HailMary Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 Not a secret to anyone but we'll need to get to 4 to 5 to get to 2. Get Elway on the phone Monday morning. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2770633-saquon-barkley-rumors-giants-view-rb-as-near-perfect-prospect-in-2018-nfl-draft?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming-national
Augie Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 Oh, so the price of the #2 pick just went up again with this declaration?
MrEpsYtown Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 But he grew up a Jets fan Great fit for them if they take him.
PastorMKC Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 The Browns have not interviewed or set up visits with either Barkley/Chubb that tells me we are going QB #1 (Darnold) and either Ward or a trade down with #4 ... The Giants can stay at 2 or trade down with Denver for #5 and still get Barkley ...
Doc Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 Forget #2. Focus on 4. Sell the Browns on the need for a franchise LT (McGlinchey) to protect their recently-drafted franchise QB.
Virgil Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 Double edged sword. We don’t want them to take a QB, but we also don’t want them to love someone so much they won’t trade back. 1
PastorMKC Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 The Browns won't address OT until the 2nd rd. or later IMO they really like Coleman at LT and Hubbard who they signed from Pittsburgh at RT ...
Da webster guy Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 I see the perfect scenario being Giants stay put and take Barkley, we trade w the Browns for that #4 spot and get our qb AND pay a lot less than getting to #2.
3rdand12 Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 Barkley is worth the early pick. Whether Browns take him at one and still get their QB or Ginats think Eli can carry them and want to win now.. He is going to make any team better immediately
NoSaint Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 The giants have to sell that they LOVE someone. And preferably someone that would be available a couple picks back. Im sure they don’t mind taking him high but calling him near perfect screams “up those offers”
Marv's Neighbor Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 IF this is true, the Giants should NEVER play poker!
JimBob2232 Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 Barkley is a perfect fit in NY...I'd honestly be surpised if the Giants trade that pick.
aristocrat Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 Good let the jets take Allen and we get Rosen at 6 or 7
Chicken Boo Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 I think we'll trade up to #4 and I expect both Rosen and Darnold to still be available. The Giants have quite a decision ahead of them. It's either Barkley or Chubb.
auburnbillsbacker Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 I believe that the giants will take a QB at 2 and Brakley will not be taken in the top 4.
dezertbill Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 this fuels the other thread about the Bills, Browns, and Giants doing a 3 way deal where Giants don’t drop past 4 so they don’t lose out on the chance to draft Barkley
NewEra Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Augie said: Oh, so the price of the #2 pick just went up again with this declaration? Fine by me. That’s means the giants won’t take a QB. If the browns take Allen it would almost assure us of landing Darnold, Mayfield or Rosen. Beane wouldn’t let that opportunity to pass him by. He could then just trade to 4-7 and get one of the best 3 QBs in the draft. Worst case scenario for the Bills would be if the Giants loved a or a couple of the QBs. The love for Saquon is nothing but good for the Bills imo. Only thing that would make it difficult is if McBeane is only interested in 2 QBs, which I hope isn’t the case. 1
billspro Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 They are crazy if they think an RB is more valuable than picks. RBs probably get injured more than any other position and have short careers.
Recommended Posts