? That Ben Solak study really had me take another look at the kid. Kirk Cousins to LJ's Bob Griffin III. Edited April 18, 2018 by Tenhigh
Recommended Posts